On Mon, 3 Mar 2008, Fernando Gont wrote:
At 04:11 a.m. 03/03/2008, Mike Silbersack wrote:
Here's the same patch, but with the first ephemeral port changed from 1024
to 10000.
Now that I've actually gone to try to apply the patch (so I can view the
two codepaths side by side, rather than in diff form), I'm finding that I
can't apply it. I think all the whitespace got stomped, either by your
mail program or my mail program. Can you please resent this as an
attachment?
Sure. Please let me know if this one is okay.
Kind regards,
--
Fernando Gont
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] || [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1
Too optimistic:
! #define IPPORT_EPHEMERALLAST 655535
Otherwise the patch looks good to me. It looked a bit strange in unified
diff format, I needed to look at it in context format. (Strange, since I
usually prefer unified.)
Rui, were you going to get this committed?
-Mike
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
