Re: what is the secret behind 192.168.0.121

2015-12-16 Thread Erich Dollansky
not the IPs from 116 to 120. Erich On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 21:50:47 +0800 Erich Dollansky wrote: > Hi, > > I have a very weird problem with my testing LAN. Only FreeBSD machines > are on the network. It all works as expected until I give the address > 192.168.0.121 to a client machin

what is the secret behind 192.168.0.121

2015-12-16 Thread Erich Dollansky
Hi, I have a very weird problem with my testing LAN. Only FreeBSD machines are on the network. It all works as expected until I give the address 192.168.0.121 to a client machine. This machine is not able to mount remote file systems via NFS despite this IP address is specifically mentioned in /et

Re: performance of the swtich/case statements

2014-10-30 Thread Erich Dollansky
cases are nice in > running numbers, > > but when the cases are messy, it will by just like lots of if/else > > > On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 6:30 AM, Erich Dollansky < > erichsfreebsdl...@alogt.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 22:39:34 +08

Re: FreeBSD 10.1-RC1 Now Available --- lagg disables network inside jails

2014-10-07 Thread Erich Dollansky
firmware as YAMAMOTO Shigeru suggested. Erich On Sun, 5 Oct 2014 11:38:47 -0500 Scot Hetzel wrote: > On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 7:34 AM, Erich Dollansky > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Sat, 4 Oct 2014 21:32:47 -0400 > > Glen Barber wrote: > > > >> -BE

Re: FreeBSD 10.1-RC1 Now Available --- lagg disables network inside jails

2014-10-05 Thread Erich Dollansky
Hi, On Sun, 5 Oct 2014 11:38:47 -0500 Scot Hetzel wrote: > On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 7:34 AM, Erich Dollansky > wrote: > > On Sat, 4 Oct 2014 21:32:47 -0400 > > Glen Barber wrote: > > > >> The first RC build of the 10.1-RELEASE release cycle is now > >>

Re: FreeBSD 10.1-RC1 Now Available --- lagg disables network inside jails

2014-10-05 Thread Erich Dollansky
Hi, On Sat, 4 Oct 2014 21:32:47 -0400 Glen Barber wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > The first RC build of the 10.1-RELEASE release cycle is now available I installed this shortly after your e-mail came. The result was the same as with BETA3. If you remember, I have

Re: Can you create a FreeBSD gateway, with private IPs, without NAT/divert ?

2014-06-07 Thread Erich Dollansky
Hi, On Sat, 7 Jun 2014 09:48:39 -0700 (PDT) None Secure via freebsd-net wrote: > Yes, but in this case BOTH IPs of the gateway - both the external and > the internal interfaces - are non-routable IPs, and so is my ISP > cable modem. > > 192.168.1.1 is the cable modem > 192.168.1.2 is external i

Re: Can you create a FreeBSD gateway, with private IPs, without NAT/divert ?

2014-06-06 Thread Erich Dollansky
Hi, On Fri, 6 Jun 2014 23:22:46 -0700 (PDT) None Secure via freebsd-net wrote: > BUT, what if my ISP is giving me a private IP, and my internal > network is also private IPs ?  External gateway address is > 192.168.1.2 and internal gateway address is 10.10.10.1 ... the ONLY > way I could make th

Re: Lagg hangs machine at boot time

2013-07-08 Thread Erich Dollansky
yesterday even with iwn failing. Good work! Erich > Hi, > > Please try wifi without the lagg config. > > Thanks, > > > -adrian > > On 7 July 2013 17:56, Erich Dollansky > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > after upgrading to: > > > > 10.0-CURREN

Re: Lagg hangs machine at boot time

2013-07-08 Thread Erich Dollansky
working. I will do some research on this first. I am back now to the old kernel. Erich On Sun, 7 Jul 2013 18:19:13 -0700 Adrian Chadd wrote: > Hi, > > Please try wifi without the lagg config. > > Thanks, > > > -adrian > > On 7 July 2013 17:56, Er

Re: Lagg hangs machine at boot time

2013-07-07 Thread Erich Dollansky
Hi, On Sun, 7 Jul 2013 21:32:17 -0400 Jason Hellenthal wrote: > Was thinking that same thing. Agg before the adapter is actually > ready. it worked before. > > Simple test might be to bring up the wifi links in the rc and wait > till a point where rc.local can be used to setup the aggregation

Re: Lagg hangs machine at boot time

2013-07-07 Thread Erich Dollansky
via it to the Internet. I am just compiling the latest release. Please give me time to report the new results. Erich > Thanks, > > > -adrian > > On 7 July 2013 17:56, Erich Dollansky > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > after upgrading to: > > > > 10.0

Lagg hangs machine at boot time

2013-07-07 Thread Erich Dollansky
Hi, after upgrading to: 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #2 r252491M: Wed Jul 3 08:45:23 CIT 2013 I have got the problem that lagg hangs the machine on start-up. What I found out was that iwn associates to the access point but stops then. Lagg seems to wait then foreever. Turning off wireless

Re: To SMP or not to SMP

2013-01-09 Thread Erich Dollansky
Hi, On Wed, 9 Jan 2013 16:25:41 -0800 Michael Sierchio wrote: > On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Erich Dollansky > wrote: > > > SMP goes into the applications. A single-CPU kernel must still run > > these kind of applications. > > Applications may be multithreade

Re: To SMP or not to SMP

2013-01-09 Thread Erich Dollansky
Hi, On Wed, 9 Jan 2013 06:35:33 -0800 (PST) Barney Cordoba wrote: > > This explanation defies the possibility of a GENERIC kernel, which > of course is an important element of a GPOS. Its too bad that smp > support can't be done with logic rather than a kernel option. > it seems to me that y

Re: To SMP or not to SMP

2013-01-09 Thread Erich Dollansky
Hi, On Wed, 9 Jan 2013 05:40:13 -0800 (PST) Barney Cordoba wrote: > --- On Wed, 1/9/13, Erich Dollansky > wrote: > > From: Erich Dollansky > > Subject: Re: To SMP or not to SMP > > To: "Mark Atkinson" > > Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org > > Da

Re: To SMP or not to SMP

2013-01-08 Thread Erich Dollansky
Hi, On Tue, 08 Jan 2013 08:29:51 -0800 Mark Atkinson wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 01/07/2013 18:25, Barney Cordoba wrote: > > I have a situation where I have to run 9.1 on an old single core > > box. Does anyone have a handle on whether it's better to build a

Re: To SMP or not to SMP

2013-01-07 Thread Erich Dollansky
Hi, On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 18:25:58 -0800 (PST) Barney Cordoba wrote: > I have a situation where I have to run 9.1 on an old single core box. > Does anyone have a handle on whether it's better to build a non SMP > kernel or to just use a standard SMP build with just the one core? > Thanks. I ran a

Re: Default route "random" gateway modification bug

2012-10-10 Thread Erich Dollansky
Hi, On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 07:57:05 -0400 Dominic Blais wrote: > Hi (sorry, I clicked send too fast ;) ), oh yeah, the fast index finger. > > replace the gateway. I often see, but not only, Microsoft owned IP as > my default gateway when it happens. do you have traffic to these addresses too? Wh

shape network traffic but give priority to one application

2012-10-09 Thread Erich Dollansky
Hi, I am again on a very remote location with a pretty slow Internet connection. The problem I would like to solve sounds simple. What is the easiest way to shape the network traffic so that one machine gets most of the bandwidth when needed while all other machines share the remaining bandwidth?

Re: ping: sendto: No buffer space available

2012-09-24 Thread Erich Dollansky
Hi, On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 20:06:22 -0700 "Rudy (bulk)" wrote: > Checking all the interfaces, there are a lot more drops/Ierrs on > em2... The igb devices (PCIe card) seem a lot better than the > Supermicro motherboard em devices. Is this an on-board vs mb thing, > or em vs igb thing? > I do not

Re: Seeking recommendation on good USB network card

2012-02-28 Thread Erich Dollansky
Hi, I recently bought a Zyxel NWD210N. It works perfect since the developer fixed what I reported to be faulty. It is a wireless USB device. Erich On Tuesday 28 February 2012 11:39:33 Mikhail T. wrote: > Hello! > > The on-motherboard Ethernet "card" in one of my computers stopped > working s

Re: choosing distribution: FreeBSD

2011-11-27 Thread Erich Dollansky
Hi, On Sunday 27 November 2011 22:13:42 LinuxIsOne wrote: > > Well, I am basically a Windows convert, but very frankly saying that: I am > new to the world of Linux. So I should use FreeBSD or something easier as you know already, BSD is not Linux. BSD is part of the original Unix development a

Re: Setting up Novatel Mifi 2200 on 8.2-REL

2011-03-14 Thread Erich Dollansky
Hi, On Tuesday 15 March 2011 11:27:44 Ryan Coleman wrote: > I've searched high and low and have no idea where to start to get this thing > going... It's recognizing it now but I am not finding any details online > (like people who have shared their full configuration details) on how they > got

Re: Setting up Novatel Mifi 2200 on 8.2-REL

2011-03-14 Thread Erich Dollansky
Hi, On Monday 14 March 2011 14:28:55 Maciej Milewski wrote: > > Monday 14 of March 2011 01:38:21 Ryan Coleman napisał(a): > It is recognized as cd device (it's called a feature in windows world - it > has > a drivers for the modem to autoinstall it). Ejecting this cd should detach > umass and

Re: Network Instability when upgrading to 4GB of RAM

2008-04-19 Thread Erich Dollansky
Hi, Paul Haddad wrote: I've got the below system setup that has so far been very stable when running with 2GB of RAM. I've recently been attempting to upgrade it to 4GB of ram (using 4 DIMMs vs the current 2). The problem is that within a few hours of running with the 4GB config I start gettin

Re: Maximum NIC interrupts

2007-12-26 Thread Erich Dollansky
Hi, Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote: I want to say that I'm don't know if 8000 irq per second means a high IRQ use or a lower user. I must say, that I did not do hardware since some time. But 10 000 Interrupts per second is not this high. Modern CPUs should be able to handle much much more. S

Re: [nsdispatch] hosts(5) does not override DNS lookup?

2007-09-12 Thread Erich Dollansky
Hi, I have had the same behaviour. LI Xin wrote: Recently one of our local user has found that he was unable to use hosts(5) to override "localhost" lookup that happens in DNS, while doing rpc_clnt_create. A preliminary investigate of this seems to be related to nsdispatch, by replacing: hos

Re: Country Code woes with D-Link DWL-AG530

2007-09-06 Thread Erich Dollansky
Hi, Wesley Griffin wrote: but I get the following output: - Current value 0x0013 will change to 0x0010 Retrying eeprom write! Retrying eeprom write! [snip lots of this message] EEPROM write failed this sounds like a simple hardware error. Or does your device have a write protection? In

Re: Anyone heard about Broadband over power lines???

2006-05-24 Thread Erich Dollansky
Hi, Harti Brandt wrote: On Tue, 23 May 2006, Mark Jayson Alvarez wrote: As somebody else said, that's a hardware thing. In any case there is an Austrian city (don't remember the name) where the provider is forced to put this down, because they cannot meet the requirements for off-band emissi

Re: Anyone heard about Broadband over power lines???

2006-05-23 Thread Erich Dollansky
Hi, Mark Jayson Alvarez wrote: Hi, A while ago, a group of individuals have demonstrated us with devices that can be used to extend your yes, it works wonderful. But there is a huge but. It works wonderful as long as the data volume is low. The problem is that the powerlines are not shield

Re: Packet loss with traffic shaper and routing

2006-04-26 Thread Erich Dollansky
Hi, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At this moment, I'm getting more than 50% interrupts and 20% packets lost. you must have something very basic done the wrong way. I would suggest to upgrade that box to 6.1. You need then a systematic approach. Run the GENERIC kernel and see what happens there.

Re: 5.4 upgrade kernel failure (aac_ioctl.h/opt_carp.h)

2005-05-19 Thread Erich Dollansky
Hi, Bring Joy wrote: Hi! After upgrading 5.3-p14 to 5.4 by changing the RELENG in make.conf, make buildworld goes well, but make buildkernel stops with the message: 1) "make: don't know how to make ../../../dev/aac/aac_ioctl.h. Stop" (for GENERIC) Where did you get the sources from? I have ha

Re: sk ethernet driver: watchdog timeout

2004-04-07 Thread Erich Dollansky
Hi, Palle Girgensohn wrote: --On onsdag, mars 17, 2004 00.21.44 +0100 "Arno J. Klaassen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, I have an ASUS motherboard A7V8X-E Deluxe with onboard 10/100/1000 Mbit/s NIC from Marvell Semiconductor. My problem is that it sometimes lock up with the error message