Prior to FreeBSD 12, I removed most ATM support, but left NgATM and
ng_atmllc. The time is to remove them is almost certainly past. I aim
to commit deprecation notices shortly and follow up with removal after a
week or so. If you find they are useful (in production) on systems
without support fo
I'd like to propose that we remove the ndis(4) driver prior to FreeBSD
13. It was a clever idea in the early 2000's when the market was
flooded with 10/100 NICs with Windows-only drivers, but that hasn't been
the case for ages and the driver has had no meaningful maintenance in
ages[0]. I'd be a
On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 07:32:37PM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On 2020-04-07 19:26, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> >
> > In message <20200407172151.gb72...@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net>, Brooks
> > Davis writes:
> >
> >> My question for t
In r331797 I added a public accessor for the ifru_data member of
struct ifreq (using a union to access the right version of the struct
depending on the caller's ABI and creating a pointer from the 32-bit
version's integer representation). I've also recently exposed versions
for ifru_buffer. All n
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 06:41:36AM +0800, Ben Woods wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Oct 2019 at 1:45 am, Brooks Davis wrote:
>
> > DHCP is one of the most exposed attack surfaces in existence. We expect
> > it to take input from explicitly untrustworthy networks and perform
> > ac
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 08:32:59AM +0800, Ben Woods wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 at 8:53 am, Ben Woods wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 16 May 2019 at 2:25 am, Hiroki Sato wrote:
> >
> >> wrote
> >> in <001e01d50b49$176104d0$46230e70$@gmail.com>:
> >>
> >> dr> Has anyone ever thought or considered integra
I've posted a review to remove obsolete 10 and 10/100 Ethernet drivers
as previous approved in FCP-101. The following drivers are slated for
removal from FreeBSD-HEAD (to be FreeBSD-13):
ae, bm, cs, de, ed, ep, ex, fe, pcn, sf, sn, tl, tx, txp, vx, wb, xe
Since the previous announcement dme(4) h
On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 04:00:50AM -0800, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 11:43:44PM +, Brooks Davis wrote:
> > > We are currently planning to remove the following less-popular 10/100
> > > Ethernet drivers in the March/April timeframe:
> > &g
We are currently planning to remove the following less-popular 10/100
Ethernet drivers in the March/April timeframe:
ae, bm, cs, de, dme, ed, ep, ex, fe, pcn, sf, sn, tl, tx, txp, vx, wb, xe
All of these drivers generate warnings in FreeBSD 12 and to the best of
my knowledge, none have cleared th
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 06:54:01AM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 05:19:33AM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > > And I have read case law that boiled down to the presents vs absence
> > > of a comma
> >
> > If we are now going to evaluate all proposed changes to FreeBS
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 04:26:45PM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 5:07 PM Rodney W. Grimes <
> > freebsd-...@pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net> wrote:
> >
> > > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 11:33:35PM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> > > > > > I'd also suggest that rl stands in stark
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 04:06:48PM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 11:33:35PM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> > > > I'd also suggest that rl stands in stark contrast to the cs, wb, sn,
> > > > smc,
> > > > sf, tl, tx and vr drivers, which nobody has mentioned in this th
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 11:33:35PM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> > I'd also suggest that rl stands in stark contrast to the cs, wb, sn, smc,
> > sf, tl, tx and vr drivers, which nobody has mentioned in this thread, and
> > which I doubt are in use in any FreeBSD system of any age today.
>
> vr
On Sun, Oct 07, 2018 at 11:25:48AM +0200, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
> On 10/4/18 3:07 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> > At the root of this problem is the community's long resistance to having
> > data reported back to the project data about the machines running FreeBSD.
> > Absent any real and significa
On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 04:18:22PM +0100, Jamie Landeg-Jones wrote:
> Remember, it's not simply deprecating cards less than 1Gig.
>
> I have a card that is 10/100 only, but works fine with the gigabit alc driver:
>
> alc0: port 0x2000-0x207f mem
> 0xe050-0xe053 irq 16 at device 0.0 on p
On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 11:21:03AM -0500, Kevin Day wrote:
>
>
> > On Oct 4, 2018, at 7:58 AM, Warner Losh wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 6:53 AM Luciano Mannucci
> > wrote:
> >
> >>> While I have no objection for general direction, I have doubts about
> >> removal
> >>> of ste(4) and
s a person who has edited every driver in the tree multiple times
in the last year (mostly in an external tree), I will consider this
process successful even if we keep the majority of listed drivers in the
tree.
On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 09:05:16PM +, Brooks Davis wrote:
> >>> Pl
list.
The full FCP-0101 is included below.
-- Brooks
---
authors: Brooks Davis
state: feedback
---
# FCP 101: Deprecation and removal of 10/100 Ethernet drivers
Deprecate most 10 and 10/100Mbps Ethernet drivers and remove them before
FreeBSD 13.
## Problem Statement
Each network driver create
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 09:16:23AM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 04:56:32PM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > > > I have posted a revision which removes support for token-ring networking
> > > > from the tree. There have been no such devices for some time.
> > > >
>
On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 04:56:32PM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > I have posted a revision which removes support for token-ring networking
> > from the tree. There have been no such devices for some time.
> >
> > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D14875
> >
>
> Arcnet coming soon?
> and probably
I have posted a revision which removes support for token-ring networking
from the tree. There have been no such devices for some time.
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D14875
-- Brooks
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 01:09:27PM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > The nxge(4) driver for the Neterion Xframe-I and Xframe-II 10GbE
> > adapters has obvious bugs (by inspection) and it doesn't appear the
> > company exists any more. We'd like to see if there are any significant
> > users of thi
The nxge(4) driver for the Neterion Xframe-I and Xframe-II 10GbE
adapters has obvious bugs (by inspection) and it doesn't appear the
company exists any more. We'd like to see if there are any significant
users of this device and plan to remove it from FreeBSD-12 if not.
-- Brooks
signature.asc
On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 12:47:51AM +0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 28/4/17 2:00 am, Brooks Davis wrote:
> > As previous threatened, I've removed support for NATM (as well as a
> > remarkable number of remnants of the old ATM framework). One piece
> > that still rema
As previous threatened, I've removed support for NATM (as well as a
remarkable number of remnants of the old ATM framework). One piece
that still remains is the ngatm framework in netgraph. This includes
the ng_ccatm(4), ng_sscfu(4), ng_sscop(4), and ng_uni(4) nodes.
These don't attach to physic
; >> not support newer variants of ProSUM cards). I also have clients that
> >> still use ATM and prosum cards and FreeBSD. My guess is that
> >>
> >> they're not the only ones. Just my 5cents. The other thing is that
> >> ATM/NATM infrastructure in Fre
As previously threatened, I plan to remove NATM support next week. This
includes the drivers en(4), fatm(4), hatm(4), and patm(4). None of
these devices have been manufactured in the last 20 years so it is time
to move on.
The planned commit can be seen at https://reviews.freebsd.org/D9883
-- B
ge-
> From: owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org] On
> Behalf Of Brooks Davis
> Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2017 2:33 AM
> To: freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org; freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> Subject: Calling ATM NIC users: en(4), fatm(4), hatm(4), patm(4)
>
>
Our current ATM stack supports a small number of NICs that were
current in the late 90s[0]. None of them have been manufactured in a
long time and while you can buy hatm(4) devices on e-bay, it's
increasingly difficult to find a motherboard that will accept them.
I'd like to propose removing supp
On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 10:37:48PM +, Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 11:29:31AM +, Matt Churchyard via freebsd-net
> wrote:
> > From the little information I can find on the net it seems that valeX:Y is
> > the format for a port on a vale switch.
>
On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 11:29:31AM +, Matt Churchyard via freebsd-net wrote:
> From the little information I can find on the net it seems that valeX:Y is
> the format for a port on a vale switch.
> Some examples use vale0:1, others use a letter such as valeA:0. The only
> details I can find i
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 10:26:18AM -0700, Xin Li wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 05/28/15 10:21, Patrick Kelsey wrote:
> > Yes, I'll give it a go. I haven't yet done a dry-run to see how
> > hairy it might be, so no predictions there.
>
> Great! Please feel fre
On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 08:13:56PM -0700, Yuri wrote:
> I am observing what dhclient sends to the server. Source IP of the
> packet it sends is the previous DHCP lease. This address doesn't exist
> any more, because I manually deleted it with 'ifconfig em0 remove '
> command. Yet, when I rerun d
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 08:41:23AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> [ Adding Brooks, IIRC, he imported the current dhclient ]
>
> On Friday, July 13, 2012 5:48:30 am Peter Jeremy wrote:
> > On 2012-Jul-12 13:41:39 -0700, Yuri wrote:
> > >I have the simplest possible DHCP setup: ifconfig_re0="DHCP" in
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 08:49:55PM -0400, Eric W. Bates wrote:
> On 3/15/2012 7:27 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > 2012/3/14 Eugene Grosbein:
> >> 15.03.2012 06:33, hiren panchasara ?:
> >>
> >>> network_interfaces is basically historic rudiment
> >>> used in 2.2.x FreeBSD version and al
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 08:16:22PM -0800, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> All,
>
> Juniper is in the final phases of creating a clean separation
> between FreeBSD and Junos, so as to make upgrades of FreeBSD
> easier. This also allows Juniper to track -current and be more
> active FreeBSD contributors.
vfs.nfsrv.nfs_privport controls wither or not NFS enforces the
traditional RPC semantics that require that requests come from
"privileged" ports. By default this check is disabled. Hardening
guides typically suggest this be enabled, usually via the rc.conf knob
nfs_reserved_port_only=YES.
I'm tr
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 12:17:27PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 03, 2010 10:29:11 am John Baldwin wrote:
> > Currently vlan(4) interfaces have an interface type of IFT_ETHER instead of
> > IFT_L2VLAN in the sockaddr_dl that is returned by getifaddrs(3). If you do
> > a
> > ro
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 01:08:15AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> Foremost, sorry for the cross-post, but more eyes in this case means
> overall more discussion. Secondly, please keep me CC'd as I'm not on
> either -rc or -net.
>
> I recently proposed addition of a new script to the rc framework
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 11:17:27AM +0200, Artis Caune wrote:
> 2009/10/29 Brooks Davis :
> >> btw, wouldn't it be nice not to bother with loader.conf when using
> >> . syntax?
> >> This patch will load if_vlan automatically in this case:
> >
> > Sor
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 12:31:49AM +0200, Artis Caune wrote:
> 2009/10/28 Brooks Davis :
> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 03:18:41PM +0100, Sebastian Hyrwall wrote:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> Now that FreeBSD has support for writing ??, cloned_interfaces="em0.100"
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 03:18:41PM +0100, Sebastian Hyrwall wrote:
> Hi
>
> Now that FreeBSD has support for writing , cloned_interfaces="em0.100"
> instead of having to create for example a vlan0 and then specify vlandev
> etc in ifconfig. What is the correct ifconfig-line in rc.conf for this?
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 10:49:24AM -0700, Li, Qing wrote:
> >
> > My point has always been - if I have to add/do an ioctl I can always
> > also use a library call that will read it from a .txt, .xml, .db file
> > or whatever and I don't have to go to the kernel, handle all the
> > string length pr
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 08:06:25PM +1000, Ian Smith wrote:
> On Sun, 24 May 2009, Rui Paulo wrote:
> > Hi,
> > If anyone is interested in testing out wireless mesh networking under
> > FreeBSD, the project has now reached a point where you can transfer
> > packets between mesh nodes.
>
> Alway
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 01:33:06PM -0400, David Horn wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Oliver Fromme
> wrote:
> > David Horn wrote:
> > ?> Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > ?> >
> > ?> > ?network_interfaces="bge0 lo0"
> > ?>
> > ?> Ah. ?Ok, now I am understanding your scenario.
> > ?>
> > ?> I th
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 08:07:35PM +0200, Yony Yossef wrote:
> > Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
> > > ...
> > > I wanted to stress only one point: simple 'kldunload ' and
> > > 'kldload ' makes devices to flip for Yony's case.
> > This means
> > > that unless some PCI hotplug stuff is here (which I don't
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 05:33:17PM -0500, Jordy Dickinson wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Brooks Davis wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 03:04:55PM +, Rui Paulo wrote:
> > >
> > > On 19 Dec 2008, at 14:19, Jordy Dickinson wrote:
> > >
>
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 03:04:55PM +, Rui Paulo wrote:
>
> On 19 Dec 2008, at 14:19, Jordy Dickinson wrote:
>
>> Hey, I've never used a mailing list before, so forgive me if I'm not doing
>> this right.
>>
>> I'm trying to set up my network card, but I keep getting this error
>> message.
>>
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 12:27:58AM -0800, Jonathan Feally wrote:
> Sorry for the cross-post, but this could be either lists problem.
>
> I have 2 boxes running 7-STABLE as of 20081130, both i386 SMP. One is
> running ISC DHCPD 3.0.x from recent ports, and the other dhclient from make
> world.
>
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 03:13:00PM +0200, Popof Popof wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a FreeBSD 6.0 box andi need to configure it in a way that I must use
> 2 vlans under one interface and both of them will get an address thanks to
> dhclient.
>
> So in order to make this job I created vlans:
>
> ifconfig
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 07:16:24AM +, Jens Rehsack wrote:
> Brooks Davis wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 10:36:34PM +, Jens Rehsack wrote:
>>> Brooks Davis wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 09:30:39PM +0000, Jens Rehsack wrote:
>&g
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 10:36:34PM +, Jens Rehsack wrote:
> Brooks Davis wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 09:30:39PM +, Jens Rehsack wrote:
>>> Brooks Davis wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> maybe this question is better asked in
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 09:30:39PM +, Jens Rehsack wrote:
> Brooks Davis wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> maybe this question is better asked in this list ...
>>>
>>> I was searching why ports/net/p5-Net-Interface was not working as
>>> expe
> Hi,
>
> maybe this question is better asked in this list ...
>
> I was searching why ports/net/p5-Net-Interface was not working as
> expected and found some reasons. Most of them I can answer by implementing
> some test code as attached, but now I'm wondering why em0 is shown twice
> and lo0 is
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 04:30:36PM -0400, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 4:24 PM, Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > do you have the ability to test this?
>
> Absolutely. Is this the only thing from preventing it being merged into
> HEAD?
No. It's a large and compl
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 09:22:32PM -0400, Steve Bertrand wrote:
> Steve Bertrand wrote:
>> Brooks Davis wrote:
>
>>> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 08:27:47PM -0400, Steve Bertrand wrote:
>>>>> Is there any way to create, and assign addresses to a if_vlan
>>&g
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 08:27:47PM -0400, Steve Bertrand wrote:
>> Is there any way to create, and assign addresses to a if_vlan
>> sub-interface (eg: em6.3) via rc.conf at boot?
>
> Sorry for the noise...
>
> cloned_interfaces="em6.3"
> ifconfig_em6.3="inet x.x.x.x netmask x.x.x.x"
>
> ...seem
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 01:02:07PM +0200, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Brooks Davis wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 06:30:05PM -0700, Peter Losher wrote:
>>> Randy Bush wrote:
>>>> this has been a cause of great pain for a lng time.
>>>>
>>>
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 06:30:05PM -0700, Peter Losher wrote:
> Randy Bush wrote:
>> this has been a cause of great pain for a lng time.
>>
>>http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh/
>>
>> as openssh seems not to be fixing it (and i do not consider a 2mb fixed
>> buffer to be fixed
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 02:01:21PM -0400, Niki Denev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've noticed that autoloading of if_vlan.ko on vlan creation does not
> work in the case when the vlans are specified with the interface name.
> i.e. : fxp0.5 And the problem is that ifmaybeload() in ifconfig.c
> expects that al
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:38:31AM -0700, vijay singh wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message
> From: Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Brooks Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: vijay singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> Sent: Sunday,
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 06:35:23PM -0700, vijay singh wrote:
> Hi all. How do we avoid a race in populating the ifindex_table? Id
> this is a TODO, as it seems from the code below, would it be
> acceptable if I wrote a patch and reused the ifnet_lock [IFNET_WLOCK,
> IFNET_WUNLOCK]?
Locking if_inde
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 03:05:31PM +0200, Guido van Rooij wrote:
> What is the best way to be able to have a FreeBSD system connect
> via 802.1x to a wired network? Wap_supplicant seems to insist on
> calling 80211 ioctl's and thus fails.
>
> I found the open1x project, but did not find it in the
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 02:23:20PM +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was using following command in FreeBSD 6.2:
>
> # ifconfig lo1 create inet 172.16.16.2 netmask 255.255.255.0
>
> In FreeBSD 7.0 I got an error:
>
> # ifconfig lo1 create inet 172.16.16.2 netmask 255.255.255.0
> ifconf
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 01:24:13PM +0200, Yehonatan Yossef wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm porting a 10GigE driver to FreeBSD 6.3. My card has 2 ports.
> Loading the driver brings up two new interfaces, problem is they have
> the same name.
>
> How do I configure the interface numbering?
Generating the
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 11:13:14AM +1300, Andrew Thompson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 12:38:06PM -0700, Sean Chittenden wrote:
> >> interface ethernet 1/g1
> >> switchport mode trunk
> >> switchport trunk allowed vlan add 10
> >> exit
> >
> > I think this is an issue with default VLAN membersh
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 06:51:58PM +1100, Robert Jenssen wrote:
> Hi Brooks and all,
>
> On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 12:06:26 pm you wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 11:37:21AM +1100, Robert Jenssen wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > Every so often I have trouble connecting rt2560 based PCI wireless
> > > network
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 01:23:57PM +1100, Robert Jenssen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the prompt reply. By "owned", I meant that "ps -ajx"
> shows /sbin/devd as the process group leader. For example, at the moment on
> my system:
>
> [root etc]ps -axj | grep devd
> root5727 1 5727
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 11:37:21AM +1100, Robert Jenssen wrote:
> Hi,
> Every so often I have trouble connecting rt2560 based PCI wireless network
> card to my wireless router/access point. Typically I get:
>
> # sudo /etc/rc.d/netif restart ral0
> Starting wpa_supplicant.
> ral0: no link ...
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 10:58:33AM -0500, Yousif Hassan wrote:
> Thank you to all who responded.
>
> The suggestion was made to use devd or ifstated. Both sound like
> excellent tools, but I'm currently being tripped up by a core problem -
> both tools rely on the kernel to notify userland of lin
On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 04:50:22PM -0500, Yousif Hassan wrote:
> Net-gurus:
>
> I hope this is the right list to write to regarding this question (feel
> free to redirect me to ports@ if that sounds more appropriate).
>
> I'm looking for a facility to automatically detect network interface
> carr
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 01:09:13PM +, Robert Watson wrote:
>
> I'd like for us to create a wiki page tracking these various projects, and
> pointing at per-project resources. Once the discussion has settled a bit,
> I can take responsibility for creating such a page, but will need everyone
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 08:08:35AM -0800, Randy Bush wrote:
> it is alleged that rh0 is processed in 6.2 (<
> http://www.6journal.org/archive/0284/01/IPv6_RH_security-csw07.pdf>).
> is this true. is rh0 processed in 7 and -current?
6.2-RELEASE with no patches does process rh0 like basicly e
On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 04:34:59PM +0100, Roman Divacky wrote:
> hi
>
> I implemented SIOCGIFINDEX in linuxulator and I would like you
> to review the patch.. the implementation is trivial, just mapping
> it to the native fbsd call.
>
> the patch can be found here: http://www.vlakno.cz/~rdivacky/
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 09:53:56AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> It's possible using ipfw to mostly implement this, and with an upcoming
> change, possible to completely implement this.
>
> the "uid" function of ipfw can act as a "does there exist a socket to which
> this packet would go?" tes
On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 04:21:23AM +0100, Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
> Matus Harvan wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was wondering if I could get some feedback about the patch and
> > whether others think it could be committed.
> >
>
> The UDP catchall patch as submitted here clashes with the blackhole
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 11:54:27AM +1200, Andrew Thompson wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I have been digging into why the edsc module wasnt being loaded by
> ifconfig and now have a patch.
>
> A few printfs showed the problem.
>
> # ifconfig edsc0 create
> ifmaybeload(edsc0)
> trying to find if_edsc or eds
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 03:51:25PM -0500, Sean C. Farley wrote:
> I currently have a setup on a laptop where I have two aliases that I
> always want present. I would like to setup two aliases in
> /etc/dhclient.conf to handle having the Ethernet cable plugged in after
> boot, but dhclient has
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 06:46:44PM +0300, Mike Makonnen wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 06:14:23PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
> > > - You can now do things like:
> > > # Start/Stop IPv6 on all interfaces
> > > /etc/rc.d/netif (start|stop) ip6
> > >
I keep forgetting to do a review so a few comments now and hopefully a
fuller review later.
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 09:29:06PM +0300, Mike Makonnen wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> Ever since rc.d was brought into the tree we all agreed IPv6 needed
> to be integrated better. Well, I've finally gotten ar
On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 06:37:59PM +0100, Hartmut Brandt wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Mar 2007, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>
> EG>On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 11:30:44AM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> EG>
> EG>> Harti Brandt wrote:
> EG>> >Nice feature, although it would be nice to align the maximum length
> with
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 01:20:23PM +0300, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Quite a while ago I noticed that our ioctl handlers get the ioctl
> command via u_long, but ether_ioctl()'s command argument is int.
> This disarray dates back to 1998, when ioctl functions started to
> take u_long as the
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 09:46:36PM +0100, Rink Springer wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 09:39:38PM +0100, Ed Schouten wrote:
> > I just compiled and installed a kernel with the new nfe(4) driver and
> > DEVICE_POLLING enabled. Below are the results of some scp(1) transfers:
>
> scp(1) isn't reall
On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 12:43:29PM -0300, Fabr?cio Barros Cabral wrote:
> Hello everybody!
>
> I'm developing a network application which needs *to intercept* a packet
> (not just *copy* a packet, like libpcap does), move this packet into my
> application (userland), do some checking in the packet
On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 02:46:30AM +, MQ wrote:
> 2006/11/3, Brooks Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 09:46:47AM +, MQ wrote:
> >> 2006/11/2, Brooks Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> >
> >> >O
Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >Hello "MQ",
> >
> >your email client is seriously mis-configured, could you please look into
> >this as it is a bit annoying.
> >
> >On Friday 03 November 2006 10:46, MQ wrote:
> >> 2006/11/2, Brooks D
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 09:46:47AM +, MQ wrote:
> 2006/11/2, Brooks Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 08:26:27AM +, . wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I am confused by the use of inet_ntoa function in the kernel.
>
On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 08:26:27AM +, . wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am confused by the use of inet_ntoa function in the kernel.
>
> The function inet_ntoa in the /sys/libkern/inet_ntoa.c uses a static array
> static char buf[4 * sizeof "123"];
> to store the result. And it returns the address of the a
On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 09:16:07AM +0200, Harti Brandt wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Oct 2006, Joe Holden wrote:
>
> JH>Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
> JH>> Doug Barton wrote:
> JH>>> If you're talking about a laptop where you're not sure what the DHCP
> JH>>> server is going to send you, then I have this in /et
On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 11:59:45PM +0200, Peter Ankerst?l wrote:
> I've looked all over the web for some tutorials on how to create
> sub-interfaces i FreeBSD..
> Something like fxp0.1
>
> Should I use ng_ ?
If you mean vlan interfaces, "ifconfig fxp0.1 create" should actually
work if the vlan m
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 01:53:44PM -0700, John Polstra wrote:
> On 26-Sep-2006 Danny Braniss wrote:
> > This keeps bitting me every other upgrade, IPMI on some
> > hosts, if enabled, will steal packets to port 623 or 664, so
> > the current solution is either set net.inet.ip.portrange.lowlast
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 11:30:11AM -0700, Ross Finlayson wrote:
> Folks, I think it's time to reconfigure this mailing list so that
> only subscribers can post to it. (Frankly, I was suprised that this
> isn't already done; most mailing lists these day so this.)
The spam filter was temporarily
On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 10:20:22PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> Your approach is interesting, but I'm not sure I like the idea of adding a
> new semantic to the defaults file.
>
> Would you consider instead modifying network6_interface_setup in
> network.subr to not automatically configure a plip i
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 01:38:40PM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
> On 8/31/06, Rob Watt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >After poking around in various group/pr postings the most similar problem
> >that we found was PR #72970.
> > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=72970
> >
> >Does it seem tha
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 02:02:22PM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Julian Elischer wrote:
> > I need some processes to look elsewhere for DNS information from where
> > the rest
> > of the system looks.. This patch seems to me a simple solution.
> > We over-ride where the resolver looks for reso
Synopsis: [patch] ifconfig name does't rename netgraph node in network.subr
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-rc->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: brooks
Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Aug 28 12:49:02 UTC 2006
Responsible-Changed-Why:
While the proposed workaround is in network.subr, it's no
On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 10:35:03AM +0900, JINMEI Tatuya / [EMAIL
PROTECTED]@C#:H wrote:
> >>>>> On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 13:42:29 -0500,
> >>>>> Brooks Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> >> Um...I'm not sure if this is even possible. Let&#
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 03:21:41PM -0700, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> On Aug 24, 2006, at 3:10 PM, Fredrik Lindberg wrote:
> >>Queries to 254.169.in-addr.arpa MUST return NXDOMAIN (or RCODE 3,
> >>to choose a non-BIND specific term).
> >
> >We're talking about mDNS here, not DNS. I would argue that bec
On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 12:06:31AM +0200, Fredrik Lindberg wrote:
> Brooks Davis wrote:
> >
> >It just occured to me that the daemon could handle this without any
> >interaction with dhclient or the static interface configuration. In the
> >mode where you only want an
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 11:51:55PM +0200, Fredrik Lindberg wrote:
> Pat Lashley wrote:
> >
> >The problem with that is that we want to support the use of both on the
> >same link. So we'd either need to allow more than one keyword, or have
> >'DHCP', 'LLA', 'LLA+DHCP', etc. Neither of those is ve
1 - 100 of 366 matches
Mail list logo
