Hi, On Wed, 9 Jan 2013 06:35:33 -0800 (PST) Barney Cordoba <barney_cord...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > This explanation defies the possibility of a GENERIC kernel, which > of course is an important element of a GPOS. Its too bad that smp > support can't be done with logic rather than a kernel option. > it seems to me that you have a very simply view on what SMP means for software. > The big thing I see is the use of legacy interrupts vs msix. Its not > like flipping off SMP support only changes the scheduler behavior. SMP goes into the applications. A single-CPU kernel must still run these kind of applications. Erich _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
