On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, 11:23+0200, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > Maxim Konovalov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > In fact, our real world tests shown the current -CURRENT comparing to > > RELENG_5_2 is in a very bad shape. > > You'll have to substantiate that. All *my* real world tests show that > -CURRENT is a lot more stable and functional than RELENG_5_2.
Yesterday -CURRENT leaks kernel memory very quickly and panics after 10 - 15 mins up. Machine is 2x3GHz Xeon, 4GB RAM, ~5000 httpd/ftpd tcp sessions, 300-400Mbps output, ~50TB output in a day. The same config (kernel, sysctl's, loader tunables, hardware) works well with RELENG_5_2. -- Maxim Konovalov _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
