On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 05:09:14AM -0200, Fernando Gont wrote:
> At 03:23 a.m. 04/03/2008, Mike Silbersack wrote:
>
>> Too optimistic:
>>
>> ! #define IPPORT_EPHEMERALLAST 655535
>>
>> Otherwise the patch looks good to me. It looked a bit strange in unified
>> diff format, I needed to look at
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 11:23:16PM -0600, Mike Silbersack wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 3 Mar 2008, Fernando Gont wrote:
>
>> At 04:11 a.m. 03/03/2008, Mike Silbersack wrote:
>>
Here's the same patch, but with the first ephemeral port changed from
1024 to 1.
>>>
>>> Now that I've actuall
At 03:23 a.m. 04/03/2008, Mike Silbersack wrote:
Too optimistic:
! #define IPPORT_EPHEMERALLAST 655535
Otherwise the patch looks good to me. It looked a bit strange in
unified diff format, I needed to look at it in context
format. (Strange, since I usually prefer unified.)
Doh! I had fi
On Mon, 3 Mar 2008, Fernando Gont wrote:
At 04:11 a.m. 03/03/2008, Mike Silbersack wrote:
Here's the same patch, but with the first ephemeral port changed from 1024
to 1.
Now that I've actually gone to try to apply the patch (so I can view the
two codepaths side by side, rather than i
At 04:11 a.m. 03/03/2008, Mike Silbersack wrote:
Here's the same patch, but with the first ephemeral port changed
from 1024 to 1.
Now that I've actually gone to try to apply the patch (so I can view
the two codepaths side by side, rather than in diff form), I'm
finding that I can't apply
On Mon, 3 Mar 2008, Fernando Gont wrote:
Folks,
Here's the same patch, but with the first ephemeral port changed from 1024 to
1.
Now that I've actually gone to try to apply the patch (so I can view the
two codepaths side by side, rather than in diff form), I'm finding that I
can't app
Folks,
Here's the same patch, but with the first ephemeral port changed from
1024 to 1.
Index: in.h
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/netinet/in.h,v
retrieving revision 1.100
diff -u -r1.100 in.h
--- in.h12 Jun 2007 16:
