Sergey Matveychuk wrote
in <4f196d64.6020...@semmy.ru>:
se> 20.01.2012 10:52, Attila Nagy wrote:
se> > Hi,
se> >
se> > Having multiple routing tables is a very nice and (was a) long awaited
se> > capability in FreeBSD. Having it since years is even more cool,
se> > because
se> > we can assume i
20.01.2012 10:52, Attila Nagy wrote:
Hi,
Having multiple routing tables is a very nice and (was a) long awaited
capability in FreeBSD. Having it since years is even more cool, because
we can assume it's stable now.
But not having infrastructure support for it sucks, this makes people
hacking wit
Здравствуйте
On 01/20/12 08:15, Коньков Евгений wrote:
Здравствуйте, Attila.
Вы писали 20 января 2012 г., 8:52:47:
AN> Hi,
AN> Having multiple routing tables is a very nice and (was a) long awaited
AN> capability in FreeBSD. Having it since years is even more cool, because
AN> we can assu
Здравствуйте, Attila.
Вы писали 20 января 2012 г., 8:52:47:
AN> Hi,
AN> Having multiple routing tables is a very nice and (was a) long awaited
AN> capability in FreeBSD. Having it since years is even more cool, because
AN> we can assume it's stable now.
AN> But not having infrastructure support
Hi,
Having multiple routing tables is a very nice and (was a) long awaited
capability in FreeBSD. Having it since years is even more cool, because
we can assume it's stable now.
But not having infrastructure support for it sucks, this makes people
hacking with rc.local or various scripts in va
