Ian FREISLICH wrote:
>
> Julian Elischer wrote:
> > On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
> > > Andre Oppermann wrote:
> > > > Here is the next preview patch for the ipfw to pfil_hooks conversion:
> > > >
> > > > http://www.nrg4u.com/freebsd/ipfw-pfilhooks-and-more-20040621.diff
> > > >
> >
Julian Elischer wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
> > Andre Oppermann wrote:
> > > Here is the next preview patch for the ipfw to pfil_hooks conversion:
> > >
> > > http://www.nrg4u.com/freebsd/ipfw-pfilhooks-and-more-20040621.diff
> > >
> > > This patch significantly cleans up
Just to note that I've posted you feedback on this patch off-list.
Regards,
BMS
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
> Andre Oppermann wrote:
> > Here is the next preview patch for the ipfw to pfil_hooks conversion:
> >
> > http://www.nrg4u.com/freebsd/ipfw-pfilhooks-and-more-20040621.diff
> >
> > This patch significantly cleans up ip_input.c and ip_output.c.
>
>
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, 13:38+0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> Maxim Konovalov wrote:
> >
> > Hi Andre,
> >
> > On Mon, 21 Jun 2004, 23:36+0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> >
> > > Here is the next preview patch for the ipfw to pfil_hooks conversion:
> > >
> > > http://www.nrg4u.com/freebsd/ipfw-pfilhook
Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 11:36:21PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> > Here is the next preview patch for the ipfw to pfil_hooks conversion:
> >
> > http://www.nrg4u.com/freebsd/ipfw-pfilhooks-and-more-20040621.diff
> >
> > This patch significantly cleans up ip_input.c and i
Andre Oppermann wrote:
> > There have been about 5 PRs (most with patches) in the past years
> > which all claim to fix this problem indicating that here is a need
> > for a fix. We rely on the fix in kern/64240 to collect traffic
> > accounting information for billing and statistical purposes. T
Angelo Turetta wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Andre Oppermann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, June 21, 2004 11:36 PM
>
> > This patch significantly cleans up ip_input.c and ip_output.c.
> >
> > The following is included in this patch:
> >
> > o Remove all ipfw related cru
Maxim Konovalov wrote:
>
> On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, 02:06-0700, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 12:15:21PM +0400, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
> > ...
> > > > Consider this a FYI. It is very much a WIP at the moment. I want
> > > > to get this into the tree in before 5.3 code freeze.
> >
Ian FREISLICH wrote:
>
> Andre Oppermann wrote:
> > Here is the next preview patch for the ipfw to pfil_hooks conversion:
> >
> > http://www.nrg4u.com/freebsd/ipfw-pfilhooks-and-more-20040621.diff
> >
> > This patch significantly cleans up ip_input.c and ip_output.c.
>
> That would be a very a
Maxim Konovalov wrote:
>
> Hi Andre,
>
> On Mon, 21 Jun 2004, 23:36+0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
>
> > Here is the next preview patch for the ipfw to pfil_hooks conversion:
> >
> > http://www.nrg4u.com/freebsd/ipfw-pfilhooks-and-more-20040621.diff
> >
> > This patch significantly cleans up ip_i
Maxim Konovalov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> $ ident /usr/src-5-current/sys/kern/uipc_syscalls.c
Wrong file - but this is pointless, anyway. You are generalizing from
a single data point. I can show you a room full of servers that can't
run 5.2.1 due to bugs in the ACPI support code and in two
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, 11:49+0200, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
> Maxim Konovalov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Yesterday -CURRENT leaks kernel memory very quickly and panics after
> > 10 - 15 mins up.
>
> Nope. That bug was introduced on June 9th, almost two weeks ago, and
Nope :-)
$ ident /usr/
- Original Message -
From: "Andre Oppermann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 21, 2004 11:36 PM
> This patch significantly cleans up ip_input.c and ip_output.c.
>
> The following is included in this patch:
>
> o Remove all ipfw related cruft from ip_input() and ip_output()
> o
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 11:36:21PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> Here is the next preview patch for the ipfw to pfil_hooks conversion:
>
> http://www.nrg4u.com/freebsd/ipfw-pfilhooks-and-more-20040621.diff
>
> This patch significantly cleans up ip_input.c and ip_output.c.
>
assorted comment
Maxim Konovalov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yesterday -CURRENT leaks kernel memory very quickly and panics after
> 10 - 15 mins up.
Nope. That bug was introduced on June 9th, almost two weeks ago, and
it was fixed less than twelve hours later. I have several machines
already running yesterday'
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, 02:06-0700, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 12:15:21PM +0400, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
> ...
> > > Consider this a FYI. It is very much a WIP at the moment. I want
> > > to get this into the tree in before 5.3 code freeze.
> >
> > In fact, our real world tests sho
On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, 11:23+0200, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
> Maxim Konovalov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > In fact, our real world tests shown the current -CURRENT comparing to
> > RELENG_5_2 is in a very bad shape.
>
> You'll have to substantiate that. All *my* real world tests show that
> -C
Maxim Konovalov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In fact, our real world tests shown the current -CURRENT comparing to
> RELENG_5_2 is in a very bad shape.
You'll have to substantiate that. All *my* real world tests show that
-CURRENT is a lot more stable and functional than RELENG_5_2.
>
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 12:15:21PM +0400, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
...
> > Consider this a FYI. It is very much a WIP at the moment. I want
> > to get this into the tree in before 5.3 code freeze.
>
> In fact, our real world tests shown the current -CURRENT comparing to
> RELENG_5_2 is in a very b
Andre Oppermann wrote:
> Here is the next preview patch for the ipfw to pfil_hooks conversion:
>
> http://www.nrg4u.com/freebsd/ipfw-pfilhooks-and-more-20040621.diff
>
> This patch significantly cleans up ip_input.c and ip_output.c.
That would be a very a nice thing, but it looks like this bre
Hi Andre,
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004, 23:36+0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> Here is the next preview patch for the ipfw to pfil_hooks conversion:
>
> http://www.nrg4u.com/freebsd/ipfw-pfilhooks-and-more-20040621.diff
>
> This patch significantly cleans up ip_input.c and ip_output.c.
>
> The following is
Here is the next preview patch for the ipfw to pfil_hooks conversion:
http://www.nrg4u.com/freebsd/ipfw-pfilhooks-and-more-20040621.diff
This patch significantly cleans up ip_input.c and ip_output.c.
The following is included in this patch:
o Remove all ipfw related cruft from ip_input() and ip_o
23 matches
Mail list logo
