about.
Thanks,
- Tom
throughout the post to encourage engagement.
- Tom
'm happy to get them
via email, irc, slack, discord, the fediverse or in the street (if you
can find me).
If you see value in me continuing to write these reports I would love to
hear that too. I won't commit to writing them forever, but I will
continue at least until I break for the winter.
Thanks
Tom
ity and are looking forward to
users reporting their success running VPP on FreeBSD or any issues they
encounter.
I look forward to your feedback.
Tom
uot; for actual usage. Marco's paper
might be a good starting point for further digging:
https://papers.freebsd.org/2003/zec-vimage/
Tom
breaks and the VPP
configurations that FreeBSD users expect to be available.
Thanks
Tom
On Sat, Feb 3, 2024, at 20:20, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> I there any public source repository for the development of VPP on
> FreeBSD? Any link to follow?
>
> Benoît
I’m working to upstream changes right now and plan to start a development
branch early next week.
- Tom
On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 02:55:21PM +0200, tue...@freebsd.org wrote:
> > On 26. Oct 2022, at 10:57, Tom Jones wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 22, 2022 at 12:14:25PM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Some thoughts about this topic.
>
here, but if not I'm happy to
send anyone a pdf.
- Tom
Hey Meka
You say DHCPD (which to me means the DHCP daemon) but you also mention
"DHCP client"?
I assume the software can be one or the other but not both. Which of
the two do you
mean?
Or is there something I am missing?
Regards,
Tom
On Thu, 26 Nov 2020 at 11:42, Goran Mekić via f
ote:
> > 27.05.2020 15:06, Tom Marcoen wrote:
> >
> >> Hey all,
> >>
> >> I'm new to this mailing list and also quite new to FreeBSD (huray,
> welcome
> >> to me!) so bare with me, please.
> >>
> >> I'm reading up on Netgraph on
Netgraph.
I don't understand why is everythin doing everything they can _not_ to use
Netgraph?
On Mon, 8 Jun 2020 at 13:47, Jan Bramkamp wrote:
> On 27.05.20 10:06, Tom Marcoen wrote:
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I'm new to this mailing list and also quite new to FreeBSD (
12:13 PM, Tom Marcoen wrote:
> > Hey Eugen,
> >
> > For some reason I did not receive your email. But I found your reply in
> the
> > archives.
> >
> > Anyway, the goal is to have two computers, each with a Netgraph bridge
> node
> > and jails connecting
encrypting that with IPsec or
wireguard or would be an option, but it would be nicer if I could use
a Netgraph-native option.
Regards,
Tom
On Wed, 27 May 2020 at 10:06, Tom Marcoen wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I'm new to this mailing list and also quite new to FreeBSD (huray, welcom
receiving unencrypted
traffic on the inside hook and sending out encrypted traffic on the outside
hook.
Regards,
Tom
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freeb
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 11:29:50PM -0700, vm finance wrote:
> Ok - I see there is a socket option to pick a different cc per-socket
> basis.
> Any experiences on loading / using different cc per socket...does it work
> seamlessly?
I have not heard of any problems and have happily done recently:
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 10:34:40PM -0700, Rudy wrote:
>
> Here is a quick tool so show Packets Per Second on the CLI for all your
> interfaces (only tested with ix and igb).
> It uses the output of sysctl every second. If you like it, great!
>
How about:
$ systat -ifstat -pps
- [tj]
___
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 09:54:48AM +0200, Dries Michiels wrote:
>
> Tom,
>
> I’m using the igb (intel I210) driver for my LAN interface and the em
> (intel I219-V) driver for the WAN interface. I use this FreeBSD box
> as my home server so I wouldn’t say that it has a h
On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 05:14:49PM +0530, Harsh Jain wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We have observed memory leak with TCP network traffic in "newreno".
>
> Output of vmstat -m
>
> in_mfilter 3 3K - 3 1024
> in_multi 4 1K - 4 256
> ip_moptions 6
On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 08:30:28PM +0200, Dries Michiels wrote:
> Dear mailing list,
>
> After upgrading my FreeBSD server from source from:
> FreeBSD 11.1-STABLE (VADOS) #9 r331859: Sun Apr 1 12:09:18 CEST 2018
> to
> FreeBSD 11.2-PRERELEASE (VADOS) #10 r333091: Sun Apr 29 16:48:44 CEST 2018
>
On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 04:30:45PM -0400, Nick Wolff wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I currently have a review in to make carp use dscp values on outgoing
> packets. This will make it easier to preform QOS on modern switches as we
> have been able to drive carp insane on 10g links while throwing storage
> traff
appropriate contact.
Thank you and appreciate your time. I look forward to hearing from you.
Best Regards,
Tom Miller
From: Tom Miller [mailto:tmil...@pipeline4data.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2018 3:12 PM
To: 'freebsd-net@freebsd.org'
Subject: Defence and Security Pro
you would forward this email to the appropriate contact and
help me with the introduction.
Thank you and I look forward to hearing from you.
Regards,
Tom Miller
Database Professional
PL Data Inc.
If you don't wish to receive emails from us reply back with "Unsubscribe&quo
development for Freebsd 10 and freebsd 11 OS
Im wearing a White Shirt and Im a loud Irish Guy :/ if you can come
over and talk with me about how I can help and what is the process
then I would like to help you help my friend :)
Thanks
Tom Smyth
Hello HPS
Thank you for your help and your investigation on this.
I start a couple of additional test in the next few days and let you know if I
can find additional details.
Just to be sure:
What was the FreeBSD version you have tested with?
Best regards
Tom
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht
smit timeouts
0 retransmitted
0 retransmitted DATA chunks
0 fast retransmitted DATA chunks
0 TSN's marked for Fast Retran
Is that the information you are asking for?
Thank you for your time, I'm very interested in finding th
0 retransmitted DATA chunks
0 fast retransmitted DATA chunks
0 TSN's marked for Fast Retran
Is that the information you are asking for?
Thank you for your time, I'm very interested in finding the root cause for
this one.
Have a good day
Tom
# netstat -s
tcp:
From: Hans Petter Selasky [mailto:h...@selasky.org]
On 05/25/17 20:37, Tom Huerlimann wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have the problem, that I cannot reach more than 20-40Mbit/s when
>> using the
>> AX88179 chip (1Gbit/s NIC) on a USB 3.0 SuperSpeed Port (same on a
Did someone of you ever managed to reach a higher bandwidth with axge driver
and AX88179 chipset?
Best regards
-Tom
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
vlanpcp: 0 parent interface: bce0
groups: vlan
> On 11 Dec 2016, at 14:44, Tom Beard via freebsd-net
> wrote:
>
> Hi all
>
> I’m having issues with vlan handling on a bce interface on 11.0-RELEASE.
> From what I’ve read, the bce driver supports hardware vlan strip
looks like I can’t disable it leaving me with little option but to buy a new
network card.
Can anyone validate that I’m correct here and this is a known limitation or am
I barking up completely the wrong tree?
Thanks
Tom
bce0: mem 0xda00-0xdbff
irq 36 at device 0.0 on pci1
bce0
/sys/dev/netmap/ixgbe_netmap.h#L396
After that, your userspace application simply have to check for the NS_MOREFRAG
flag in the receive ring, and if it's set he knows the end of the packet will
follow in the next buf.
Tom
___
freebsd-net@freebs
[0]: https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=mod_cc
[1]:
https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=mod_cc&sektion=9&apropos=0&manpath=FreeBSD+10.1-RELEASE
[2]:
http://www.freesoftwaremagazine.com/articles/writing_a_kernel_module_for_freebsd
--
Tom
@adventureloop
adventurist.me
tf-tcpm-newcwv-00-td5882835.html
[3]:https://gnunet.org/sites/default/files/tcp_stealth_freebsd_10_0_0.diff
--
Tom
@adventureloop
adventurist.me
:wq
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To uns
interface (for now) and so
dhclient in ports would work for that.
Tom
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
> On Oct 31, 2014, at 11:43 PM, Tom Pusateri wrote:
>
>>
>> On Oct 31, 2014, at 11:23 PM, Chris Inacio wrote:
>>
>> My configs are really basic. dhcp6c.conf:
>>
>> interface re0 {
>>
>> send ia-pd 0;
>>
config is inconsistent.
You should change to sla-len 8 for a /56 or change the prefix to /60 for an
sla-len of 4.
dhcp6c should configure the delegated prefix on your downstream interface(s) if
configured correctly and rtadvd will advertise them automatically.
I have described my configurat
Lots of embedded devices (like Cisco IP Phones) send TFTP requests with 0
checksums.
Tom
> On Oct 1, 2014, at 12:58 PM, Michael Tuexen
> wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> in udp6_input() we have the following code:
>
>if (nxt == IPPROTO_UDP && plen != ulen) {
been out for a while.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Lars
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 2014-8-26, at 20:09, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>&g
that.
Is that what you're looking for? To see if someone is working on changes to
rtadvd?
Thanks,
Tom
> On Sep 6, 2014, at 6:46 PM, Garrett Wollman wrote:
>
> So is anyone working on an RFC 7217 ("Stable and Opaque IIDs with
> SLAAC") implementa
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 02:43:49PM +, Eggert, Lars wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the newcwv patch is probably stale now with Tom Jones' recent patch based on
> a more up-to-date version of the Internet-Draft, but the PRR patch should
> still be useful?
My newcwv patch is much more up
On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 03:19:20PM +0100, Tom Jones wrote:
>
> I have updated the patch to move the new variable introduced with newcwv into
> a
> struct within the tcpcb.
Forgot some files in the diff.
--
Tom | I don't see how we are going to build the d
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 09:53:59PM +0100, Tom Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 12:29:44PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Cool! Would you mind throwing it into a bugzilla ticket so it's not
> > lost and it can be assigned for some review?
> &g
pact to performance be by moving the state
out into a struct?
> On 30 June 2014 10:04, Tom Jones wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Attached is a patch which implements draft-ietf-tcpm-newcwv-06, "Updating
> > TCP
> > to support Rate-Limited Traffic". T
Hello,
Attached is a patch which implements draft-ietf-tcpm-newcwv-06, "Updating TCP
to support Rate-Limited Traffic". The patch is a port of the Linux
implementation by Raffaello Secchi with influence from Aris
Angelogiannopoulos's patch set that was sent to the list earlier this
>
> > [prr.patch]
> >
> > [newcwv.patch]
>
> Apologies for not looking at this as yet. It is now closer to the top of my
> list.
>
> Best,
> George
Hi George,
I have a set of patches for draft-ietf-tcpm-newcwv-06 that I was going
I've seen this setup with IPv4 before when the ISP does native IPv6. Maybe you
can get global IPv6 addresses and can SSH directly over that. If not, at least
go on record requesting IPv6 with your provider to push them along.
Tom
> On Jun 7, 2014, at 10:12 AM, None Secure via fre
when this next occurs that
would explain why or how it is wedged, so that I can either rule
myself in or out of this case?
Cheers
Tom
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send a
ical cheap Intel gigabit NICs (I forget the exact chipset,
PCI-e 1x, ~$30 USD) that do not negotiate gigabit on my cheap Linksys
switch from Windows, yet happily do so from Linux and FreeBSD, and
will always negotiate gigabit from any OS with my HP Procurve.
Cheers
Tom
__
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/31/12 3:47 AM, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:23:37AM -0400, Tom Judge wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> I am trying to get if_lagg working in an HP blade for failover
>> between the 2 in chassis cisco switches
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30/10/2012 12:51, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Oct 30, 2012, at 9:45 AM, Tom Judge wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 30/10/2012 12:12, Adam McDougall wrote:
>>> On 10/30/12 11:23,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30/10/2012 12:12, Adam McDougall wrote:
> On 10/30/12 11:23, Tom Judge wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>>
>>
>> I am trying to get if_lagg working in an HP blade for failover
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I am trying to get if_lagg working in an HP blade for failover between
the 2 in chassis cisco switches, but it would seem that the link state
is not being propagated up to the lagg device.
Any hints/ideas?
dmesg:
bxe1: metric 0
mtu 1500
options=
ure of freebsd-update to check the
status of world - "freebsd-update IDS"
I'm not sure of the best way of restoring a particular release, but
you could always download {base,doc,games,kernel,ports,src}.txz from
9.0 release and install them o
2011/8/22 Sergey Kandaurov :
> On 8 August 2011 22:06, Tom Vijlbrief wrote:
>> 2011/8/7 Sergey Kandaurov :
>>> On 7 August 2011 17:11, Tom Vijlbrief wrote:
>>>> I installed BETA1 in a fresh ubuntu 11.04 KVM virtual machine with the
>>>> new installe
2011/8/7 Sergey Kandaurov :
> On 7 August 2011 17:11, Tom Vijlbrief wrote:
>> I installed BETA1 in a fresh ubuntu 11.04 KVM virtual machine with the
>> new installer.
>>
>> Major issue I noticed was the missing /home.
>>
>> It took me quite some time to
Thanks, Kip, good to know.
I partly understand what you said, especially the last sentence, which I
rather like.
As a next step I should ask the TCP cognoscenti if this kind of tuning is
as wise as I imagine.
Tom
On 5/28/11 9:09 AM, "K. Macy" wrote:
>Unfortunately msl is a gl
ernet.
So can net.inet.tcp.msl be set per interface?
(*) Or similar: Sphinx, memcached, perhaps.
Tom
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freeb
On 19/02/2011 11:07, kevin wrote:
>> No, you have to specify stp there. The default STP mode is RSTP.
>> If you don't specify stp, you'll get a dumb ethernet bridge.
> Thanks very much for clarification. This helps me immensely. My room for
> testing is limited so this will help me take the right s
e
memory area get fragmented and the system can't allocate any new 9k
clusters.
>
> So... any feedback is good right now.
>
I will provide more feedback in the coming weeks as we load these (4)
systems up. Currently they are idling waiting for the application jails
to be deployed on th
ng kern.ipc.nmbjumbo9 and kern.ipc.nmbclusters
up to suite its needs?
2) Should this be documented in igb(4)?
Tom
--
TJU13-ARIN
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail
s a pity, because I wanted one in there.
> (Oh well, I guss I can append it from my /etc/rc.local file.)
>
Like what options? Most things can be controlled from dhclient.conf.
Cheers
Tom
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.free
n try to make the underlying problem go away?
>
Take a look at the following page:
http://www.tomjudge.com/index.php/FreeBSD/CARP_vs_VRRP
It contains a patch to change the CARP protocol ID to something that is
not used so these messages go away.
Tom
___
seeing a fast retransmission of the data between the
current ACK sequence number and the SACK start sequence.
Maybe you are seeing something similar?
Tom
> http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/dup_ack_collapsed.txt
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/sysctl_dup_acks.txt
>
>
> Sean
>
doesn't have an MX record' :/
>> That domain has an MX record, so it wouldn't do either. When I do a
>> dig isi.edu, I just get a single A record, so I would assume an SMTP
>> server would attempt to deliver mail there.
Cheers
Tom
__
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Ian Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Oct 2010, Tom Evans wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Ian Smith wrote:
> > > On Mon, 11 Oct 2010, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> > > > Hi!
> > > >
> > > > FreeB
it?
>
The same way as has been done since they invented the MX record type -
if no MX record exists, fallback to an A record. See RFC 5321, section
5.1.
Cheers
Tom
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 10/08/2010 08:48 AM, a.sm...@ukgrid.net wrote:
> Quoting Tom Judge :
>
>>
>> The R610 has a NetXtream II chipset which uses the bce(4) driver. If
>> you are going to doing heavy network traffic, or using jumbo frames I
>> would personally recommend you fit an
ow,
>
The R610 has a NetXtream II chipset which uses the bce(4) driver. If
you are going to doing heavy network traffic, or using jumbo frames I
would personally recommend you fit an Intel PCIe card to this server
before you put it in production.
Tom
--
TJU13-ARIN
On 09/23/2010 02:33 PM, Tom Judge wrote:
> The throttle command I am using in the tests is the one from here:
>
> http://klicman.org/throttle/
>
>
> On 09/23/2010 02:26 PM, Tom Judge wrote:
>
>> On 09/23/2010 01:21 PM, David Christensen wrote:
>>
>>
smaller) frames.
All of our systems running bce(4) NIC's with jumbo's have header
splitting turned on to reduce/remove issues with jumbo allocation. We
first noticed this issue in 6.2 and have had use header splitting with
all our bce(4) hardware since then.
Tom
--
TJU13-ARIN
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Hi,
I was looking though the brgphy code toady looking for a way to control
flow control from the host rather than from the switch but didn't find
any hints.
Is it possible to control the flow control negotiation on these PHY's?
Thanks
Tom
--
The throttle command I am using in the tests is the one from here:
http://klicman.org/throttle/
On 09/23/2010 02:26 PM, Tom Judge wrote:
> On 09/23/2010 01:21 PM, David Christensen wrote:
>
>>>>> Under testing I have yet to see a memory fra
On 09/23/2010 01:39 PM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:05:33AM -0500, Tom Judge wrote:
>
>> On 09/13/2010 03:53 PM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 03:38:41PM -0500, Tom Judge wrote:
>>>
>>>
> My next question is, is it possible to increase the size of the RX ring
>> without switching to RSS?
>>
>>
> I have a change I've been working on to allow RX/TX ring size
> to be adjusted through a sysctl. Let me pretty it up a bit and
> send it to you for test. You should be able to adjust the ring
> size without enabling RSS.
>
>
If you can provide a patch I have hardware available to test on.
Thanks
Tom
--
TJU13-ARIN
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Hi,
Would it be possible to unhide the output of bce_print_adapter_info()
from under boot verbose?
This information is useful for comparing firmware and card versions
between machines.
Alternatively what about adding a sysctl under dev.bce.X for this info?
Thanks
Tom
--
TJU13-ARIN
On 09/13/2010 03:53 PM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 03:38:41PM -0500, Tom Judge wrote:
>
>> On 09/13/2010 02:33 PM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 02:07:58PM -0500, Tom Judge wrote:
>>>
>>>
>
ther ip_input() or
ip_foarward() and ecmp_error() does not send the message as M_DECRYPTED
is set.
I have missed/glossed over a few steps here I feel, but in general I
think from my 15 minutes reading the code this is how it works (or at
least
gth
> 1256
> 17:59:03.105844 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 253, id 818, offset 1256, flags [none],
> proto ICMP (1), length 25)
> 192.168.225.1 > 192.168.160.248: icmp
> 17:59:03.115617 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 253, id 819, offset 0, flags [+], proto ICMP
> (1), length 1276)
> 192.168.225.1 > 192.168.160.248: ICMP echo request, id 163, seq 4, length
> 1256
> 17:59:03.115707 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 253, id 819, offset 1256, flags [none],
> proto ICMP (1), length 25)
> 192.168.225.1 > 192.168.160.248: icmp
>
> e.g. destination reachable, fragmentation work, routes symmetrical.
>
> any comments ?
>
>
>
Good Luck
Tom
--
TJU13-ARIN
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 09/13/2010 02:33 PM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 02:07:58PM -0500, Tom Judge wrote:
>
>> On 09/13/2010 01:48 PM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:04:25AM -0500, Tom Judge wrote:
>>>
>>>
On 09/13/2010 02:11 PM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> On 13.09.2010 20:48, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:04:25AM -0500, Tom Judge wrote:
>>> Without BCE_JUMBO_HDRSPLIT then we see no errors. With it we see
>>> number
>>> of errors, however th
On 09/13/2010 01:48 PM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:04:25AM -0500, Tom Judge wrote:
>
>>
>> Does this mean that these cards are going to perform badly? This is was
>> what I gathered from the previous thread.
>>
>>
> I mean t
On 09/09/2010 07:24 PM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 03:58:30PM -0500, Tom Judge wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I am just following up on the thread from March (I think) about this issue.
>>
>> We are seeing this issue on a number of systems running 7.1.
ldap server sending
large group search results back to nss_ldap or pam_ldap. When it does
this it seems to send each of the 600 results in its own TCP segment
creating a small packet storm (600*~100byte PDU's) at the destination
host. The kernel then retransmits 2 blocks of 100 results each after
The following reply was made to PR kern/149786; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Tom Uffner
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, t...@uffner.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/149786: [bwn] bwn on Dell Inspiron 1150: connections stall
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 22:56:07 -0400
after a bit more testing, i seem
The following reply was made to PR kern/149786; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Tom Uffner
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, t...@uffner.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/149786: [bwn] bwn on Dell Inspiron 1150: connections stall
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 19:32:59 -0400
no stalled connections so far
On Aug 11, 2010, at 3:11 PM, Zeus V Panchenko wrote:
> Pyun YongHyeon (pyu...@gmail.com) [10.08.11 19:31] wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 03:50:14PM +0300, Zeus V Panchenko wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> can enybody help with the subj, please?
>>>
>>> problem: onboard interface re0 link state UP/
ct that I have had some success with on FreeBSD.
http://openlldp.sourceforge.net/
Tom
--
TJU13-ARIN
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
me posts in freebsd-net where they have mentioned about
> "SIOCGIFAFLAG_IN6 ioctl"
> which gives the flags value where the TENTATIVE flag value can be plooed.
> I tried to use the same API in my user program but failed.
>
> Can somebody post me the working sample code of SIOCGIFAFLA
unning your patch in production for some time now and all seems well.
Thanks
Tom
- --
TJU13-ARIN
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJLTgd3AAoJEMSwVS7lr0Od0GkH/2sk3BGbMbOrpRtwj90Fe
You are correct. I added the route and it works fine.
route add -inet6 2610:28:1800:4001::/64 -iface em0
Thanks,
Tom
On Dec 15, 2009, at 5:00 PM, Li, Qing wrote:
> Thanks for sending me the routing table output.
>
> Actually I believe both your problems are indeed related to the
I didn't think this routing patch was related to the "bad neighbor solicitation
messages" as suggested in the subject field but I tried it anyway. It does not
fix my IPv6 problem. I still get "bad neighbor solicitation messages" and
freebsd 8 doesn't respond to 4/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kurt Buff wrote:
> Sigh. Yes, that works.
>
> So, to expose even more of my ignorance, any thoughts on why it isn't
> up at boot?
>
/etc/rc.conf:
ifconfig_em0="UP"
> Kurt
>
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:35, Jack Vogel wrote:
>> Not familiar wi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 02:43:46PM +0000, Tom Judge wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We have had some issues with running both carp and VRRP i
t the administrator
can select a different protocol number at boot/runtime if desired.
Tom
- --
TJU13-ARIN
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJLH7eiAAoJEMSwVS7lr0OdLWMH/2akcs8bMsdBlHHb+0K
# ifconfig bridge0 create
> # ifconfig
> ...
tun is a IP interface, you can not bridge to it, you can bridge to a
ethernet compatible device such as tap or gif.
Tom
> tun0: flags=8010 metric 0 mtu 1500
> bridge0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu
> 1500
>ether 5e:e7:af:1b:14:d3
>
next week on vacation.
Hi David,
This patch seems to do the trick, on at least one of the R610's that we
have.
Just did cold boot, 5 warm boots, cold boot, 5 warm boots and have not
had any issues.
Thanks
Tom
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org ma
Josh Paetzel wrote:
On Nov 21, 2009, at 11:39 AM, Tom Judge wrote:
Hi,
I was why I get the following error when trying to create a vlan on top of
if_bridge:
# ifconfig bridge0 create
# ifconfig vlan2 vlan 2 vlandev bridge0
ifconfig: SIOCSETVLAN: Protocol not supported
And if there was/is
Hi,
I was why I get the following error when trying to create a vlan on top
of if_bridge:
# ifconfig bridge0 create
# ifconfig vlan2 vlan 2 vlandev bridge0
ifconfig: SIOCSETVLAN: Protocol not supported
And if there was/is any reason for this to not be supported.
Thanks
Tom
8-RC2
as well as 7.1 with the 7.2 driver plus the split header patch).
For the record we also have not been able to reproduce the issue on the
R710 only the R610.
Tom
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/f
1 - 100 of 255 matches
Mail list logo
