Maxim Konovalov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In fact, our real world tests shown the current -CURRENT comparing to > RELENG_5_2 is in a very bad shape.
You'll have to substantiate that. All *my* real world tests show that -CURRENT is a lot more stable and functional than RELENG_5_2. > Is it really worth to commit that > mostly cleanup code before say 6-CURRENT with a chance to > destabilizate -CURRENT a bit more? It is not simply cleanup, it is very important and long-expected cleanup. Delaying it until after the branch will only make matters worse, by accelerating code drift between HEAD and 5-STABLE. DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
