On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Eduardo Meyer
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Eduardo Meyer
>>> wrote:
>>>
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Pavel Od
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Eduardo Meyer wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Eduardo Meyer
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Pavel Odintsov <
>>> pavel.odint...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hello!
>>>
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Eduardo Meyer
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Pavel Odintsov > >
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hello!
>> >
>> > You could enable multiple queues for each NIC and run single instance of
>> > kipfw on eac
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Eduardo Meyer wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Pavel Odintsov
> wrote:
>
> > Hello!
> >
> > You could enable multiple queues for each NIC and run single instance of
> > kipfw on each pair:
> > kipfw netmap:ix0-0 netmap:ix1-0
> > kipfw netmap:ix0-1 netmap
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Pavel Odintsov
wrote:
> Hello!
>
> You could enable multiple queues for each NIC and run single instance of
> kipfw on each pair:
> kipfw netmap:ix0-0 netmap:ix1-0
> kipfw netmap:ix0-1 netmap:ix1-1
>
> And so on ;) i have about 12 mpps with this configuration (on
You should run netmap-ipfw with this command (it will run 8 copies of
kipfw):
for i in `seq 0 7`; do IPFW_PORT="555$i" taskset -c $i kipfw
netmap:eth0-$i netmap:eth1-$i & done
When you need add or remove rule you should do it for all 8 copies of kipfw:
for i in `seq 0 7`;do IPFW_PORT="555$i" ipfw/
Hello!
You could enable multiple queues for each NIC and run single instance of
kipfw on each pair:
kipfw netmap:ix0-0 netmap:ix1-0
kipfw netmap:ix0-1 netmap:ix1-1
And so on ;) i have about 12 mpps with this configuration (on Linux netmap).
On Friday, July 10, 2015, Eduardo Meyer wrote:
> Hell
