ter/Makefile#L30
preset in https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/blob/master/Makefile#L416
> The code review is here if anyone's interested in looking at the
> implementation: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D46411
A+
Dave
fi
route add default $router >/dev/null 2>&1
fi
fi
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=241792 for more details.
Would be great to have this in CURRENT and MFC'd to 13.x and 12.x too if
possible.
A+
Dave
72800;
option dhcp-message-type 5;
option dhcp-server-identifier 139.178.78.140;
renew 1 2022/6/27 18:40:06;
rebind 2 2022/6/28 12:40:06;
expire 2 2022/6/28 18:40:06;
}
A+
Dave
work to craft something specific
for your use case.
Please post back to the list with your specific findings and nic/ tcp tunables,
these are very helpful for the next person!
Dave
nning into some limitations or thresholds for if_tap? lo has no trouble
soaking up this number of aliases.
thanks
Dave
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to &q
ums and mailing lists with ones that work
> > for both USB and iNICs.
>
> > Dave
>
> NDIS is not dependable in my experience, and I have had instances of
> the kernel failing to compile with NDIS.
Not surprised to hear that.
> How dependable are USB Ethernet dongles
onsider getting a 2nd hand intel NIC. I can get a
4 port pci intel Gb for under 100$ years which is more than sufficient. Lower
spec cards will be even cheaper.
There are references on the forums and mailing lists with ones that work for
both USB and iNICs.
Dave
list:
I'm focused on technical feasibility only at the moment and getting
ready for a "moonshot" talk at netdevconf march 21st , and I'd while
I'd dearly appreciate folk trying some "interesting" patches and
providing feedback
(https://github.com/dtaht/ipv4-cleanup/tree/master/patches ) am
totally
On Tue, 26 Jun 2018, at 09:52, Dave Cottlehuber wrote:
>
> The HPET NMI watchdog patch was very timely - works a treat:
> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D15630
>
> > However each time there's no crashdump, & the usual ctrl-alt-esc does't
> > work either.
&g
sk 0x
inet 10.241.0.4 netmask 0x
inet 10.241.0.5 netmask 0x
inet 10.241.0.6 netmask 0x
...
thanks everybody for the patches and the insight.
FWIW the alternative (original breaking config) also works again:
# jail networks
cloned_in
On Mon, 25 Jun 2018, at 23:08, Dave Cottlehuber wrote:
> [cross-posting for advice on general debugging + network-specific thoughts]
The HPET NMI watchdog patch was very timely - works a treat:
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D15630
> However each time there's no crashdump, & the usu
hung?
- dmesg, rc.conf, ifconfig, sysctls etc https://git.io/f4HQZ
- supermicro X10SRA-F bios v2.0a settings https://git.io/f4HQb
A+
Dave
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
plugdaemon a shot.
>
> Just an update in case anyone is interested...
>
> Bounce is still dying occasionally
net/haproxy is superb for this and logs extensively with a handy admin
interface as well.
Ask offlist if you’d like some help getting set up.
Dave
__
On Wed, 30 May 2018, at 17:46, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > > > > > ifconfig_lo1_aliases="inet 10.241.0.0-15/16"
> > > > > > lo1: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384
> > > > > > inet 10.241.0.0 netmask 0x
> > > > > > inet 10.241.0.1 netmask 0x
> > > > > > inet 10.2
On Wed, 30 May 2018, at 15:40, Dave Cottlehuber wrote:
> I have 10.241.0.0-15/16 bound to lo1 for jails, and I just realised it>
> doesn't work anymore. Boxes at $DAYJOB use the same config and
> work just> fine on 11.1R/amd64, otherwise I'd be fired this used to wor
I have 10.241.0.0-15/16 bound to lo1 for jails, and I just realised it doesn't
work anymore. Boxes at $DAYJOB use the same config and work just fine on
11.1R/amd64, otherwise I'd be fired this used to work ~ 1 month ago, both
on my desktop, and my laptop, and now doesn't.
Have I mis-config
On Thu, 14 Sep 2017, at 23:32, Kristof Provost wrote:
> On 14 Sep 2017, at 16:21, Dave Cottlehuber wrote:
> > Outgoing traffic (from a jail) via PF NAT over a LAGG/LACP sometimes
> > has the *backup* CARP IP address assigned to it.
> >
> I think this is your problem. You
Hi,
Outgoing traffic (from a jail) via PF NAT over a LAGG/LACP sometimes has
the *backup* CARP IP address assigned to it.
Obivously as this IP is only active on the "other" server, the return
TCP connection traffic never actually gets back to our CARP master, and
the other server sees spurious TC
.0.5 netmask 0x
inet 10.241.0.4 netmask 0x
nd6 options=29
groups: lo
# /etc/pf.conf snippet
protocols = "{ tcp, udp, icmp }"
extl_if="lagg0"
jail_if="lo1"
jail_net = $jail_if:network
nat on $extl_if proto $protocols fr
On Apr 1, 2014, at 10:29 AM, Robert Huff wrote:
>
> Synopsis of my (apparent) problem: DISCOVER, OFFER, REQUEST,
> and ACKNOWLEDGEMENT all happen correctly ... but the information
> doesn't make it to ifconfig or the routing table.
Have you tried commenting everything out of dhclient.conf
On Apr 1, 2014, at 7:48 AM, Rick Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Robert Huff wrote:
>
>>[Please keep me CC'd as I am not subscribed. Thanks.]
>>
>>I have a system, running r263263, where dhclient is misbehaving.
>> (Yes - this is CURRENT, but I have no reason
On Jan 26, 2013, at 7:05 AM, h bagade wrote:
> I've found a patch which is going to do what I really want:
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2010-December/027196.html
>
> but when I apply it on my freebsd 8.2 with em cards, nothing happens! not
> even sysctl "dev.em.X.down_disables
E COUPON CODE "HALL" ON CHECKOUT
Promogoons.com : http://promogoons.com | The Major Label's Dirty Little Secret
Dave George - 678 508 2941 - sa...@promogoons.com : mailto:sa...@promogoons.com
Skype | Yahoo | AIM : Promogoons
United Promotions - po box 1526 - atlanta - GA - 3
2011/10/12 Mikolaj Golub wrote:
>
> On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 09:53:34 +0800 dave jones wrote:
>
> dj> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 9:12 AM, dave jones wrote:
> >> 2011/10/4 Mikolaj Golub :
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, 1 Oct 2011 14:15:45 +0800 dave jones wrote:
&g
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 9:12 AM, dave jones wrote:
> 2011/10/4 Mikolaj Golub :
>>
>> On Sat, 1 Oct 2011 14:15:45 +0800 dave jones wrote:
>>
>> dj> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Robert Watson wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, 28 Sep 2011, Mikolaj
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 12:58 AM, Marius Strobl wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 10:34:58AM +0800, dave jones wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Does FreeBSD have gpio bitbang api for MII? If not, any driver in tree using
>> gpio-bitbang mii that I can refer to? Thanks.
>>
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Aleksandr Rybalko wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Oct 2011 10:34:58 +0800
> dave jones wrote:
>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Does FreeBSD have gpio bitbang api for MII? If not, any driver in
>>> tree using gpio-bitbang mii that I can refer to?
Hi,
Does FreeBSD have gpio bitbang api for MII? If not, any driver in tree using
gpio-bitbang mii that I can refer to? Thanks.
It seems like OpenBSD, NetBSD and Linux have added support to gpio bitbang mii,
and it's useful for porting embedded devices.
Best regards,
2011/10/4 Mikolaj Golub :
>
> On Sat, 1 Oct 2011 14:15:45 +0800 dave jones wrote:
>
> dj> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Robert Watson wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, 28 Sep 2011, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 16:12:55 +02
e correct
> invariant is that inp_socket is safe to follow unconditionally if an inpcb
> is locked and INP_DROPPED isn't set -- the bug is in "locked" not in
> "INP_DROPPED", which is why I think this is the wrong fix, even though it
>
;t get "too lost". :-)
What are you waiting for? The issue is reproducible. If you're running
FreeBSD 9 with Mikolaj's test_udp program, you'll get the kernel panic.
I think sysadmins won't be happy about this...
> Adrian
Best regards,
Dave.
m hashed lists, like it is done for tcp_close().
>
> With this patch I don't observe the panic.
Hi Mikolaj,
You rock! Machines have been running hours without panic after
applying your patch.
You should commit the atch asap :-) Thank you for your help!
Best regards,
Dave.
__
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 8:51 PM, dave jones wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 1:12 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>&
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 1:12 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 12:43 AM, dave jones wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I have two production machines running on freebsd 9.0-b
Hi,
I have two production machines running on freebsd 9.0-beta2 and both got
kernel panic related to networking. Any idea how to solve it? thanks.
http://http://60.248.161.9/p1.jpg
http://http://60.248.161.9/p2.jpg
Regards,
Dave.
___
freebsd-net
Hi all
An IPFW problem?
An help gladly accepted
It would appear Port 80 closed
Ports 21 25 443 587 998 work well
rc.conf
defaultrouter="192.168.0.1"
gateway_enable="YES"
hostname="xxx.xxx.xxx"
ifconfig_re0="inet 192.168.0.11 netmask 255.255.255.0"
ifconfig_re1="inet 192.168.1.2 netmask 255.2
Hi all
An IPFW problem when going from release to stable on 8.2
An help gladly accepted
LOG ON
Flushed all rules.
00010 allow ip from 127.0.0.1 to 127.0.0.1 via lo0
00030 divert 8668 ip from any to any via bge0
ipfw: getsockopt(IP_FW_ADD): Invalid argument
5 allow ip from any to any
Firewa
p;sa, 0, sizeof(sa));
sa.sin_addr.s_addr = htonl(INADDR_ANY);
val = connect(sockfd, (struct sockaddr *)&sa, sizeof(sa));
the return value of val still -1. Any idea? Thanks.
Regards,
Dave.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/ma
I haven't looked at the vnet jails, yet. Will do. Thanks.
Kind regards,
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Julian Elischer
To: d...@seddon.ca
Cc: Andrew Hannam , FreeBSD Net
, Robert Watson
Subject: Re: FreeBSD route tables limited 16?
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 17:56:37 -0700
Mailer: Mozi
Hello,
It seems that FreeBSD's tftpd doesn't support multicast.
Does anyone know which multicast tftpd available on FreeBSD?
Thank you.
Regards,
Dave.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/free
idea how to solve it? Thanks!
Best regards,
Dave.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Hi al
Installed 7.1 earlier and did a kernel update(after a src update) to 7.2.
The network cards appear to have stopped working.
They are using the "bce" driver
Do they to have to patched?
Regards
--
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http:
Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
> Dave, good day.
>
> Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 10:28:10PM +1030, Dave Edwards wrote:
>
>> I've tried creating a host route for the nmap target instead of relying
>> on the default route and I've tried three other versions of nmap. As
Hi,
I'm having some problems with nmap over the tun device. I connect to
the net using ppp and pppoe (adsl) which creates the "tun0" device. My
default route goes out that way.
Using nmap to try to map an external host:
-
# nmap -vvv -e tun0 -sS -p80,443 1.2.3.4
Startin
RNING: /var was not properly dismounted
/var: mount pending error: blocks 12 files 3
WARNING: /disk2 was not properly dismounted
WARNING: attempt to net_add_domain(netgraph) after domainfinalize()
fxp0: link state changed to UP
vr0: link state changed to UP
any help, hints, clues or just
lable
ping: sendto: No buffer space available
ping: sendto: No buffer space available
64 bytes from x.x.x.x: icmp_seq=35 ttl=255 time=0.294 ms
It hasn't happened again (and I hope it doesn't) - but is that something I
should look for?
Thank you again - very much
Dave
-Original Me
# sysctl -a | fgrep ip.intr_qu
net.inet.ip.intr_queue_maxlen: 50
net.inet.ip.intr_queue_drops: 9506223
What do those drops mean?
Thanks
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Ingo Flaschberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 9:28 PM
To: Dave Raven
Cc: freebsd-net
Hi Ingo,
# netstat -m
4078/14240/67584 mbufs in use (current/peak/max):
4078 mbufs allocated to data
4065/14168/33792 mbuf clusters in use (current/peak/max)
Thanks
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Ingo Flaschberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 9:21
Also - sometimes during my testing I see this message, it's hard to make it
happen but its been popping up I'm not sure if its related/different etc --
"sendto: No buffer space available"
Thanks
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Ingo Flaschberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
ocessor
is idle and it only happens after a day or more?
A netstat -na|wc -l gives over 7000 connections, but that shouldn't be a
problem? I have plenty mbufs and mbuf clusters available ..
Thanks
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Ingo Flaschberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesd
) around 80-90mbits, but
the processor is 75% idle..
The other strange this is that a reboot solves this, and it takes around 1-2
days to happen again..
Thanks
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Ingo Flaschberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 8:33 PM
To: Dave Raven
Cc
Hi,
Unfortunately I don't have most of that information, I can try to
get more but my question is if hping works and ping doesn't shouldn't I be
looking on the box itself not at the network ?
Thanks again
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Ingo Flaschberger [mailto:[
Hi,
Its hard to tell but it appears like all protocols are dropping.
Thanks
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Ingo Flaschberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 8:04 PM
To: Dave Raven
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: Hping/Ping
Dear Daven
be a problem on the unit (a
buffer or something perhaps) seeing as hping works fine?
Thanks again
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Ingo Flaschberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 7:50 PM
To: Dave Raven
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: Hping/Ping
Dear
there is stable. That seems to indicate it's something card
specific, but hping never has a problem ?
Thanks for the help
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Ingo Flaschberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 7:34 PM
To: Dave Raven
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Sub
ho (ping) request
46 22.215133 y.y.y.y -> x.x.x.x ICMP Echo (ping) reply
46/2 (request/reply) = 23. So 23 packets actually went out and returned, yet
I still get drops?
Thanks again
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Dave Raven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008
ome buffer filling up? Where can I look to try get more
information. Any help/suggestions would be muchly appreciated
Thanks
Dave
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send a
ne it's on,
but for machines behind it this presents a problem. They run freshclam for
virus updating, csup or portsnap, fetch, and portupgrade and maybe others
not sure if i remembered them all. Is there a simple way i can configure
this box to deal with the new proxy
Hi,
Thanks for your reply. Do you know how far along this patch is or any
configs needed to pull this off?
Thanks.
Dave.
- Original Message -
From: "Alfred Perlstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2
Hello,
Firewalling nfs i was reading some client docs and i found out that
FreeBSD has client support for the nfs v4. I was wondering if FreeBSD 6.2
could act as an nfs v4 server?
Thanks.
Dave.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http
049 flags S/SA keep state
pass in quick on $ext_if inet proto tcp from to $ext_if port 986
flags S/SA keep state
pass in quick on $ext_if inet proto udp from to $ext_if port 669
keep state
The only thing i'm not sure of is whether any of the ports will change if
the box is rebooted, i'
home directories to five or six
different linux machines, some ubuntu and most centos5 and i remember
vaguely reading about nfs v4. If anyone has this working i'd appreciate
pointers.
Thanks.
Dave.
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce M. Simpson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
oing so here will
* not preserve ordering so instead we fallback to
* guaranteeing order only from dispatch points
* in the system (see above).
*/
ni->ni_handler(m);
--
Dave Baukus
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
972-47
to slowly count up to TCP_MAXRXTSHIFT;
once TCP_MAXRXTSHIFT is exceeded tcp_timer_rexmt() will
kill the poor innocent TCP.
On 02/01/07 17:23, Dave Baukus wrote:
There is a bug tcp_output() for at least freeBSD6.1
that causes a perfectly good TCP to be dropped by its
retransmit timer; the application
45 -v -b 128000 -t 192.168.222.222
ttcp -s -l 16384 -p 9446 -v -b 128000 -r
ttcp -s -l 16384 -p 9447 -v -b 128000 -r
ttcp -s -l 16384 -p 9448 -v -b 128000 -r
ttcp -s -l 16384 -p 9449 -v -b 128000 -r
ttcp -s -l 16384 -p 9450 -v -b 128000 -r
--
Dave Baukus
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fujitsu Network
Hi,
Is anyone working on implementing UDP lite in FreeBSD? If not,
I'd like to work on it.
BR,
Dave.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 04:44:38PM -1000, Dave Cornejo wrote:
> > So the question is whether these cards, regardless of their affect on
> > throughput, increase usable CPU cycles? I have several Soekris 1401
> > cards and am wondering if there would be any point to putti
RAM, Intel MBs, mostly
on-board peripherals.
dave c
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> Dave Cornejo wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Some time ago (Oct 2004) there was some talk of implementing
> > IP_SENDIF, a search of the mailing list turns up nothing since then.
> > Did anything ever happen with this?
>
> Can you please explain
Hi,
Some time ago (Oct 2004) there was some talk of implementing
IP_SENDIF, a search of the mailing list turns up nothing since then.
Did anything ever happen with this?
thanks,
dave c
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
Hi all
I am having a problem with ipfw.
Please have a look at www.pastebin.com/597707
I could not ping anything so I hashed out line 62 & 70
Now I can ping 192.168.0.2 but not 192.168.0.1.
Also browsing and email is not working.
Thanks
Regards
_
Thanks for the reply - I went down to the office to do exactly what you are
suggesting and it worked fine - removed "em_enable_vlans(adapter);"
Thanks all
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Doug Ambrisko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 January 2006 10:04 PM
To: Dave Raven
lan1 vlan 100 vlandev em1
If I change to using fxp it immediately works..
Thanks for the help
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Gleb Smirnoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 January 2006 04:59 PM
To: Dave Raven
Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: em driver + VLAN's
On Wed, Ja
SD in some way?
Thanks
Dave
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
d appreciate
it. My thought was turn off the dhcp server on the belkin router and let the
original fbsd server's dhcp server handle it, but i'm not sure if doing so
will disable it's ability to accept wireless clients. I'd also like the
wireless network t
so googled someone saying
1504 - also not working.
Does anyone have any advice?
Thanks
Dave
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
ange the ttl on the port 21 session, without dropping the
session?
Or can I change the ruleset to allow everything without dropping the
session?
Regards,
Dave
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
100
#define MAX_POLL_BURST_MAX 1
I tried doing this, but encountered the problems with the throughput somehow
related to the em cards and gave up. Maybe you're results will be better.
Regards,
Dave Seddon
Ferdinand Goldmann writes:
Kevin Day wrote:
In one case, we had a sys
er (Copper)'
class= network
subclass = ethernet
----
Dave
Darren Pilgrim writes:
[Reflowed]
From: Benjamin Rosenblum
Darren Pilgrim wrote:
I'd be interested in finding out the specific chips with which people
are (not) having success. As em(4) supports an ent
0s I started using the onboard
broadcom cards (bge). They work great, although I don't seem to be able to
get near line rate either. I've been severing up < 10 files from MFS via
thttpd. I get about 80MB/s only. :(
Regards,
Dave
Jeremie Le Hen writes:
Hi Benjamin, Ferdinant,
niffing 150MB/s. Normally libpcap can't
handle that amount of traffic.
Regards,
Dave Seddon
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Greetings,
Yes I was wondering about doing that the other day. I'd like to here how
you go if you do get somewhere. Perhaps this is how the load generators
work? I've been using one based on SmartBits, which seems to be linux.
Dave
Nickolay Kritsky writes:
combination of t
There seem to be serious issues around this driver. There have been many
posts on this list in the last days particularly, as well as over the last
few months. People seem to be looking at it, and I guess once we all rush
out and by other (e.g. broadcom) NICs intel might try to help.
dave
Can we try running the windows drivers? Wasn't that called project evil.
Dave
Scott M. Ferris writes:
On 9/26/05, Petri Helenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does anyone have the programming data for the chipsets so the driver
could be taken further? I've been unable to
So ditch pf and let us know. Or swap to ipf
Z.C.B. writes:
I am positive it is something to do with pf. I copied the exact same
config file from the vpn server over to another box and pointed the
client at it and it worked perfectly fine. Any one see any thing odd
in that pf setup or have any
tt boot time - see above.
#kern.ipc.nmbclusters: 25600
-
Regards,
Dave
Chuck Swiger writes:
Matthew Jakeman wrote:
Some colleagues and myself have performed some simple tests on various
OS's using iperf to simply fire packets from one pc to another over
ethernet to te
?
Regarding the below issue- what about spanning tree? Is portfast enabled?
Regards,
Dave
Maxim Tuliuk writes:
On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 14:15 -0400, Benjamin Rosenblum wrote:
...
now the EM problem.
when i am running a very high network load (streaming video, dumping
ALOT of data across the
ISP does drop ICMP then the
don't defragment option will just result in packets disappearing anyway.
Regards,
Dave Seddon
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
30]: #4 pf rule removal failed: Invalid
argument
Any help appreciated, i'd really like to get this going.
Thanks.
Dave.
# pf.conf
# for use on gateway box
# Required order: options, normalization, queueing, translation, filtering.
# Macros and tables may be defined and used anywhere.
# N
skipto
man ipfw -> e.g. ipfw add 10 skipto 4000 all from any to any layer2 out
Brett Glass writes:
For years, we've used "Dummynet" in FreeBSD for bandwidth control.
Unfortunately, the semantics of IPFW can, at times, make the use of
Dummynet awkward and inefficient. For example, suppose
It would also be interesting to know if you've got device polling enabled.
If so, what sysctl settings do you have.
Regards,
Dave Seddon
Mike Tancsa writes:
On Sun, 18 Sep 2005 14:15:51 -0400, in sentex.lists.freebsd.net you
wrote:
Im having an issue with my new linksys eg103
t;YES"
firewall_type="closed"
Regards,
Dave
Boris Karloff writes:
Hello:
How do I cause freeBSD 5.4 to not respond to an nmap
inquiry? I have already tried creating a line in rc.firewall
that says:
${fwcmd} deny all from any to any
${fwcmd} drop all from any to any
I k
Or just
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
spanning-tree portfast
Or disable spanning tree
no spanning-tree vlan 1-100
You could also do some MAC address filtering as the BPDUs are ethernet
multicast, but that smacks of hard work. :)
Peter Wood writes:
Sods law, after working on this f
Greetings,
You need a seperate routing table. Try using Xen
(http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/Research/SRG/netos/xen/), or there's a patch
floating around for FreeBSD4.9.
Dave
Barney Wolff writes:
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 09:58:14AM -0500, Will Maier wrote:
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 10:36
What ISP is it? You sure the ISP doesn't use PPPeE?
Dave
Digital Brain writes:
Hi Chuck and thanks for your reply -- unfortunately dhclient still fails
to get an IP...
Here's a copy of my dhclient.conf:
#dhclient config for interface ed0
interface "ed0"
ance
the load across multiple gig links with traffic going to a sinlge backup
host, for example. (I you want to know how I'll have to look that up)
Regards,
Dave Seddon
Evgueni V. Gavrilov writes:
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
IP addresses. It would be cool
Greetings,
- Gig cards are cheap.
- PCI bus throughput is really bad (like 32MB/s)
- There is no easy way to "bond" on FreeBSD, but you can just use multiple
IP addresses. It would be cool to have something like Etherchannel, but
that doesn't work. Solaris has Etherchannel.
Greetings,
Also, how were you measuring the packet and data rate? What were you using
to generate the traffic?
I used /usr/ports/benchmark/siege and /usr/ports/www/thttpd.
Regards,
Dave
Mao Shou Yan writes:
Hi, all,
I have a machine with 3 Intel pro1000 cards.
em0 is in
=1024
I still get lots of kern.polling.lost_polls and kern.polling.suspect.
How do you edit the RXD is 256, TXD is 256?
How do you view the errors when you set "sysctl hw.em0.stats=1"?
Regards,
Dave
Mao Shou Yan writes:
Hi, all,
I have a machine with 3 Intel pro1000 cards.
uot;
So you want:
ifconfig_dc0="100baseTX mediaopt full-duplex"
ifconfig_dc1="100baseTX mediaopt full-duplex"
Regards,
Dave Seddon
dave writes:
Hello,
I'm trying to get a pair of netgear cards to work on a 5.4-RELEASE-p6
box. My rc.conf looks as follows:
if
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
