> On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Michael C . Wu wrote:
>
> > I can confirm the following:
> > A) You are a troll.
> > B) The above "confirmation" states nothing. You fail
> >to state the conditions of the test. You do not qualify
> >your statements with facts.
>
> Neither do you. Does that make you
On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Michael C . Wu wrote:
> I can confirm the following:
> A) You are a troll.
> B) The above "confirmation" states nothing. You fail
>to state the conditions of the test. You do not qualify
>your statements with facts.
Neither do you. Does that make you a troll too?
On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 08:55:41AM +0800, David Xu scribbled:
| Friday, March 23, 2001, 3:12:19 AM, you wrote:
| JG> Interesting topic in the linux kernel mailing list (Linux is "a lot" faster than
| JG> FreeBSD):
| JG> http://kt.zork.net/kernel-traffic/latest.html#2
|
| JG> I came to use FreeBSD
great goobers of gahness. it's like comparing windows to any other
operating system.
I have never understood running Linux as a server based platform when
FreeBSD and OpenBSD do it so much better. I'm pretty sure the only reason
people even bothered with Linux to begin with was because it was
Jonathan Graehl wrote:
>
> What would it take to get Linus to give the nod to an implementation conforming
> to the kqueue API? I remember him saying that he only wanted it to work for
> file descriptors, and to only allow one kqueue per process - neither of which I
> agree with. The abstractio
> Yes, we do. In fact, the difference between FreeBSD and Linux is
> greater
> than 2x. On equivalent processors, we demonstrated 1900 polygraph
> req/sec
> on FreeBSD 4.2 and 720 polygraph req/sec on a 2.2.14 Linux kernel. It's
> also worth mentioning that the response time for FreeBSD at 1900
On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 02:21:24PM +0530, Ashutosh S. Rajekar wrote:
> [FreeBSD TCP/IP is faster than Linux TCP/IP in Benchmark X]
> > [Linux TCP/IP is faster than FreeBSD TCP/IP in Benchmark Y]
There are lies, statistics, and benchmarks. And then there are the
conclusions based on them. The con
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
>I can confirm Linux 2.4 TCP/IP is faster than FreeBSD, they have
>dynamic tuned TCP window, unlike we have a fixed max TCP window
>set in SYSCTL. they have SACK and FACK, it is better in high speed line
>than FreeBSD, it is also multi-threaded, better on
Hi,
Recently there was a culomn in byte.com by Moshe Bar, and his tests seemed
to show that FreeBSD-4.1.1 could still beat the Linux 2.4.0 kernel. The
test machine was a 2-way SMP machine, running the a giant locked
FreeBSD-4.1.1 kernel and also a fine-locked 2.4.0 Linux kernel. Here's the
link:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 03:03:28PM +0800, David Xu wrote:
> Linux 2.2 is known slow at TCP/IP throughput,
> but did you test Linux 2.4? it is very different.
> while Linux and FreeBSD are being improved, some guys here
> are still comparing FreeBSD with Linux 2.2, it's unfair, useless
> and wast
David Xu wrote:
>
> Linux 2.2 is known slow at TCP/IP throughput,
> but did you test Linux 2.4? it is very different.
> while Linux and FreeBSD are being improved, some guys here
> are still comparing FreeBSD with Linux 2.2, it's unfair, useless
> and waste time. please stop doing such a stupid
> Note that iMimic claims to run on a standard FreeBSD platform, which
> would also imply they use kqueue; this alone can probably provide the
> 2x performance boost you see on polygraph.
Yes, we do. In fact, the difference between FreeBSD and Linux is
greater
than 2x. On equivalent processors,
Jonathan Graehl wrote:
>
> Interesting topic in the linux kernel mailing list (Linux is "a lot" faster than
> FreeBSD):
> http://kt.zork.net/kernel-traffic/latest.html#2
>
> I came to use FreeBSD from Linux for servers because of kqueue. I stayed
> because I liked the entire system. I'm sure t
On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, Jonathan Lemon wrote:
> Yeah, I read this; it basically ended with the author of the GigE card
> making unsubstantiated claims that Linux is "much" faster than FreeBSD.
>
> Without more solid information, this is basically FUD. I'm sure that
> by picking the appropriate ben
Hello Jonathan,
Friday, March 23, 2001, 3:12:19 AM, you wrote:
JG> Interesting topic in the linux kernel mailing list (Linux is "a lot" faster than
JG> FreeBSD):
JG> http://kt.zork.net/kernel-traffic/latest.html#2
JG> I came to use FreeBSD from Linux for servers because of kqueue. I stayed
JG>
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
>Interesting topic in the linux kernel mailing list (Linux is "a lot"
>faster than
>FreeBSD):
>http://kt.zork.net/kernel-traffic/latest.html#2
Yeah, I read this; it basically ended with the author of the GigE card
making unsubstantiated claims that Linux
* Jonathan Graehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010322 11:13] wrote:
> Interesting topic in the linux kernel mailing list (Linux is "a lot" faster than
> FreeBSD):
> http://kt.zork.net/kernel-traffic/latest.html#2
>
> I came to use FreeBSD from Linux for servers because of kqueue. I stayed
> because I li
17 matches
Mail list logo
