On Wed, Mar 25, 2020, at 4:05 AM, Steven Hartland wrote:
> Just plugging the nic in isn’t always enough for it to link it needs to be
> configured. If you have it configured in the os then this won’t be a
> problem.
>
> Does that make sense?
I think you are saying that my entries in /etc/rc.conf
Just plugging the nic in isn’t always enough for it to link it needs to be
configured. If you have it configured in the os then this won’t be a
problem.
Does that make sense?
On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 at 01:10, Dan Langille wrote:
> They seem to come up on boot ok for me. This system has not been reb
They seem to come up on boot ok for me. This system has not been rebooted since
going to 10G.
Is that what you meant?
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020, at 6:48 PM, Steven Hartland wrote:
> Watch out for the fact some nics don't fully initialise until they are
> given an IP.
>
> On 24/03/2020 21:45, Dan L
Watch out for the fact some nics don't fully initialise until they are
given an IP.
On 24/03/2020 21:45, Dan Langille wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020, at 4:58 PM, Sergey Akhmatov wrote:
On 2020-03-24 11:22 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseSX )
status: ac
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020, at 4:58 PM, Sergey Akhmatov wrote:
>
> On 2020-03-24 11:22 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
> >
> > media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseSX )
> > status: active
> > supported media:
> > media autoselect
> > media 10Gbase-SR
> > nd6 options=23
> >
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020, at 5:23 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2020, at 7:24 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 22, 2020, at 7:03 PM, Gary Palmer wrote:
> > > On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 05:11:20PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Mar 22, 2020, at 4:43 PM, sth...@nethelp.no w
On Sun, Mar 22, 2020, at 7:24 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2020, at 7:03 PM, Gary Palmer wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 05:11:20PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
> > > On Sun, Mar 22, 2020, at 4:43 PM, sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
> > > > > Partial success. The card is now able to use an
10G
0x8 - advertise 10M
100M and 10M are only supported on certain adapters.
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Dan Langille
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2020 2:23 PM
To: Gary Palmer
Cc: sthaug ; Pieper, Jeffrey E ;
freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: SFP+ on PRO/10GbE
On Sun
On 2020-03-24 11:22 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseSX )
status: active
supported media:
media autoselect
media 10Gbase-SR
nd6 options=23
plugged: SFP/SFP+/SFP28 10G Base-SR (LC)
vendor:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020, at 4:24 AM, Sergey Akhmatov wrote:
>
> On 2020-03-22 8:35 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
> > Hello Jeff,
> >
> > Partial success. The card is now able to use an SFP+ optic. It warns me
> > when the optic is installed:
> >
> > Mar 22 16:49:45 r720-01 kernel: WARNING: Intel (R) Netw
On 2020-03-22 8:35 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
Hello Jeff,
Partial success. The card is now able to use an SFP+ optic. It warns me
when the optic is installed:
Mar 22 16:49:45 r720-01 kernel: WARNING: Intel (R) Network Connections are
quality tested using Intel (R) Ethernet Optics. Using untes
On Sun, 22 Mar 2020 17:11:20 -0400
"Dan Langille" wrote:
> > > I cannot use an SFP+ optic at the switch. The connection just
> > > does not happen.
> I just tried the other switch (US-48) which had one SFP+ port free.
> Same issues there.
Does the switch allow to select the link capacity man
On Sun, Mar 22, 2020, at 7:03 PM, Gary Palmer wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 05:11:20PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 22, 2020, at 4:43 PM, sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
> > > > Partial success. The card is now able to use an SFP+ optic. It warns
> > > > me
> > > > when the optic is in
On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 05:11:20PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2020, at 4:43 PM, sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
> > > Partial success. The card is now able to use an SFP+ optic. It warns me
> > > when the optic is installed:
> > >
> > > Mar 22 16:49:45 r720-01 kernel: WARNING: Intel (
On Sun, Mar 22, 2020, at 4:43 PM, sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
> > Partial success. The card is now able to use an SFP+ optic. It warns me
> > when the optic is installed:
> >
> > Mar 22 16:49:45 r720-01 kernel: WARNING: Intel (R) Network Connections are
> > quality tested using Intel (R) Ethernet
> Partial success. The card is now able to use an SFP+ optic. It warns me
> when the optic is installed:
>
> Mar 22 16:49:45 r720-01 kernel: WARNING: Intel (R) Network Connections are
> quality tested using Intel (R) Ethernet Optics. Using untested modules is not
> supported and may cause unst
iginal Message-
> From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org On
> Behalf Of Dan Langille
> Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2020 3:25 PM
> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> Subject: SFP+ on PRO/10GbE
>
> Hello,
>
> I have an PRO/10GbE in a Dell R720, running FreeBSD 12.1, connected to
Behalf
Of Dan Langille
Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2020 3:25 PM
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: SFP+ on PRO/10GbE
Hello,
I have an PRO/10GbE in a Dell R720, running FreeBSD 12.1, connected to a Unifi
US-16-X switch. At present it is using an SFP transceiver. I wanted to move to
SFP+.
I am
Hello,
I have an PRO/10GbE in a Dell R720, running FreeBSD 12.1, connected to a Unifi
US-16-X switch. At present it is using an SFP transceiver. I wanted to move to
SFP+.
I am not sure which card this is. The iDRAC tells me:
* Integrated NIC 1 - Intel(R) 2P X520/2P I350 rNDC
* the service tag
19 matches
Mail list logo
