On Fri, 13 Sep 2024 13:40:55 +
Mike Belanger wrote:
> Thank you for the response and for sharing your scenario.
>
> We’ve also hacked up the cgem and the ffec driver to support a shared
> mdio. That was not too difficult, but we have a new scenario where
> the mdio is now being shared betwee
On Fri, 6 Sep 2024 18:03:39 +
Mike Belanger wrote:
> The following device tree specifies a shared mdio.
> The ffec driver uses miibus.
> When there is a shared mdio, one of the device instances will not be
> able to properly configure the PHY, as it needs to use the other
> devices resource t
On Tue, 23 Aug 2022 18:06:59 +
tt78347 wrote:
> --- Original Message ---
> On Tuesday, August 23rd, 2022 at 3:58 PM, Milan Obuch
> wrote:
[ snip ]
> > > There is an additional vnet jail which handles ipsec; the ipsec
> > > jail connects the host's
On Tue, 23 Aug 2022 15:06:00 +
tt78347 wrote:
> Hello. This is my first email to this mailing list, so I hope it has
> been sent and formatted correctly.
Well, top posting is being frowned upon a bit on mailing list, which
has its racio, otherwise I think everything is fine :)
> Regarding t
On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 22:22:45 +0200
Michael Gmelin wrote:
> > On 15. Aug 2022, at 08:52, Milan Obuch wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > some time ago I managed to design and implement multi-tenant OpenVPN
> > server using vnet jails. This way I am able to use
On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 13:12:14 -0700
John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> Milan Obuch wrote this message on Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 08:53 +0200:
> > I tried to mimic this in FreeBSD with following commands:
> >
> > ifconfig gre1 create tunnel 172.16.1.1 172.16.0.1 vnet ov1
> > jexec
Hi,
some time ago I managed to design and implement multi-tenant OpenVPN
server using vnet jails. This way I am able to use more OpenVPN
instances on single public IP.
This is made possible using tun/tap interface property allowing to
cross vnet boundary - here is part of my initialisation comman
Hi,
a week ago I tried to get some hint from hackers, no response there.
(Subject: Two devices created for one block in device tree?)
I have a board with SoC containing two MACs (cgem driver) plus two
PHYs, but MDIO bus controlling both PHYs is connected to second MAC.
Thus my problem is how can
On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 17:21:41 +0200
Andreas Nilsson wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Robert Blacquiere
> > wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 04:51:53PM +0200, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I'm struggling a fair bit with gre tunnels today:
> > >
> > > Woe 1:
> > >
> >
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 11:19:31 +0100
Matthias Apitz wrote:
> El día Tuesday, January 31, 2012 a las 11:01:00AM +0100, Milan Obuch
> escribió:
>
> > > I was thinking about a Huawei USB modem monitor and got a pointer
> > > to the ports/net/e169-stats (thanks
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:44:14 +0100
Matthias Apitz wrote:
> El día Monday, January 30, 2012 a las 12:09:20PM +0100, Matthias
> Apitz escribió:
>
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm used to connect my FreeBSD laptop or netbooks to Internet using
> > Huawei USB modems (E220 or E1750) with good results, if
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 12:09:20 +0100
Matthias Apitz wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm used to connect my FreeBSD laptop or netbooks to Internet using
> Huawei USB modems (E220 or E1750) with good results, if the networks
> coverage of the provider is good enough in the place in question.
>
> While monit
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 17:36:04 +0800
"Chen, Kang (NSN - CN/Hangzhou)" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As you know, if I want to create a new vlan interface face, I can use
> the following command:
> ifconfig vlan0 vlan 101 vlandev fxp0
> My question is, if I want to change the vlan id 101 to 202, if there
> a
On Monday 31 January 2011 03:07:02 Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 05:15:10PM -0800, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 02:53:15PM +0100, Milan Obuch wrote:
> > > On Sunday 30 January 2011 07:40:48 Zeus V Panchenko wrote:
> > > &g
On Sunday 30 January 2011 07:40:48 Zeus V Panchenko wrote:
> another detail for this nic
>
> dmidecode
> Base Board Information
> Manufacturer: ASUSTeK Computer INC.
> Product Name: AT5NM10-I
> Version: Rev x.0x
> Serial Number: MT7006K15200322
>
I did not followe
On Friday 17 December 2010 07:32:49 Jayster wrote:
[ fine comments on our OS trimmed ]
> Now the issue. Without too much detail, my device has 4 GigE ports on it.
> Each will be attached to a routed network. There is NO routing required
> between networks inside the box (not a router or firewall)
se network related in csup's
output...
Thanks for quick fix.
Milan
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org on behalf of Milan Obuch
> Sent: Wed 5/13/2009 10:03 PM
> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> Subject: Weird dhclient behavior after today's rebu
Hi,
I did full system rebuild from freshly csup'ped sources. Everything went
smooth as usual, but after reboot network card did not get configured via
DHCP. There were four lines logged on console/in syslog:
dhclient[822]: re0: not found
dhclient[822]: exiting
dhclient[823]: connection closed
d
On Tuesday 04 November 2008 02:46:04 Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 11:39:06PM +0100, Milan Obuch wrote:
> > On Monday 03 November 2008 04:59:08 Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> >
> > [ snip ]
> >
> > > I vaguely guess hardware was not properly in
On Monday 03 November 2008 04:59:08 Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
[ snip ]
> I vaguely guess hardware was not properly initialized. How about
> this one?
> http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/re/re.phy.patch.20081103
This bug seems again to disappear - csup two days ago, kernel built with no
patches and
On Friday 31 October 2008 02:11:25 Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:41:01PM +0100, Milan Obuch wrote:
> > On Thursday 30 October 2008 11:26:56 Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 08:29:35AM +0100, Milan Obuch wrote:
> > > > Hi,
On Thursday 30 October 2008 11:26:56 Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 08:29:35AM +0100, Milan Obuch wrote:
> > Hi,
> > yesterday I csup'ped my 8-current sources on my MSI Wind netbook (again)
> > and tried to build new kernel. There is again a problem
Hi,
yesterday I csup'ped my 8-current sources on my MSI Wind netbook (again) and
tried to build new kernel. There is again a problem with re interface. It
just does not work, with following
re0: port 0xc000-0xc0ff mem
0xffd1-0xffd10fff,0xffd0-0xffd0 irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci1
re0
On Friday 19 September 2008 05:36:50 Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 12:32:42PM +0200, Milan Obuch wrote:
> > On Monday 08 September 2008 12:29:12 Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> > > On Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 08:03:52AM +0200, Milan Obuch wrote:
> > >
> >
On Monday 08 September 2008 12:29:12 Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 08:03:52AM +0200, Milan Obuch wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > It was my pleasure and I would like to express my thanks for your great
> > work. If you will need in future some more testing with
On Saturday 06 September 2008 17:43:43 Sam Leffler wrote:
[ snip ]
> > Hm, I downloaded install CDs for NetBSD-4.0 and OpenBSD-4.3, and they do
> > not show working wireless interface/no driver attached. How did you try
> > it? Do you have any reference, alternatively?
> >
> > Wireless interface
On Friday 05 September 2008 18:13:45 Kevin Downey wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 7:43 AM, Milan Obuch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [ snip ]
> > Could anybody comment on wireless interface?
>
> I could not get the internal wifi to work with ndis wrapper. It
> app
On Saturday 06 September 2008 02:46:27 Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
[ snip ]
> > > > When not booting verbose, there is also one line telling
> > > > re0: turning off MSI enable bit.
> > >
> > > re(4) cleared MSI enable bit of configuration register as MSI
> > > wouldn't be used. You can ignore t
On Friday 05 September 2008 16:43:51 Milan Obuch wrote:
> On Friday 05 September 2008 10:23:22 Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 09:45:08AM +0200, Milan Obuch wrote:
>
> [ snip ]
>
> > > In 7.0-RELEASE wired network interface did not work, but after
&
On Friday 05 September 2008 10:23:22 Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 09:45:08AM +0200, Milan Obuch wrote:
[ snip ]
> > In 7.0-RELEASE wired network interface did not work, but after upgrading
> > to 7-STABLE (now 7.1-PRERELEASE) it work with re driver. There i
Hi,
I have new notebook, MSI's Wind, and installed succesfully both FreeBSD-7
and -CURRENT.
In 7.0-RELEASE wired network interface did not work, but after upgrading to
7-STABLE (now 7.1-PRERELEASE) it work with re driver. There is just one small
uglyness - it's link level address (MAC) is 00:00
On Saturday 02 February 2008, Milan Obuch wrote:
> Hi,
> I am getting weird problem with network configuration.
>
> In rc.conf I have (just for demonstation, only part)
>
> ifconfig_em0="polling"
>
> cloned_interfaces="vlan2"
> ifconfig_vlan2=&q
Hi,
I am getting weird problem with network configuration.
In rc.conf I have (just for demonstation, only part)
ifconfig_em0="polling"
cloned_interfaces="vlan2"
ifconfig_vlan2="vlan 2 vlandev em0"
ifconfig_vlan2_name="em0.2"
Result is incorrect:
em0.2: flags=8003 mtu 1500
ether 00:00:0
On Monday 05 November 2007 08:59:39 Klavs Klavsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just to close this thread - I've confirmed that it was indeed a switch
> problem.
>
> The "funny" thing, is howcome only CARP triggered it.
>
Out of curiosity - could you tell me the model? I have similar trouble, not
yet confirme
On Monday 22 October 2007 07:06:30 Len Gross wrote:
> I'm trying to "monitor" an ethernet interface with a tee node, but ping
> breaks when I setup the graph. I suspect I'm doing something "dumb" with
> respect to how the Ethernet node and/or the iface (ng0) need to be
> configured in order to ma
On Friday 19 October 2007 05:08:43 Max Laier wrote:
> On Thursday 18 October 2007, Milan Obuch wrote:
> > On Thursday 18 October 2007 14:32:13 Milan Obuch wrote:
> > > On Thursday 18 October 2007 12:50:19 Max Laier wrote:
[ snip ]
> > >
> > > I am experienci
On Thursday 18 October 2007 14:32:13 Milan Obuch wrote:
> On Thursday 18 October 2007 12:50:19 Max Laier wrote:
> > On Thursday 18 October 2007, Klavs Klavsen wrote:
> > > I tried to just disable carp on the new machine (simply comment out
> > > carp config from /etc
On Thursday 18 October 2007 12:50:19 Max Laier wrote:
> On Thursday 18 October 2007, Klavs Klavsen wrote:
> > I tried to just disable carp on the new machine (simply comment out
> > carp config from /etc/rc.conf.local) and now the packet loss is gone -
> > and hasn't been there for half an hour, so
On Sunday 22 July 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello.
>
...
>
> At the moment I'm trying to get that working with netgraph's ngeth
> interfaces. But they seem to behave in some really weird way.
> Details:
> # ifconfig ngeth0 10.42.42.1 netmask 255.255.255.250
Netmask 255.255.255.250 looks wei
On Saturday 23 June 2007, Julian Elischer wrote:
> Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
> > Julian Elischer wrote:
> >> In the future I am hoping to be able to use vimage in our products.
> >> They are based at the moment on 6.1, but I can see in a year they will
> >> be based on 7.x.
> >>
> >> Patches for 7.0
On Saturday 21 October 2006 17:28, Robert Watson wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Oct 2006, Milan Obuch wrote:
> > I know this is really minimum information here, but I need just an idea
> > what to look for. It is strange for me - is it some memory leak? How
> > could it be cleared wi
Hi,
I am seeing something strange on couple of our routers. All are WRAP based on
6.1-RELEASE-p6, easiest description is:
# ping
PING : 56 data bytes
ping: sendto: No buffer space available
ping: sendto: No buffer space available
^C
--- ping statistics ---
2 packets transmitted, 0 packets recei
On Wednesday 10 May 2006 03:49, Edward B. DREGER wrote:
> MO> Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 14:39:25 +0200
> MO> From: Milan Obuch
>
> MO> > JE> how do you want to select which table should be used?
> MO> > Ingress interface.
> MO>
> MO> Sounds reasonabl
On Wednesday 10 May 2006 01:16, Julian Elischer wrote:
> Ray Mihm wrote:
> > Using ipfw tables is essentially a non-starter, IMHO. How would
> > routing protocols use ipfw based tables, for example? Marko's work
> > touches a lot of files, but I don't think it's heavy weight.
> >
> > I also think u
On Tuesday 09 May 2006 22:25, Ray Mihm wrote:
> Can't you just incorporate Marko's work at
> http://www.tel.fer.hr/zec/BSD/vimage/index.html? The design looks
> pretty clean too. And, XORP which probably is multiple tables aware,
> would make FreeBSD a really kick-ass routing platform.
>
Unfortuna
On Tuesday 09 May 2006 08:00, Edward B. DREGER wrote:
> JE> Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 21:54:18 -0700
> JE> From: Julian Elischer
>
> JE> how do you want to select which table should be used?
>
> Ingress interface.
>
Sounds reasonable, one important point missing - packets locally
originated/'destina
On Tuesday 09 May 2006 06:54, Julian Elischer wrote:
> Pramod Srinivasan wrote:
> >Hi Folks,
> >
> >I am curious to know if there is any plans to support multiple routing
> >tables in FreeBSD's official release?
> >
> >There was some discussion on this topic last year, if there is any vrf
> >patch
On Tuesday 21 March 2006 10:22, Ragnar Lonn wrote:
> Julian Elischer wrote:
> > I'm looking at a problem where I want onemachine to really look like 2.
> > this means I want to have 2 separate routing tables if possible.
> >
> > I know I could do it with eas if I could user Marco Zec's vimage patch
On Thursday 01 September 2005 11:45, Digital Brain wrote:
> >You sure the ISP doesn't use PPPeE?
>
> The modem acts as a bridge. All I have to do is turn it on; it then
> synchronizes with the ISP's network (PPPoA). Then I just execute dhcpcd
> eth0 from the linux machine (connected to the modem) a
On Tuesday 09 August 2005 11:04, Marko Zec wrote:
> On Monday 08 August 2005 18:47, Andre Oppermann wrote:
...
> Andre,
>
> there's no doubt almost any idea or particularly software can be
> improved. Could you provide a more elaborate argumentation to your
> claim the network stack cloning conc
On Monday 08 August 2005 17:57, Marko Zec wrote:
> On Monday 08 August 2005 12:32, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> > Dave+Seddon wrote:
> > > BTW, I'd be interested to know people's thoughts on multiple IP
> > > stacks on FreeBSD. It would be really cool to be able to give a
> > > jail it's own IP stack
On Tuesday 28 June 2005 14:09, Max Laier wrote:
...
> > > > > pf does something along these lines in case you are looking for
> > > > > references.
> > > >
> > > > Would it be possible to share this tag among pf and ipfw ?
> > >
> > > Sure, it's a simple mbuf tag with a (at this point) 16bit cookie
On Tuesday 28 June 2005 12:37, Max Laier wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 June 2005 12:27, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> > > Wouldn't a more general approach be better. e.g. a way to "tag" a
> > > packet before it is sent to divert and a matching tag-lookup that can
> > > do further action. This would make it ve
On Tuesday 28 June 2005 12:27, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> > Wouldn't a more general approach be better. e.g. a way to "tag" a packet
> > before it is sent to divert and a matching tag-lookup that can do further
> > action. This would make it very easy to do all kinds of stuff that needs
> > to know
On Tuesday 28 June 2005 09:46, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> Hi Julian,
>
> > The challenge:
> >
> > figure out a way so that all teh users on the network behind fxp0
> > hcan use the internet using the T1 attached to the cisco off fxp1
> > while all the advertised services (about 8 of them, few enough t
On Monday 13 June 2005 13:46, Ragnar Lonn wrote:
> Julian Elischer wrote:
> > Ragnar Lonn wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I've been using vimage on FreeBSD 4.11 along with Netgraph to setup a
> >> system
> >> that simulates many physical client machines for the purpose of
> >> testing broadband
> >> I
On Wednesday 20 April 2005 09:35, Julian Elischer wrote:
> Milan Obuch wrote:
> > On Wednesday 20 April 2005 09:02, Julian Elischer wrote:
> >>Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >>>If you are more interested in "road warrior type configurations" rather
> >>
On Wednesday 20 April 2005 09:02, Julian Elischer wrote:
> Andriy Gapon wrote:
> > If you are more interested in "road warrior type configurations" rather
> > than site-to-site (judging from your refrence to special cisco vpn
> > clients), please take a look at security/vpnc and google:ipsec-tools
I just noticed some problem with my mail server.
Please ignore.
Milan
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Hi,
I am evaluating ath driver with Senao AR5212 chip based miniPCI card.
Motherboard used is Geode based WRAP. While it works well in modes 11b and
11g, performance in 11a mode I need is suboptimal, as said in man page - even
worse. However, test with newer driver, albeit with linux system, wor
On Wednesday 21 April 2004 08:58, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 09:53:37AM +0300, Petri Helenius wrote:
> ...
>
> > Relevant quote from the RFC:
>
> a very appropriate one indeed, which seems to substantiate my point.
>
> >interfaces that might be added dynamically. The exact me
On Tuesday 20 April 2004 19:15, Mónica Domingues wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I need help to install a usb web cam in FreeBSD 4.9.
>I'am using a Creative camera.
>I already put in file /etc/rc.conf
> usbd_enable="YES"
>
> Thank's for the attention,
> Mónica Domingues
>
Look
62 matches
Mail list logo
