On Tuesday 28 June 2005 09:46, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: > Hi Julian, > > > The challenge: > > > > figure out a way so that all teh users on the network behind fxp0 > > hcan use the internet using the T1 attached to the cisco off fxp1 > > while all the advertised services (about 8 of them, few enough to > > list by hand in rules etc.) which are also behind fxp0 but acccessed by > > NAT'd addresses from the addresses on fxp1's net are accessed soly via > > that T1. > > > > [...] > > > > I can get the 'forward' direction easily.. i.e. incoming packets. > > > > It's the reverse direction that doesn't work for me. > > I considerred running 2 NATDs > > but I need to run ipfw to identify teh reverse streams to force back via > > fxp2 > > and the only way I can do that is by using the 'fwd' command. > > if I do that I can't divert them and if I divert them to natd first, I > > can't 'fwd' them afterwards as the NATing is already done for the other > > (wrong) interface. > > You definitely want a non-terminal "fwd" command. > Ari Suutari has just implemented the "setnexthop" action that does the > trick, I think the patch [1] is waiting to be commited in -CURRENT. > I don't think this would be really difficult to backport to RELENG_4. >
I think this is good solution for him. At least once I needed to solve something similar, no luck then... > Hope this helps. > Regards, > > [1] http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2005-June/007710.html > > PS: I'm seeing more and more requests about routing limitations in > FreeBSD everyday, such as lack of multiple routing tables support, lack > of source routing (as well as higher level protocol based routing). > Are there actually some projects that are being worked on to overcome > this ? I used Marko Zec's virtualization patch for multiple VPN management and monitoring and it worked great. It does exist for 4-RELEASE, however. I am not ready to do anything like this yet, but if someone would work on sothing similar for newer releases, I would be really willing to try it out and test. I need to solve some multiple VPN problem again and using legacy release is the only option, but something newer would be really better. Regards, Milan _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
