Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 05:31:08PM +0400, Roman Kurakin wrote:
So, could you draw you connections and related firewall rules. And the
one you
are trying to setup. I will also try to update the machine to the most
recent 7 to
see if my setup will stop working
Hi,
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 03:38:02PM +0200, Max Laier wrote:
I might be wrong, but I don't think we ever supported rdr without
net.inet.ip.forwarding enabled. Maybe to a different local address, but even
then you'd need net.inet.ip.check_interface=0. Looking a
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
...or am I missing something?
I've a box running:
FreeBSD whiplash.wheel.pl 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Wed Jul 23 11:41:31
CEST 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/WHIPLASH i386
I'm also running PF in there with the following rule:
rdr on fxp0 proto
M. Warner Losh wrote:
I've been shepherding this patch in my p4 tree for a long time. It
removes the obsolete support for other systems in if_spppsubr.c. Is
there a reason I shouldn't commit this?
It was there to ease the keeping code in sync with other systems.
Please ask Joerg Wunsch befo
Max Laier wrote:
On Sunday 24 August 2008 01:18:37 Roman Kurakin wrote:
Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 02:03:50AM +0400, Roman Kurakin wrote:
...
unless the tools you have in mind already include ip_fw.h (in which
case the change is harmless and I have no objection
Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 02:03:50AM +0400, Roman Kurakin wrote:
...
unless the tools you have in mind already include ip_fw.h (in which case
the change is harmless and I have no objection), i think it would be better
to export the value in a sysctl and let the tools fetch
Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 01:14:45AM +0400, Roman Kurakin wrote:
Hi,
The IPFW_DEFAULT_RULE is also the max allowed rule number.
This value should be definitely public, so here is the patch, if there is
no objections I'll commit it within a couple of days.
After that, I
Hi,
The IPFW_DEFAULT_RULE is also the max allowed rule number.
This value should be definitely public, so here is the patch, if there is
no objections I'll commit it within a couple of days.
After that, I plan to fix a couple of tools that need to know this value.
Best regards,
rik
Index: ip_f
Hi,
The IPFW_DEFAULT_RULE is also the max allowed rule number.
This value should be definitely public, so here is the patch, if there is
no objections I'll commit it within a couple of days.
After that, I plan to fix a couple of tools that need to know this value.
Best regards,
rik
Index: ip
Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
Good day.
Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 08:17:09AM +0300, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
You're right, thanks for spotting the error. The corrected patch
is attached.
After some iterations with rik@ we came to a next version of an
if_bridge.4 patch. Comments are welcome.
I
Yar Tikhiy wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 05:38:11PM +0300, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
Yar,
2. In the case where 802.3ad trunking is implemented, the same Ethernet
address may be used by multiple physical interfaces.
3. As Eygene explained well: there are a number of consumers of
Ethe
Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
[...]
We're not checking if the interface member is a VLAN interface. We just
do the generic checks for the incoming interface. rik@ will send the
patch today, at least he just promised me ;))
Here it is. I'll check it for compilation this evening and I hope Eygene
wil
Andrew Thompson wrote:
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 08:22:16PM +0300, Roman Kurakin wrote:
Ok, since no one want to provide an explanation I'll to do it myself.
...
I suggest to fix this problem in the other way, by checking if the
physical interface
is the dst interface by MAC.
es and compares the MAC addresses to the
packet's one. Once match is found the interface in the packet header
will be rewritten to the found list entry's one. Apparently such
code flow will select the last added interface from the 'vlan group'
because FreeBSD list macros are addi
Hi,
I'll split this thread on to two.
Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
Good day!
I've made two PRs (and pathes for them) that are related to the networking
subsystem.
URL: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=94408
Name: kern/94408: if_bridge breaks proxy ARP functionality
Description:
P
Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
Good day!
I've made two PRs (and pathes for them) that are related to the networking
subsystem.
URL: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=94408
Name: kern/94408: if_bridge breaks proxy ARP functionality
Description:
Proxy ARP entries will not be correctly proc
Hi,
I am trying to run rat but I do not see a gui interface from it.
Time to time I get messages like "faild to bind, does multicust
configured". I didn't use this software before and I just do not
know how it should work.
Any ideas, I just do not know where the problem.
PS. I am trying to co
Hi,
freebsduser (sent by Nabble.com):
Hello List,
I am facing problem in using sppp.
Both local system amd remote systems are using the sppp.
My questions are
1.Can we use sppp as PPP server?
2.If answer to first question is yes ,how can I do that?
I tried out the following commands.
$ifc
Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 02:27:11PM -0600, David Vos wrote:
D> The version of ng_split.c packaged with 5.4 Release has a bug in it
D> that causes items to get lost (not freed) if there are no nodes
D> connected on the other end.
D>
D> This has been fixed in the CVS, Revision
n0g0013:
could anybody enlighten me as to the purpose of the "opt_netgraph.h"
dependancy in a netgraph module?
got some errors, added it to SRCS and it gets generated as an empty
file. think there is a minimal one in "sr" driver but can't guess
it's intent.
Defines NETGRAPH
rik
___
It seems reasonable. If no one take care of it, let me know
I'll commit it.
rik
David Vos wrote:
I have been playing with the netgraph ng_split node. I discovered
that if I sent packets to it, after a period of time, I could no
longer use netgraph. If I tried to use ngctl, I got an error bac
Ed Maste wrote:
On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 10:18:19AM -0700, Sam Leffler wrote:
spl's lock execution threads. 5.x and later systems mostly lock data
structures using mtx's (there are a very few exceptions). Thus there
isn't necessarily a direct replacement, you usually need to rethink your
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2005-07-12 16:38, Roman Kurakin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I am starting to investigate some net problem and I wonder if this
problem seen/known.
The problem was observed with ce(4) (Cronyx Tau32-PCI/Lite,
it is not in the tree yet, but similar t
Hi,
I am starting to investigate some net problem and I wonder if this
problem seen/known.
The problem was observed with ce(4) (Cronyx Tau32-PCI/Lite,
it is not in the tree yet, but similar to cp(4)/ctau(4) devices) and
sppp(4).
If you run usual ping you will see normal delay which is much
ming fu:
Hi,
With splnet() became a no-op in sys/systm.h
static __inline intrmask_tsplnet(void){ return 0; }
What should I use to replace the splnet?
I have a module receiving input from both ip_input() and a device that
userland can write to. I guess I was cover from the ip_
John Mok:
Yes, the framing is IETF.
== RFC1490
Maren S. Leizaola wrote:
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, John Mok wrote:
Dear Julian,
I have re-compiled the kernel with NETGRAPH_ETHER and
NETGRAPH_IFACE. I failed to create the lmi node :-
#ngctl mkpeer sync_ar0: frame_relay rawdata downstream
#ngctl name sy
Hi,
John Mok:
Dear Julian,
I have re-compiled the kernel with NETGRAPH_ETHER and NETGRAPH_IFACE.
I failed to create the lmi node :-
#ngctl mkpeer sync_ar0: frame_relay rawdata downstream
#ngctl name sync_ar0:rawdata fr-mux
#ngctl mkpeer fr-mux: lmi dlci0 ansi
Why 'ansi'? It should be 'annexD'.
a
you will get smth like ng0
Best regards,
Roman Kurakin
ngctl: send msg: No such file or directory
I tried the testing with MCI connection disconnected. How do I set the
line speed to 1536 Kbps? I hope someone could help me how to config.
the netgraph with work with Digi
Evgeny Dolgopiat:
I wrote new failure detection algorithm based on heartbeat signal for
ng_one2many node. Features:
- automatic detection of failures;
- automatic detection of recoveries;
- detection of point of failure (see diagnostics in man page);
- configurable timing parameters of failure and
Hi,
Could we also add ability to keep state between reseting of the rules?
For, example, if I use keepstates, after flushing and setting new rules that
could be different by two lines from an old one I kick my self from that
server with out any serious reason, I didn't change anything for ssh.
I
NiY wrote:
Greetings! I have yet to find a definitive answer on this subject, so
I was hoping someone would let me know the official way to go about
this, or if it's even possible.
We have two ADSL services coming into out building. We would like to
use them both on one network, using a multi-homed
Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 02:48:48PM +0300, Roman Kurakin wrote:
R> >On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 03:13:10AM +0300, Roman Kurakin wrote:
R> >R> Patches were tested on Tau-PCI - Cisco 2500 at speed 4M
R> >R> on Dual CPU system with ping-f and uptime ~one week.
Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 03:13:10AM +0300, Roman Kurakin wrote:
R> Patches were tested on Tau-PCI - Cisco 2500 at speed 4M
R> on Dual CPU system with ping-f and uptime ~one week.
One Tau adapter or more than one?
Good question. :-)
Actually one channel of the one adap
Hi,
I am glad to announce stable version of patches for sppp, cp, ctau and cx
drivers with support of mpsafe.
SPPP:
Sppp will work in mpsafe mode only for adapters that do not have
IFF_NEEDSGIANT flag.
Also this patch contains if_spppfr.c with fr support for sppp (4).
CP/CX/CTAU:
Adapters will work
Waldemar Kornewald wrote:
Roman Kurakin wrote:
Of course, I will send progress reports on this list. We at Haiku
would really appreciate working together with the FreeBSD team.
By the way, what kind of hardware you are using?
Currently, it is nothing special, just a Dual-Celeron 466 (since I
Waldemar Kornewald wrote:
George V. Neville-Neil wrote:
One other model to look at is The Click Modular Router, which is about
modularizing the routing part of the code, as opposed to the end
station code. Look at http://www.xorp.org because Click, and FreeBSD
are in there.
Thanks, this is really
Hi,
Waldemar Kornewald wrote:
Hi,
are there any plans to mularize the netstack (maybe:
protocol+interface modules)?
You mean smth like (device driver)+ng_cisco+ng_iface or what?
rik
Would it be difficult to modularize it?
I am also interested in your opinion about it:
Does it make sense to modular
Julian Elischer wrote:
Kalin Hristov wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I'd like to ask is there any plans to implement MPLS control and
forwarding plane into FreeBSD? This is extremely valuable feature :-)
I don't think there are plans yet, but if you and a few like minded
Hi,
I wonder if there is any ADSL DSLAM PCI adapter?
rik
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Andre Oppermann:
Brooks Davis wrote:
I'd like to proposed adding a new variable, ifi_epoch, to struct
if_data. It will be set to the time the counters were zeroed,
currently, the time if_attach was called. The intent is to provide a
correct value for RFC2233's ifCounterDiscontinuityTime and to
Hi,
I am near finish line in mpsafe locking work for sppp and Cronyx
adapters
drivers, so I need testers for work I've done.
Please contact me if you whish to test this code.
Best regards,
Roman Kurakin
___
[EMAIL PROT
Barney Wolff wrote:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 11:55:36AM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
I'm using the `simple' template in /etc/rc.firewall to allow LAN to access
the Internet from behind the firewall (FreeBSD-stable).
There is a rule there:
# Allow DNS queries out in the world
${fwcmd} add
Hi,
man ipfw
I think pipes is what you need.
rik
lycanthrope wrote:
hello
how to setup QoS on FreeBSD 5.2CURRENT? all I need is to split the outgoing adsl
connection to 5 users on LAN
thanks!
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/ma
Hi,
Just one more idea. We may add some sysctl option like
bridge.froce_hw_checksum.
rik
Roman Kurakin wrote:
Also:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/67823
It was send by my friend, and his server runs with this patch.
I guess that it should be idential to what you send here
Also:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/67823
It was send by my friend, and his server runs with this patch.
I guess that it should be idential to what you send here. If not
you may contact him and ask to try your one.
By the way, I thought that should be better solution. For
ex
Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
On 1 Jul 2004, at 13:48, Roman Kurakin wrote:
If this is a problem why can't you make some wrapper that will
pack/unpack written on C,
which will be a lib for you?
Because I want to minimise the size of the foreign bindings - this
would require C code for every s
Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
I'm creating Netgraph bindings for OCaml in order to play around more
easily with various Bluetooth and Ethernet things I'm working on.
It's all pretty straightforward except for the problem that the
netgraph message structs aren't all packed (e.g. struct ng_mesg).
Th
Hi,
I plan to split duties from one server to two. Currently one_server
is used
among other duties as filtering bridge between Internet and Intranet.
Internet-one_server-Intranet
I wonder, if it is possible to set two servers this way:
Internet-S1-S2-Intraner
and split duties of one using fire
Joerg Wunsch:
As Roman Kurakin wrote:
Problem:
If we have max_failure < MAXALIVECNT*5 we will
send conf-rej for magic.
Solution:
Loopback could be treated as a special case and
thus we may not count it as a failure.
Can you explain a little more, please? The patch is simple eno
Hi,
I want to propose a patch for sppp.
Problem:
If we have max_failure < MAXALIVECNT*5 we will
send conf-rej for magic.
Solution:
Loopback could be treated as a special case and
thus we may not count it as a failure.
Index: if_spppsubr.c
===
Hi,
We use SMC cards, and SMS hubs (they have a couple of normal ports).
I didn't heard about problems with pccard variant and hubs works just fine.
But pci cards works unstable.Since I do not work in that segment and I
don't have any in my PCs I can't say why we have problems with them.
rik
Jos
Yea, I think the same.
rik
Guy Harris wrote:
This commit reminded me one of my old ideas. Why not to make some
function that allow to change DLT on the fly?
Such as NetBSD's "bpf_change_type()"?
/*
* Change the data link type of a interface.
*/
void
bpf_change_type(ifp, dlt, hdrlen)
stru
AL Chane wrote:
AL Chane:
Hi, there:
I have two interfaces on my linux PC in the same network:
ifconfig eth0 172.20.1.30 netmask 255.255.255.0
ifconfig eth1 172.20.1.31 netmask 255.255.255.0
Another Windows PC with IP 172.20.1.32 netmask 255.255.255.0
I found that in the same network, L
AL Chane:
Hi, there:
I have two interfaces on my linux PC in the same network:
ifconfig eth0 172.20.1.30 netmask 255.255.255.0
ifconfig eth1 172.20.1.31 netmask 255.255.255.0
Another Windows PC with IP 172.20.1.32 netmask 255.255.255.0
I found that in the same network, Linux PC
This commit reminded me one of my old ideas. Why not to make some
function that allow to
change DLT on the fly? Sync adapters can work with various types of
protocols and protocol
can be changed on the fly. Now we have to use DLT_NULL in such case and
this strips
functionality.
rik
David Malone
Hi,
http://www.cronyx.ru/~rik/frf12_beta.tgz
This is beta version of ng_frf12 module - FRF12 Frame Relay Fragmentation.
Currently only End-to-End fragmentation supported. A bit later I'll post
version with Interface fragmentation.
Driver works as a filter between ng_frame_relay module and ng_rfc149
Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 06:31:18PM +0400, Roman Kurakin wrote:
R> >On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 05:50:21PM +0400, Roman Kurakin wrote:
R> >R> >Here is the first one - convert all ng_type initializers to C99 sparse
R> >R> >type.
R> >R> >
R
Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 05:50:21PM +0400, Roman Kurakin wrote:
R> >Here is the first one - convert all ng_type initializers to C99 sparse
R> >type.
R> >
R> Hey guys, it seems all of you forgot about device nodes :-)
Which ones? Just point me and I'
Hi,
Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
[...]
Here is the first one - convert all ng_type initializers to C99 sparse type.
Hey guys, it seems all of you forgot about device nodes :-)
rik
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fre
ead, but many of users of Cronyx adapters
prefer to use sppp (not only for fr).
Best regards,
Roman Kurakin
On Fri, 7 May 2004, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
GS> D> we're using Cronyx adapters, some of them in FremaRelay mode, which has been
GS> D> supported by
Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 04:31:08PM +0400, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
D> GS> FreeBSD has support for FR with help of nodes ng_frame_relay and ng_lmi. This
D> GS> support is hardware independent. And it works perfectly with cronyx adapters.
D> GS> What is a reason for merging hard
/www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=netgraph&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=FreeBSD+5.2-current&format=html
Best regards,
Roman Kurakin
rik
Thanks,
George
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd
Eugene Grosbein wrote:
On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 04:11:12PM +0400, Roman Kurakin wrote:
I tried to replace a cable, to reset the switch, to reboot this 4.9-STABLE
box - nothing helps. What should I try next?
Did you tried another port on a switch?
Yes, I tried several. No change. All
Eugene Grosbein wrote:
Hi!
My Intel motherboard contains on-boad NIC:
em0: port
0xac00-0xac1f mem 0xfe9e-0xfe9f irq 10 at device 1.0 on pci2
It it connected to Allied Telesyn AT FS724i unmanaged switch,
media is autodetected correctly - 100baseTX full-duplex.
It worked nice for 3 months
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 10:44:37AM +0400, Roman Kurakin wrote:
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
As an aside, I've started working on the ``[-]polling'' option for
ifconfig(8) that, when done, will allow changing the polling status
of individual interfaces i
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
As an aside, I've started working on the ``[-]polling'' option for
ifconfig(8) that, when done, will allow changing the polling status
of individual interfaces in run-time, e.g., the following command
will disable polling on nge0:
ifconfig nge0 -polling
Just a thought, wh
vent whell. This node does not
add a new PPP node, it adds only possibility of using sppp as a netgraph
node. If we can, why not to join
them together?
Best regards,
Roman Kurakin
Regards,
Vincent
On Monday 01 March 2004 18:11, Roman Kurakin wrote:
Hi,
I just release n
://users.inse.ru/~rik/ng_sppp/ng_sppp.tgz
Best regards,
Roman Kurakin
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
and I will add support for those versions.
PS.
Could some one add it to FreeBSD source tree?
Best regards,
Roman Kurakin
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send
Thanks!
Maxim Konovalov wrote:
On 18:38+0300, Feb 14, 2003, Roman Kurakin wrote:
Roman Kurakin wrote:
Fixed in rev. 1.99 src/sys/net/if_spppsubr.c, will MFC the fix before
RELENG_4. Thanks!
[...]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebs
Roman Kurakin wrote:
Hi,
splx was lost
--- if_spppsubr.c.orig Fri Jan 17 17:04:49 2003
+++ if_spppsubr.c Fri Jan 17 17:05:53 2003
@@ -973,15 +973,17 @@
splx (s);
return (EAFNOSUPPORT);
}
/*
* Queue message on interface, and start
ere since sppp_output() is only called on behalf of
Best regards,
Roman Kurakin
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Hi,
I just release new version of ng_sppp.
Have anybody try this driver?
Changes:
Fixed: It was wrong to stop sending packets if an interface is not
!running or !up.
Added: Manual page was added.
Best regards,
Roman Kurakin
ng_sppp-1.1.tgz
Description
Hi,
I just release new version of ng_sppp.
Have anybody try this driver?
Changes:
Fixed: It was wrong to stop sending packets if an interface is not
!running or !up.
Added: Manual page was added.
Best regards,
Roman Kurakin
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
tions,
please contact me.
It was checked with 5.0 DP2.
Best regards,
Roman Kurakin
ng_sppp-1.0.tgz
Description: application/compressed
Hi,
Joerg Wunsch wrote:
As Roman Kurakin wrote:
Sppp still have a quantity of bugs. Here is one of them:
--- if_spppsubr.c.origWed Oct 16 18:41:16 2002
+++ if_spppsubr.cThu Nov 21 20:13:16 2002
@@ -1672,12 +1672,12 @@
case STATE_ACK_SENT:
break;
case
ame problem: at first we should call tlf that
will changes state
and then we should set proper state. If we set some state and then call
tlf we will get wrong
final state.
Best regards,
Roman Kurakin
pch
Description: application/java-applet
Hi,
Does anybody know articles about measurement of router
characteristics, especially PC-based routers?
Best regards,
Roman Kurakin
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
s it. Thus all driver are broken as modules.
Best regards,
Roman Kurakin
Julian Elischer wrote:
>I'm sorry I have not tried it for some time (a couple of months)
>I do not know what has been broken.
>
>I will try look tomorrow.
>It only uses mutex i
also works with out any
problems, only
netgraph + witness leads to fault) Any suggestions?
Best regards,
Roman Kurakin
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Hi,
If you want sync/async cards look at:
http://www.cronyx.ru/hardware/sigma22.html
http://www.cronyx.ru/hardware/taupci.html
Best regards,
Roman Kurakin
John Hay wrote:
>>
>>is the moxa c101/isa (HD64570) supersync board supported?
>>
>
&
//www.cronyx.ru/hardware/sigma22.html
We also plan to release HSSI card in future.
Best regards,
Roman Kurakin
>
>
>regards,
>Mihail Balikov
>
>
>
>To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body
t regards,
Roman Kurakin
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Hi,
Joerg Wunsch wrote:
>As Roman Kurakin wrote:
>
>...
>
>>I don't think that they should be broken out completely. Physicaly,
>>yes it will be better to split them into separate files (core, ppp,
>>fr, cisco). From my point of view (Serge's as well )
Hi,
Joerg Wunsch wrote:
>As Roman Kurakin wrote:
>
>>This letter was sent last Saturday. When should I expect any
>>reaction?
>>
>
>You've already got one from me.
>
I thought someone else maintains this part of kernel. Was I wrong?
Best regards,
Hi,
This letter was sent last Saturday. When should I expect any reaction?
Best regards,
Kurakin Roman
Roman Kurakin wrote:
> Hi,
> This is the first patch of set of patches that I plan to make.
> These patches ware send several
> times as a b
ample) final state
"Initial".
In some cases this isn't so fatal but in other this will put out of
action a link.
All this changes was made according to RFC1661.
Best regards,
Roman Kurakin, Software Engineer,
Cronyx Engineering
>>Synopsis: Frame Relay support, cor
87 matches
Mail list logo
