Hello, recently after enabling ipv6_privacy in /etc/rc.conf and rebooting, I've
been unable to get IPv6 connectivity to work in a hosted environment. (I don't
know if this is a red herring or not.) I've tried disabling it, and even after
rebooting, it still doesn't work. (Doesn't work meaning: I
versatility (suitable for all skin types) combined with an affordable price
means that customers make an informed choice of a product among others
available on the market.
Are you interested in cooperation?
William Jones
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
versatility (suitable for all skin types) combined with an affordable price
means that customers make an informed choice of a product among others
available on the market.
Are you interested in cooperation?
William Jones
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
, it’s possible that you don’t get any reply if they do some nasty
> things on their network (as Hetzner does). In that case, you’re stuck on
> the /56 setup.
>
As you can see, it seems there is no restriction / too nasty things at
OVH, as I have got replies, at least :)
Regards,
--
W
DP, Andrey, this is what made us on the
track. :)
Btw, if I wanted to use link local addresses to communicate with the
provider next hop gateway, how can I know the local link fe80 IPv6
address of that gateway since my provider (OVH) doesn't disclose it?
Regards,
And thanks again for your hel
s.
Thanks in advance for your time / help.
Regards.
--
William Gathoye
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Patrick Lamaiziere writes:
> As openbgpd(*) looks broken for the BGP password, is there any BGP
> daemon that works with tcp md5 signature (using setkey and ipsec of
we are not doing this in production right now, but i am pretty sure that
we successfully in the lab with bird.
_
ments also hurt -- we are a shoestring operation so keeping
a copy of the tables of each border router (so we have enough
information to do the reconstruction according to the source of the
flow data) seems wasteful.
Cheers,
-w
--
William Waites | School of Informatics
http://tardis.ed
necessary.
> As to the ng_netflow hook, +1, excellent idea.
Great!
-w
--
William Waites | School of Informatics
http://tardis.ed.ac.uk/~wwaites/ | University of Edinburgh
http://www.hubs.net.uk/| HUBS AS60241
The University of Edinburgh is a charitab
and can export
> this data.
Hi Nikolay. Thanks, we are actually doing exactly that, so there's no
immediate pressure. It's just not the most elegant solution for
various reasons.
-w
--
William Waites | School of Informatics
http://tardis.ed.ac.uk/~wwaites/ | Universi
this though? I wasn't able to
find much by searching the list archives. It may be that I will soon
have some students that I can set on this task but would not like to
unnecessarily duplicate effort.
Cheers,
-w
--
William Waites | School of Informatics
http://tardis.ed.ac.uk/~wwaites/
s=143
ifmaxaddr 0 port 13 priority 128 path cost 2000
member: epair4a flags=143
ifmaxaddr 0 port 12 priority 128 path cost 2000
member: em0.100 flags=143
ifmaxaddr 0 port 4 priority 128 path cost 2
--
William Katsak
Ph.D. St
Hi All,
For the last couple of months i have been pulling my hair out
trying to solve this problem.
We have a 1Gbps transatlantic link from the UK to the US, which has
successfully passed the RFC2544 test.
At either end, we have a media converter, and a supermicro server with an
intel qua
Hi All,
I have just got a couple of 10GbE intel X520-DA2 cards to test. Im
running freebsd 8.1 on a super micro intel xeon server, and a hp core 2 duo
workstation, both machines have 4gb of ram.
Both are attached via sfp+ cables to a brocade turbo iron switch, which
simply has jumbo frames
hang.
Is there something I'm missing here in my configuration?
Thanks for your time, please CC me on emails as I am not subscribed to the list.
Regards,
William
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fr
Lenar D. Tukhvatullin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "William D. Colburn (aka Schlake)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: 9 second ping lag unless I run tcpdump on RELENG_5
>
>On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 08:56:54AM -0600, William D. Colburn (a
opped back to normal.
The uname ids it as 5.3-STABLE #14: Wed Oct 20 10:23:11 UTC 2004,
with a GENERIC kernel. I did a new cvsup (along with a tcpdump because
otherwise cvsup fails) this morning and nothing new came across.
--
William Colburn, "Sysprog" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
C
ncremented.
In sum, it isn't really "counted as unicast" at all. It's simply
counted as an outgoing packet, just like all the other outgoing packets.
--
William A. Carrel
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/ma
apable interfaces. As opposed to needing hit another knob
elsewhere, since this one already has the "control where I send stuff
out" purpose.
(Pardon me ignoring the broadcast case here...)
--
William A. Carrel
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
I've been told thirdhand that there has been some amount of
handwringing regarding this PR. My impression is that the worries
mainly surround the fact that certain programs may depend on the fairly
sparsely documented (http://www.kohala.com/start/mcast.api.txt)
behavior currently shown. Chang
I've filed PR's with a patch for this issue now to most of the affected
operating systems. It's basically anything derived from 4.4BSDLite
that hasn't already corrected for this issue.
FreeBSD: kern/58359
NetBSD: kern/23221
OpenDarwin: bugzilla id 1062
OpenBSD: no reply, I'll refile later this
On Tuesday, October 21, 2003, at 12:59PM, Joshua Graessley wrote:
On Oct 21, 2003, at 12:28 PM, William A.Carrel wrote:
I have two such sockets set up, one on each of the interfaces I'm
interested in. The problem is that a packet that comes in on one
interface winds up in the receive
I've been working on a miniature multicast routing program and am
encountering some troubles with getting setsockopt(2) to create the
right behavior.
I pass in
setsockopt(the_sock, IP_ADD_MEMBERSHIP, &the_mreq);
with the_mreq having in_addr's for the link-local multicast channel I'm
interested
help!! I really appreciate it!
Kindest Regards,
Bill
-Original Message-
From: Don Bowman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 7:33 PM
To: 'William Knechtel'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Help with FreeBSD Bridged Firewall
> From: William Knechtel [mailto:[EM
this helps figure out what's going on!! Thanks in advance for your
help.
Kindest Regards,
Bill
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of William Knechtel
> Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 6:56 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
&g
Hello!
Help!! I'm running a PC with dual NICs and FreeBSD 4.8 for a bridged
firewall. I've got a private IP 10.0.0.1 tied to the internal card on the
box for remote management. The firewall blocks any 10.x traffic coming in on
the external card, so to remotely admin it, I have to shell into a mach
Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world, Boris Georgiev
had to walk into mine and say:
> Hi Bill,
>
> Sorry for the previous e-mail, but have in mind that I'm trying to cooperate
> by testing your drivers and
> I am not aware of the rules for declaring a hardware problem in the ma
Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world, Boris Georgiev
had to walk into mine and say:
> Kenneth,
>
> As I already posted William, I have bad news - it doesn't work for me. I
> rebuilt kernel yesterday with
> the patched sources and the only thing that happene
life ones not
being prefitted with a useful amount of memory.
I'd be very grateful if ISA support and the f00f workaround stayed in
FreeBSD for a long time yet.
Regards,
William Palfreman.
--
W. Palfreman. I'm looking for a job:
Tel: 0771 355 0354 http://www.pal
29 matches
Mail list logo
