not the IPs from 116 to 120.
Erich
On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 21:50:47 +0800
Erich Dollansky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a very weird problem with my testing LAN. Only FreeBSD machines
> are on the network. It all works as expected until I give the address
> 192.168.0.121 to a client machin
Hi,
I have a very weird problem with my testing LAN. Only FreeBSD machines
are on the network. It all works as expected until I give the address
192.168.0.121 to a client machine. This machine is not able to mount
remote file systems via NFS despite this IP address is specifically
mentioned in /et
cases are nice in
> running numbers,
>
> but when the cases are messy, it will by just like lots of if/else
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 6:30 AM, Erich Dollansky <
> erichsfreebsdl...@alogt.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 22:39:34 +08
firmware as YAMAMOTO Shigeru suggested.
Erich
On Sun, 5 Oct 2014 11:38:47
-0500 Scot Hetzel wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 7:34 AM, Erich Dollansky
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sat, 4 Oct 2014 21:32:47 -0400
> > Glen Barber wrote:
> >
> >> -BE
Hi,
On Sun, 5 Oct 2014 11:38:47 -0500
Scot Hetzel wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 7:34 AM, Erich Dollansky
> wrote:
> > On Sat, 4 Oct 2014 21:32:47 -0400
> > Glen Barber wrote:
> >
> >> The first RC build of the 10.1-RELEASE release cycle is now
> >>
Hi,
On Sat, 4 Oct 2014 21:32:47 -0400
Glen Barber wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> The first RC build of the 10.1-RELEASE release cycle is now available
I installed this shortly after your e-mail came. The result was the
same as with BETA3. If you remember, I have
Hi,
On Sat, 7 Jun 2014 09:48:39 -0700 (PDT)
None Secure via freebsd-net wrote:
> Yes, but in this case BOTH IPs of the gateway - both the external and
> the internal interfaces - are non-routable IPs, and so is my ISP
> cable modem.
>
> 192.168.1.1 is the cable modem
> 192.168.1.2 is external i
Hi,
On Fri, 6 Jun 2014 23:22:46 -0700 (PDT)
None Secure via freebsd-net wrote:
> BUT, what if my ISP is giving me a private IP, and my internal
> network is also private IPs ? External gateway address is
> 192.168.1.2 and internal gateway address is 10.10.10.1 ... the ONLY
> way I could make th
yesterday even with
iwn failing.
Good work!
Erich
> Hi,
>
> Please try wifi without the lagg config.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> -adrian
>
> On 7 July 2013 17:56, Erich Dollansky
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > after upgrading to:
> >
> > 10.0-CURREN
working. I will do some research on this first.
I am back now to the old kernel.
Erich
On Sun, 7 Jul 2013 18:19:13 -0700
Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please try wifi without the lagg config.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> -adrian
>
> On 7 July 2013 17:56, Er
Hi,
On Sun, 7 Jul 2013 21:32:17 -0400
Jason Hellenthal wrote:
> Was thinking that same thing. Agg before the adapter is actually
> ready.
it worked before.
>
> Simple test might be to bring up the wifi links in the rc and wait
> till a point where rc.local can be used to setup the aggregation
via it to the
Internet.
I am just compiling the latest release. Please give me time to report
the new results.
Erich
> Thanks,
>
>
> -adrian
>
> On 7 July 2013 17:56, Erich Dollansky
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > after upgrading to:
> >
> > 10.0
Hi,
after upgrading to:
10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #2 r252491M:
Wed Jul 3 08:45:23 CIT 2013
I have got the problem that lagg hangs the machine on start-up.
What I found out was that iwn associates to the access point but stops
then. Lagg seems to wait then foreever. Turning off wireless
Hi,
On Wed, 9 Jan 2013 16:25:41 -0800
Michael Sierchio wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Erich Dollansky
> wrote:
>
> > SMP goes into the applications. A single-CPU kernel must still run
> > these kind of applications.
>
> Applications may be multithreade
Hi,
On Wed, 9 Jan 2013 06:35:33 -0800 (PST)
Barney Cordoba wrote:
>
> This explanation defies the possibility of a GENERIC kernel, which
> of course is an important element of a GPOS. Its too bad that smp
> support can't be done with logic rather than a kernel option.
>
it seems to me that y
Hi,
On Wed, 9 Jan 2013 05:40:13 -0800 (PST)
Barney Cordoba wrote:
> --- On Wed, 1/9/13, Erich Dollansky
> wrote:
> > From: Erich Dollansky
> > Subject: Re: To SMP or not to SMP
> > To: "Mark Atkinson"
> > Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> > Da
Hi,
On Tue, 08 Jan 2013 08:29:51 -0800
Mark Atkinson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 01/07/2013 18:25, Barney Cordoba wrote:
> > I have a situation where I have to run 9.1 on an old single core
> > box. Does anyone have a handle on whether it's better to build a
Hi,
On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 18:25:58 -0800 (PST)
Barney Cordoba wrote:
> I have a situation where I have to run 9.1 on an old single core box.
> Does anyone have a handle on whether it's better to build a non SMP
> kernel or to just use a standard SMP build with just the one core?
> Thanks.
I ran a
Hi,
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 07:57:05 -0400
Dominic Blais wrote:
> Hi (sorry, I clicked send too fast ;) ),
oh yeah, the fast index finger.
>
> replace the gateway. I often see, but not only, Microsoft owned IP as
> my default gateway when it happens.
do you have traffic to these addresses too? Wh
Hi,
I am again on a very remote location with a pretty slow Internet
connection. The problem I would like to solve sounds simple.
What is the easiest way to shape the network traffic so that one
machine gets most of the bandwidth when needed while all other machines
share the remaining bandwidth?
Hi,
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 20:06:22 -0700
"Rudy (bulk)" wrote:
> Checking all the interfaces, there are a lot more drops/Ierrs on
> em2... The igb devices (PCIe card) seem a lot better than the
> Supermicro motherboard em devices. Is this an on-board vs mb thing,
> or em vs igb thing?
>
I do not
Hi,
I recently bought a Zyxel NWD210N.
It works perfect since the developer fixed what I reported to be faulty.
It is a wireless USB device.
Erich
On Tuesday 28 February 2012 11:39:33 Mikhail T. wrote:
> Hello!
>
> The on-motherboard Ethernet "card" in one of my computers stopped
> working s
Hi,
On Sunday 27 November 2011 22:13:42 LinuxIsOne wrote:
>
> Well, I am basically a Windows convert, but very frankly saying that: I am
> new to the world of Linux. So I should use FreeBSD or something easier
as you know already, BSD is not Linux. BSD is part of the original Unix
development a
Hi,
On Tuesday 15 March 2011 11:27:44 Ryan Coleman wrote:
> I've searched high and low and have no idea where to start to get this thing
> going... It's recognizing it now but I am not finding any details online
> (like people who have shared their full configuration details) on how they
> got
Hi,
On Monday 14 March 2011 14:28:55 Maciej Milewski wrote:
>
> Monday 14 of March 2011 01:38:21 Ryan Coleman napisał(a):
> It is recognized as cd device (it's called a feature in windows world - it
> has
> a drivers for the modem to autoinstall it). Ejecting this cd should detach
> umass and
Hi,
Paul Haddad wrote:
I've got the below system setup that has so far been very stable when
running with 2GB of RAM. I've recently been attempting to upgrade it to 4GB
of ram (using 4 DIMMs vs the current 2). The problem is that within a few
hours of running with the 4GB config I start gettin
Hi,
Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote:
I want to say that I'm don't know if 8000 irq per second means a high
IRQ use or a lower user.
I must say, that I did not do hardware since some time. But 10 000
Interrupts per second is not this high. Modern CPUs should be able to
handle much much more.
S
Hi,
I have had the same behaviour.
LI Xin wrote:
Recently one of our local user has found that he was unable to use
hosts(5) to override "localhost" lookup that happens in DNS, while doing
rpc_clnt_create. A preliminary investigate of this seems to be related
to nsdispatch, by replacing:
hos
Hi,
Wesley Griffin wrote:
but I get the following output:
-
Current value 0x0013 will change to 0x0010
Retrying eeprom write!
Retrying eeprom write!
[snip lots of this message]
EEPROM write failed
this sounds like a simple hardware error.
Or does your device have a write protection?
In
Hi,
Harti Brandt wrote:
On Tue, 23 May 2006, Mark Jayson Alvarez wrote:
As somebody else said, that's a hardware thing. In any case there is an
Austrian city (don't remember the name) where the provider is forced to
put this down, because they cannot meet the requirements for off-band
emissi
Hi,
Mark Jayson Alvarez wrote:
Hi,
A while ago, a group of individuals have demonstrated
us with devices that can be used to extend your
yes, it works wonderful.
But there is a huge but.
It works wonderful as long as the data volume is low.
The problem is that the powerlines are not shield
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At this moment, I'm getting more than 50% interrupts and 20% packets lost.
you must have something very basic done the wrong way.
I would suggest to upgrade that box to 6.1.
You need then a systematic approach.
Run the GENERIC kernel and see what happens there.
Hi,
Bring Joy wrote:
Hi!
After upgrading 5.3-p14 to 5.4 by changing the RELENG
in make.conf, make buildworld goes well, but make
buildkernel stops with the message:
1) "make: don't know how to make
../../../dev/aac/aac_ioctl.h. Stop" (for GENERIC)
Where did you get the sources from?
I have ha
Hi,
Palle Girgensohn wrote:
--On onsdag, mars 17, 2004 00.21.44 +0100 "Arno J. Klaassen"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I have an ASUS motherboard A7V8X-E Deluxe with onboard 10/100/1000
Mbit/s NIC from Marvell Semiconductor.
My problem is that it sometimes lock up with the error message
34 matches
Mail list logo