Sergey Matveychuk <s...@semmy.ru> wrote in <4f196d64.6020...@semmy.ru>:
se> 20.01.2012 10:52, Attila Nagy wrote: se> > Hi, se> > se> > Having multiple routing tables is a very nice and (was a) long awaited se> > capability in FreeBSD. Having it since years is even more cool, se> > because se> > we can assume it's stable now. se> > But not having infrastructure support for it sucks, this makes people se> > hacking with rc.local or various scripts in various places. se> > se> > There is a(t least one) PR about it: conf/145440, which proposes a se> > standard method for setting up different FIBs in a seems to be logical se> > way, which is compatible with the current single routing table method se> > of se> > static_routes. se> > se> > Are there any objections about this PR? Is there something we can do se> > to se> > get it committed? se> > se> se> se> JFYI conf/132476 I'll take a look at these patches and try to merge. -- Hiroki
pgpPagYsRO1qy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
