On Sun, Mar 22, 2020, at 7:03 PM, Gary Palmer wrote: > On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 05:11:20PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 22, 2020, at 4:43 PM, sth...@nethelp.no wrote: > > > > Partial success. The card is now able to use an SFP+ optic. It warns > > > > me > > > > when the optic is installed: > > > > > > > > Mar 22 16:49:45 r720-01 kernel: WARNING: Intel (R) Network Connections > > > > are quality tested using Intel (R) Ethernet Optics. Using untested > > > > modules is not supported and may cause unstable operation or damage to > > > > the module or the adapter. Intel Corporation is not responsible for any > > > > harm caused by using untested modules. > > > > > > > > I cannot use an SFP+ optic at the switch. The connection just does not > > > > happen. > > > > > > > > If I go back to the original SFP optic, the connection occurs, as > > > > expected at 1G. > > > > > > > > On the switch side, I've tried a known good optic from an existing > > > > connection. > > > > > > > > I could install an PRO/10GbE instead, that has a built-in transceiver. > > > > I have > > > > two of those in use now, both working on 10G. > > > > > > Have you tried connected it to something other than the Unifi switch? > > > > The only SFP+ capable switches I have are Unifi. > > > > I just tried the other switch (US-48) which had one SFP+ port free. Same > > issues there. > > Did the Unifi switch see the SFP+ optics on the switch end?
That port never lit up on the switch. I didn't check anything else, switch-related. > What happens if you take the SFP+ module from the server and put it in the > other Unifi switch and try establishing a link between the two switches? The two switches are already joined via SFP+ so I bet that would shut down the port in question. -- Dan Langille d...@langille.org _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
