On 1 Oct 2009, at 12:24, pluknet wrote:
If you run into this again, let me know. Also, are you using
accept filters
on the box?
Got it again (this time on 6.4-p5).
P.S.
It's funny to say: I got it on two boxes nearly simultaneously.
Both from proftpd. See also my first mail (the same).
2009/10/1 pluknet :
> 2009/4/25 Robert Watson :
>>
>> On Fri, 24 Apr 2009, pluknet wrote:
>>
>>> 2009/4/23 Robert Watson :
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, pluknet wrote:
> Please, give me comment on this. The panic is on 6.2-REL. Is it known to
> be fixed in the latter releases?
>>
2009/4/25 Robert Watson :
>
> On Fri, 24 Apr 2009, pluknet wrote:
>
>> 2009/4/23 Robert Watson :
>>>
>>> On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, pluknet wrote:
>>>
Please, give me comment on this. The panic is on 6.2-REL. Is it known to
be fixed in the latter releases?
>>>
>>> It may well be -- there have b
2009/4/25 Robert Watson :
>
> On Fri, 24 Apr 2009, pluknet wrote:
>
>> 2009/4/23 Robert Watson :
>>>
>>> On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, pluknet wrote:
>>>
Please, give me comment on this. The panic is on 6.2-REL. Is it known to
be fixed in the latter releases?
>>>
>>> It may well be -- there have b
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009, pluknet wrote:
2009/4/23 Robert Watson :
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, pluknet wrote:
Please, give me comment on this. The panic is on 6.2-REL. Is it known to
be fixed in the latter releases?
It may well be -- there have been quite significant architectural
improvements to soc
2009/4/23 Robert Watson :
> On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, pluknet wrote:
>
>> Please, give me comment on this. The panic is on 6.2-REL. Is it known to
>> be fixed in the latter releases?
>
> It may well be -- there have been quite significant architectural
> improvements to socket life cycle (etc) between 6
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, pluknet wrote:
Please, give me comment on this. The panic is on 6.2-REL. Is it known to be
fixed in the latter releases?
It may well be -- there have been quite significant architectural improvements
to socket life cycle (etc) between 6.2 and 7.x releases, which may well
