On Sunday 19 June 2005 21:54, Sten Daniel Sørsdal wrote: > Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > > My vote is that we should implement this functionality and make it > > switchable via sysctl. I'd leave the default as is. > > > > What is opinion of other networkers? > > How about also adding a sysctl for setting a delay time between event > and disabling of the route? Then even people with roaming wlan cards can > benefit. > Also it is in my opinion that the route be disabled (moved to a passive > route table maybe?) and not deleted.
This is what I meant initially. Marking route passive is better than just deleting it and it'll be also faster to recall the route back in case of link up.
pgpnkVJdIM0W1.pgp
Description: PGP signature