David Xu wrote: > > Linux 2.2 is known slow at TCP/IP throughput, > but did you test Linux 2.4? it is very different. > while Linux and FreeBSD are being improved, some guys here > are still comparing FreeBSD with Linux 2.2, it's unfair, useless > and waste time. please stop doing such a stupid thing! > You should look into the tests at www.measurement-factory.com that Jonathon refers to before calling them "stupid." At the time of these tests, Linux 2.4 was not released. Alan To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
- Linux Vs. FreeBSD Networking Performance Jonathan Graehl
- Re: Linux Vs. FreeBSD Networking Performance Alfred Perlstein
- Re: Linux Vs. FreeBSD Networking Performance Julian Elischer
- Re: Linux Vs. FreeBSD Networking Performance Jonathan Lemon
- Re: Linux Vs. FreeBSD Networking Performance Rik van Riel
- Re: Linux Vs. FreeBSD Networking Performance David Xu
- Re: Linux Vs. FreeBSD Networking Performance Jonathan Lemon
- Re: Linux Vs. FreeBSD Networking Performance Alan L. Cox
- Re[2]: Linux Vs. FreeBSD Networking Performance David Xu
- Re: Linux Vs. FreeBSD Networking Performance Alan L. Cox
- Re: Linux Vs. FreeBSD Networking Performance Bill Fumerola
- Re: Linux Vs. FreeBSD Networking Performance Ashutosh S. Rajekar
- Re: Linux Vs. FreeBSD Networking Performance Steve Shah
- RE: Linux Vs. FreeBSD Networking Performance Jonathan Graehl
- Re: Linux Vs. FreeBSD Networking Performance Alan L. Cox
- Re: Linux Vs. FreeBSD Networking Performance Michael C . Wu
- Re: Linux Vs. FreeBSD Networking Performance Rik van Riel
- Re: Linux Vs. FreeBSD Networking Performance Jeremiah Gowdy