On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 11:23:16PM -0600, Mike Silbersack wrote: > > > On Mon, 3 Mar 2008, Fernando Gont wrote: > >> At 04:11 a.m. 03/03/2008, Mike Silbersack wrote: >> >>>> Here's the same patch, but with the first ephemeral port changed from >>>> 1024 to 10000. >>> >>> Now that I've actually gone to try to apply the patch (so I can view the >>> two codepaths side by side, rather than in diff form), I'm finding that I >>> can't apply it. I think all the whitespace got stomped, either by your >>> mail program or my mail program. Can you please resent this as an >>> attachment? >> >> Sure. Please let me know if this one is okay. >> >> Kind regards, >> >> -- >> Fernando Gont >> e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] || [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1 > > Too optimistic: > > ! #define IPPORT_EPHEMERALLAST 655535 > > Otherwise the patch looks good to me. It looked a bit strange in unified > diff format, I needed to look at it in context format. (Strange, since I > usually prefer unified.) > > Rui, were you going to get this committed?
Yup, I will. Regards. -- Rui Paulo _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
