Здравствуйте, Attila. Вы писали 20 января 2012 г., 8:52:47:
AN> Hi, AN> Having multiple routing tables is a very nice and (was a) long awaited AN> capability in FreeBSD. Having it since years is even more cool, because AN> we can assume it's stable now. AN> But not having infrastructure support for it sucks, this makes people AN> hacking with rc.local or various scripts in various places. AN> There is a(t least one) PR about it: conf/145440, which proposes a AN> standard method for setting up different FIBs in a seems to be logical AN> way, which is compatible with the current single routing table method of AN> static_routes. AN> Are there any objections about this PR? Is there something we can do to AN> get it committed? I have a patch http://kes.net.ua/softdev/fib_patch.html AN> Thanks, AN> _______________________________________________ AN> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list AN> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net AN> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" -- С уважением, Коньков mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
