Phil Regnauld wrote:
>Michal Vanco (vanco) writes:
>
>
>>On Sunday 19 June 2005 21:54, Sten Daniel Sørsdal wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
>>>
>>>
My vote is that we should implement this functionality and make it
switchable via sysctl. I'd leave the default as is.
>>
Michal Vanco (vanco) writes:
> On Sunday 19 June 2005 21:54, Sten Daniel Sørsdal wrote:
> > Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> > > My vote is that we should implement this functionality and make it
> > > switchable via sysctl. I'd leave the default as is.
> > >
> > > What is opinion of other networkers?
> >
>
On Sunday 19 June 2005 21:54, Sten Daniel Sørsdal wrote:
> Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> > My vote is that we should implement this functionality and make it
> > switchable via sysctl. I'd leave the default as is.
> >
> > What is opinion of other networkers?
>
> How about also adding a sysctl for setting
Mike Tancsa wrote:
I like this idea as well, but you need to control how the routes would
come back after the interface comes back up ? This seems more of the
province of a routing daemon like quagga as opposed to a kernel
feature no ?
The connected interface should try to transmit packet
At 04:29 AM 19/06/2005, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 10:14:32PM +0200, Jose M Rodriguez wrote:
J> Second, you may need a route daemon for this. ospf is a well known
J> canditate where convergence in case of lost link is a must.
I've checked that Cisco routers remove route from F
Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
>
> My vote is that we should implement this functionality and make it
> switchable via sysctl. I'd leave the default as is.
>
> What is opinion of other networkers?
>
How about also adding a sysctl for setting a delay time between event
and disabling of the route? Then eve
El Domingo, 19 de Junio de 2005 10:48, Michal Vanco escribió:
> On Sunday 19 June 2005 10:29, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 10:14:32PM +0200, Jose M Rodriguez wrote:
> > J> Second, you may need a route daemon for this. ospf is a well
> > known J> canditate where convergence in c
On Sunday 19 June 2005 10:29, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 10:14:32PM +0200, Jose M Rodriguez wrote:
> J> Second, you may need a route daemon for this. ospf is a well known
> J> canditate where convergence in case of lost link is a must.
>
> While an OSPF daemon may stop advertis
On Sat, Jun 18, 2005 at 10:14:32PM +0200, Jose M Rodriguez wrote:
J> Second, you may need a route daemon for this. ospf is a well known
J> canditate where convergence in case of lost link is a must.
While an OSPF daemon may stop advertising the affected route to its
neighbors, the kernel will st
