the PTYS register eth_proto_oper
value of 0x8 corresponds to 50GBase-KR4? Is there a mapping of these
values maintained somewhere?
Thanks again for your help.
>From 4fa642e98b13628660e3612f0f75e42b042c499b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Adam Peace <>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 15:17
ased out in the upstream Linux driver, but
it's not clear to me how the replacement method works. Is this a known
issue? It seems that FreeBSD 12.1 and master still use the method that's
used in 11.3. Does anyone have any insight on this?
Thanks
View online
Only weeks left to sign up for our two-day workshop, How to Write Successful
Proposals in 2019.
Held at: University of Colorado Boulder
December 4 - 5, 2019
8:30 AM to 5:00 PM
Our “must” two-day workshop offers experienced-based guidance and proven tools
to prepare
ny hints for how I can debug this mess would be appreciated.
>
Do you have local_unbound running? It's probably caching the result.
/etc/rc.d/local_unbound stop
Then try your changes to /etc/hosts
fwiw, the default ipv6 line matches the ipv4 short then fqdn.
--
Adam
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
I'll have to get daemontools' svscan out again.
>
haproxy or nginx can do tcp proxy/lb. I haven't used nginx for that
exactly but here's your doc:
https://docs.nginx.com/nginx/admin-guide/load-balancer/tcp-udp-load-balancer/
--
Adam
_
On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 11:37 PM, Victor Sudakov wrote:
> Adam Vande More wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm looking for an internal Wi-Fi NIC with support for
> > >
> > > 1. 802.11n or better 802.11ac
> > > 2. HOSTAP mode
> > > 3. 5 GHz band (bet
. My iwm which
supposedly supports 5 GHz doesn't work there but is okay at 2.
I have no experience with HOSTAP mode.
--
Adam
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
exactly
> this problem. They wouldn't have to recable anything, and they could keep
> their single IP address.
>
What single IP address and what does cabling have to do with it?
--
Adam
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.
ernet card,
> but everything inexpensive seems to be Realtek-based. :-(
>
>
You can get an new but older Intel PCI-E from the big retailer in the sky
for ~$20USD.
--
Adam
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
1/co
> m.ibm.aix.networkcomm/figures/comma35.jpg
>
> thank you
> 3des
>
I believe the application you are looking may be called "protocol".
--
Adam
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
o try FreeBSD 10 in live
mode.
Packet captures are available at
http://static.voltagex.org/freebsd-troubleshooting/iperf.tar.xz in
pcapng format (unpacks to about 750MB, sorry!)
Thanks in advance,
Adam
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailm
or not.
>
> The bug in minidlna was introduced upstream in the latest version, I
> think it's caused by some API difference between FreeBSD and Linux.
>
> Maybe the mediatomb problem has a similar cause, and a similar fix can
> be applied.
>
mediatomb works fine for me,
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Alan Somers wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Russell L. Carter
> wrote:
> > On 12/17/14 18:30, Adam McDougall wrote:
> >>
> >> On 12/17/2014 19:47, Russell L. Carter wrote:
> >>>
> >&
On 12/17/2014 19:47, Russell L. Carter wrote:
>
>
> On 12/17/14 16:07, Rick Macklem wrote:
>> If this is using an exported ZFS volume, it would be nice if you
>> could do the same test using an exported UFS file system, to see if
>> this is ZFS related.
>
> It is indeed using exported ZFS files
On 12/04/2014 16:10, David P. Discher wrote:
>
> On Dec 4, 2014, at 12:50 PM, Alan Somers wrote:
>
>>> Not sure if the attachment will work to the list, but here is a pcap
>>> attached em1 (sudo tcpdump -i em1 -s 0 -w lacp.pcap). Attaching to the
>>> lagg0 with tcpdump, filters out the freebsd
doing?
>
>
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2011-September/027138.html
--
Adam
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 03/18/2014 01:42, Zeus Panchenko wrote:
> hi,
>
> is there any advantage of using vlanXXX vs ifXX.YY notation?
>
> I mean
>
>> ifconfig em0
> vlan777: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500
>ether 00:1b:b9:8b:ca:33
> ...
>vlan: 777 parent interface: em0
>
> vs
>
> em0.555: flags=8843
)
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2013-July/074377.html
--
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
mber one of the issues
> was the
> NIC not being able to allocate buffer space.
>
> /carsten
>
>
> On 06/22/2013 03:11, Adam Hunt wrote:
>
>> I just replaced my old WRT54GS running DD-WRT at home with a proper
>> pfSense
>> firewall. The only real problem I
ridge, an axe bug, a USB bug, some combination of issues, or something
different entirely? I realize I could just leave everything as is but I'd
like to help solve this little mystery. Also, years ago I was taught it's
bad form not to report potential bugs.
Thanks for your help.
--adam
SD Box with PfSense. It
has a lot of managment features built in so if you're looking to get those
without a big time sink otherwise, something like that is the way to go.
--
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.fre
On 01/25/13 12:33, h bagade wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:20 PM, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
h bagade wrote this message on Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 16:59 +0330:
I'm searching for a method or configuration which when I make the
interface
down, the led goes off. Currently the led still remains o
>
> > And I'm connected.
> > Couldn't manage that with BSD. What must I do? Is it even possible?
> > If so, can it be assigned for use on a permanent basis?
> >
> > Thank you for all your time, and consideration.
>
>
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=freebsd+change+
On 10/30/12 11:23, Tom Judge wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I am trying to get if_lagg working in an HP blade for failover between
the 2 in chassis cisco switches, but it would seem that the link state
is not being propagated up to the lagg device.
Any hints/ideas?
dm
ms but cannot be
avoided. On faster machines (e.g. a Pentium II), the performance
impact
is much less noticeable.
--
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
ate 0
bwn0: need multicast update callback
bwn0: RX decryption attempted (old 0 keyidx 0x2)
bwn0: RX decryption attempted (old 0 keyidx 0x2)
If someone would like to tackle this, I can provide access to the hardware
or I will donate the card to the person. Whatever works.
--
Adam Vande
Hm, I guess I can't read. It was bwn, not bwi. Working now.
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Adam Vande More wrote:
> I have a laptop trying to install on. This appears to be the only hangup:
>
> none1@pci0:4:0:0: class=0x028000 card=0x000c1028 chip=0x431514e4
>
gt;From what I can tell, bwi supports this family but not this model. Anyone
know how to enable it?
--
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail t
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> On Monday 20 February 2012 18:03:45 Adam Twardowski wrote:
>> I do still have the kernel and the crash dump. I'll try that fix tonight
>> to see how it goes. Unfortunately, the kernel doesn't usually crash
quot; wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Do you still have the kernel?
>
>
> On 19 February 2012 18:23, Adam Twardowski
wrote:
> > Hello, I submitted a bug report the other day regarding a kernel panic
> > related to the urtw driver. If anyone needs any additional
> > in
Hello, I submitted a bug report the other day regarding a kernel panic
related to the urtw driver. If anyone needs any additional
infromation, please let me know.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=165214
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
several reasons, but ultimately
the fact it's java based and resource intensive required me to go with
zabbix. Zabbix is good too, except for some annoying, non-critical
interface bugs.
--
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing
tests what numbers are you seeing?
>
> Jack
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Adam Stylinski
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 6:47 PM, Adam Stylinski
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 02:22:29PM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
&g
e descriptors to 4K is way overkill and might actually cause
> problems,
> go back to default.
>
> He has a Linux test client, what are you transmitting to?
>
> Jack
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Adam Stylinski
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 0
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 09:52:14AM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
> Adam,
>
> The TX ring for the legacy driver is small right now compared to em, try
> this experiment,
> edit if_lem.c, search for "lem_txd" and change EM_DEFAULT_TXD to 1024, see
> what
> that does, t
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 04:29:42PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
> Try using a large buffer size on iperf and check the flow control options on
> the switch.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Adam Stylinski"
> Just using the default settings with iperf. N
jumbos it will use 9K mbuf clusters. *The number of these
> > allocated by default is small (like 6400 small :) .*
> >
> > I would use 'netstat -m' to see what the pools look like.
>
> Hope this helps. Check the perf with 1500 byte frames.
>
> Adam Stylinsk
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:21:32AM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> On 4/28/2011 11:01 AM, Adam Stylinski wrote:
> >
> > ./netblast 192.168.0.121 5001 32768 30
> >
> > start: 1304002549.184689025
> > finish:1304002579.187555311
> > sen
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:21:32AM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> On 4/28/2011 11:01 AM, Adam Stylinski wrote:
> >
> > ./netblast 192.168.0.121 5001 32768 30
> >
> > start: 1304002549.184689025
> > finish:1304002579.187555311
> > sen
-- Forwarded message --
From: Adam Stylinski
Date: Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:21 AM
Subject: Re: em0 performance subpar
To: Steven Hartland
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 04:08:31PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
> You said your testing with iperf, what settings are you using?
>
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 10:30:31AM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> On 4/28/2011 10:15 AM, Adam Stylinski wrote:
>
> >
> > em0: port 0xe800-0xe83f
> > mem 0xfe9e-0xfe9f,0xfe9c-0xfe9d irq 20 at device 5.0 on pci7
> > em0: [FILTER]
>
> I am
no hot CPUs), I
have 16GB of memory and plenty allocated to the kernel, and I believe flow
control is enabled (should it not be?):
net.inet.flowtable.enable: 1
It's a 16 port netgear gigabit prosafe switch, and it's not likely to be the
problem (like I said,
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 09:38:37AM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> On 4/28/2011 9:29 AM, Adam Stylinski wrote:
> > lspci -lvc:
> >
> > em0@pci0:7:5:0: class=0x02 card=0x13768086 chip=0x107c8086 rev=0x05
> > hdr=0x00
> > vendor = 'Intel Corporation&#
Regards
> Steve
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Mike Tancsa"
> To: "Adam Stylinski"
> Cc:
> Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 2:04 PM
> Subject: Re: em0 performance subpar
>
>
> > On 4/28/2011 3:29 AM, Adam Stylinski wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 09:04:24AM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> On 4/28/2011 3:29 AM, Adam Stylinski wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have an intel gigabit network adapter (the 1000 GT w/chipset 82541PI)
> > which performs poorly in Freebsd compared to the same card in L
ze=10
> sysctl -a net.inet.tcp.delayed_ack=0
> sysctl -w kern.maxvnodes=60
> sysctl -w net.local.dgram.recvspace=8192
> sysctl -w net.local.dgram.maxdgram=8192
> sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.slowstart_flightsize=10
> sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.path_mtu_discovery=0
>
> They'
-- Forwarded message --
From: Adam Stylinski
Date: Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 8:38 AM
Subject: Re: em0 performance subpar
To: Eugene Grosbein
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 05:51:58PM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> On 28.04.2011 14:29, Adam Stylinski wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 2:29 AM, Adam Stylinski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have an intel gigabit network adapter (the 1000 GT w/chipset 82541PI)
> which performs poorly in Freebsd compared to the same card in Linux. I've
> tried this card in two different freebsd boxes and for w
performance on is on 8.2-RELEASE-p1).
Anybody manage to make this card push above 600mbps in ideal network
benchmarks? Any help would be gladly appreciated.
--
Adam Stylinski
PGP Key: http://pohl.ececs.uc.edu/~adam/publickey.pub
Blog: http://technicallyliving.blogspot.com
pgpo6pCvWxDTa.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 05:35:40PM +0200, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> On Thursday, March 31, 2011 17:14:21 Adam Stylinski wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 03:07:15PM +0200, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> > > On Thursday, March 31, 2011 14:20:33 Adam Stylinski wrote:
> > > &
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 05:35:40PM +0200, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> On Thursday, March 31, 2011 17:14:21 Adam Stylinski wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 03:07:15PM +0200, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> > > On Thursday, March 31, 2011 14:20:33 Adam Stylinski wrote:
> > > &
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 03:07:15PM +0200, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> On Thursday, March 31, 2011 14:20:33 Adam Stylinski wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 09:02:45AM +0200, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, March 30, 2011 23:17:53 Adam Stylinski wr
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 09:02:45AM +0200, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 30, 2011 23:17:53 Adam Stylinski wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > This list has helped me before so I'll email again with the hopes that
> > somebody has an answer. All is working w
Hello,
This list has helped me before so I'll email again with the hopes that
somebody has an answer. All is working well with my project, however for
the life of me I cannot get the interface to inject the raw frames faster
than 11mbps. I'm following the example given in
/usr/src/tools/tools/ne
Hello,
I'm somewhat of a novice C programmer endeavoring in a project to write my
own protocol which will sit on top of the 1480 byte 802.3 frames (which are
on top of 802.11 frames) to accomplish remote file transmission. The
communication will be one way, but one roadblock I'm running into is
d
sets.
FreeBSD galacticdominator.com 8.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.2-PRERELEASE #5: Thu
Nov 25 19:14:00 CST 2010
a...@galacticdominator.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
amd64
This nic has been working on the stable branch for over a year from when I
aquired the system and I've never had an issu
Shoot, good catch. It doesn't show up in pciconf nor with the Ubuntu
9.10 CD I have here. Thanks. Guess it's time to get my atheros pccard
working.
Adam
On 4/6/2010 11:00 AM, Rui Paulo wrote:
On 6 Apr 2010, at 14:35, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
I'm having some probl
d, though
I did not change anything on the system. I updated -CURRENT today to
see if doing so would get iwi working again, but it did not.
Adam
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
The following reply was made to PR kern/131162; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Adam K Kirchhoff
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, ad...@voicenet.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/131162: [ath] Atheros driver bugginess and kernel crashes
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 09:27:56 -0400
This can be closed. ath
The following reply was made to PR kern/131153; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Adam K Kirchhoff
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, ad...@voicenet.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/131153: [iwi] iwi doesn't see a wireless network
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 09:26:23 -0400
This bug appears to be resolve
0.326 msec
Seq inner: 2048 iter in 0.691691 sec =0.338 msec
Transfer rates:
outside: 102400 kbytes in 0.722864 sec = 141659 kbytes/sec
middle:102400 kbytes in 0.813619 sec = 125857 kbytes/sec
inside:102400 kbytes in 0.83812
Hi Qing,
This indeed fixes the issue for me!
Thanks very much, I hope to see the patch committed :)
-Adam
Adam Jacob Muller
a...@adam.gs
201-616-0620
On Dec 16, 2009, at 6:39 PM, Li, Qing wrote:
> Hi,
>
> You have reported issues regarding openbgp/bgpd exiting
> abnorm
t have any
7.x systems I can test this on at the moment unfortunately.
I've subverted this check by, simply, not setting quit=1 in main.c when
kr_dispatch_msg() fails, and everything SEEMS to operate normally, i'm kinda
curious to hear thoughts
his with FreeBSD, sorry.
>>
>> Juli.
>>
>>
>
I really don't need anything, I just wanted to know if the steps I'd taken
should work and it's a bug, or if I still need some learnin.
--
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Juli Mallett wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 13:21, Adam Vande More
> wrote:
> > Am I doing something wrong here?
>
> That depends on what you're expecting to happen. What do you think
> tap(4) does and what are you trying t
expected.
FreeBSD it.digitecinc.net 8.0-BETA4 FreeBSD 8.0-BETA4 #2: Mon Sep 7
11:26:25 CDT 2009
vandemo...@it.digitecinc.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
i386
Repost from questions@ several days ago.
Thanks,
--
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-net
In an attempt to get the native drivers working on a particular
wireless network at work I updated to -CURRENT to see if I'd have any
more luck ( http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=131153&cat= ).
Unfortunately, that didn't work out so I was decided to revert to the
ndis drivers. I create
The following reply was made to PR kern/131153; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Adam K Kirchhoff
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, ad...@voicenet.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/131153: [iwi] iwi doesn't see a wireless network
Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 07:58:33 -0400
Since I finally had the chan
The following reply was made to PR kern/131153; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Adam K Kirchhoff
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, ad...@voicenet.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/131153: [iwi] iwi doesn't see a wireless network
Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 07:36:05 -0400
Upgrading to the latest fir
The following reply was made to PR kern/131153; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Adam K Kirchhoff
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, ad...@voicenet.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/131153: [iwi] iwi doesn't see a wireless network
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 06:31:56 -0400
Can anyone at least confirm
The following reply was made to PR kern/131153; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Adam K Kirchhoff
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, ad...@voicenet.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/131153: [iwi] iwi doesn't see a wireless network
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 06:37:18 -0400
FYI, I'm showing the de
The following reply was made to PR kern/131153; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Adam K Kirchhoff
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, ad...@voicenet.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/131153: [iwi] iwi doesn't see a wireless network
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 07:18:15 -0400
This problem persists wit
The following reply was made to PR kern/131153; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Adam K Kirchhoff
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/131153: [iwi] iwi doesn't see a wireless network
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 08:07:48 -0400
There is no wlan0 interface, just iwi0. The o
The following reply was made to PR kern/131153; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Adam K Kirchhoff
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/131153: [iwi] iwi doesn't see a wireless network
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 08:07:48 -0400
There is no wlan0 interface, just iwi0. The o
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 22:38:16 +0100
"Paul B. Mahol" wrote:
> On 2/19/09, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> > On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 05:50:35 -0500
> > Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:48:10 -0500
> >> Adam K Kirchhoff wrot
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 05:50:35 -0500
Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:48:10 -0500
> Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 01:10:08 +0100
> > "Paul B. Mahol" wrote:
> >
> > > On 2/18/09, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> &g
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:48:10 -0500
Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 01:10:08 +0100
> "Paul B. Mahol" wrote:
>
> > On 2/18/09, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> > > --- if_ndis.c 2009-01-31 00:22:11.0 -0500
> > > +++ if_ndis.c.orig
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 01:10:08 +0100
"Paul B. Mahol" wrote:
> On 2/18/09, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> > --- if_ndis.c 2009-01-31 00:22:11.0 -0500
> > +++ if_ndis.c.orig 2009-02-18 14:03:30.0 -0500
> > @@ -2459,6 +2459,11 @@
>
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 13:49:35 -0500
Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:27:36 +0100
> "Paul B. Mahol" wrote:
>
> > On 2/18/09, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> > > On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:33:56 +0100
> > > "Paul B. Mahol" wr
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:27:36 +0100
"Paul B. Mahol" wrote:
> On 2/18/09, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> > On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:33:56 +0100
> > "Paul B. Mahol" wrote:
> >
> >> On 2/18/09, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> >> > On
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:33:56 +0100
"Paul B. Mahol" wrote:
> On 2/18/09, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> > On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 12:06:21 +0100
> > "Paul B. Mahol" wrote:
> >
> >> On 2/17/09, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> >> > On Tuesday 17
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 12:06:21 +0100
"Paul B. Mahol" wrote:
> On 2/17/09, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> > On Tuesday 17 February 2009 17:14:07 Paul B. Mahol wrote:
> >> On 2/17/09, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> >> > On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:22:22 +0100
> >&
On Tuesday 17 February 2009 17:14:07 Paul B. Mahol wrote:
> On 2/17/09, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> > On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:22:22 +0100
> >
> > "Paul B. Mahol" wrote:
> >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=131781
> >>
> >>
guess it should not
> change anything but you never know.
Sorry, I must have copied and pasted the uname output from the wrong
machine. This is actually FreeBSD 7.1-STABLE #4: Mon Feb 16 16:37:18
EST 2009 :-)
Could the fact that the rate is 108 also be causing problems for the
native iwi driv
card while the interface is
trying to acquire an IP address, the kernel panics. Are you seeing
something similar?
Adam
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 19:33:47 +0300
Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello, Freebsd-net.
>
> I'm getting this error on every operation with new Atheros MiniPCI
>
The following reply was made to PR kern/131162; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Adam K Kirchhoff
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, ad...@voicenet.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/131162: [ath] Atheros driver bugginess and kernel crashes
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:08:39 -0500
Is there *anything* else I
The following reply was made to PR kern/131153; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Adam K Kirchhoff
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, ad...@voicenet.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/131153: [iwi] iwi doesn't see a wireless network
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 07:13:43 -0500
Is there anything further I c
The following reply was made to PR kern/131162; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Adam K Kirchhoff
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org,
ad...@voicenet.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/131162: [ath] Atheros driver bugginess and kernel crashes
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:28:06 -0500
--Boundary-00=_WL2gJ
0xe5070d70, ebp = 0 ---
Just as with the iwi driver, this is on 7.1-STABLE... Built today (with DDB
and KDB) but originally pulled from cvsup on January 15th.
Adam
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailSca
The following reply was made to PR kern/131153; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Adam K Kirchhoff
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org,
ad...@voicenet.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/131153: [iwi] iwi doesn't see a wireless network
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 08:05:18 -0500
--Boundary-00=_OsvgJ5oUYA
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 04:23:15 -0500
Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 19:17:38 -0800
> Sam Leffler wrote:
>
> > Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> > > I'm trying to get my laptop to connect to the wireless access point at
> > > work. It has a Intel Pro
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 19:17:38 -0800
Sam Leffler wrote:
> Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> > I'm trying to get my laptop to connect to the wireless access point at
> > work. It has a Intel Pro Wireless 2200BG minipci card, and can
> > associate with my access point at home.
cessive retries:0 Invalid misc:0 Missed beacon:3
The only thing I can think of is that the AP is using some feature that
the iwi driver, or wpa_supplicant, doesn't support.
Is there someway to get this working?
Adam
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content b
Hello,
I am running an IPCop firewall for my entire network. I have a
wireless network device on the blue subnet which must access a freebsd NFS
server. In order to do this, I need to open a DMZ pinhole on a few select
ports. It's my understanding that NFS chooses random ports and I was
wo
I have an mcp67 nforce networking controller using the nfe driver. I
currently cannot set my MTU to anything higher than 1500. The controller
definitely supports jumbo frames. Is there any hope of the BSD driver
supporting it? I'm more than willing to test things out.
I guess another question
Are the NFS mounts UDP or TCP on Linux and FreeBSD? I believe FreeBSD
still defaults to UDP which can act differently especially for NFS.
On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 05:30:35PM -0700, David Kwan wrote:
I've attempt many standard and non-standard permutations of the tcp
tuning parameters without
This issue is not a personal problem of mine.
As I have alrady mentioned a lot of people have been reporting this issue
without any answer.
It's really sad that you've been unpolite and agressive to me just because I
labelled the message HP.
Does it really worth this overreaction?
Well, let t
I guess it does, since this nightmere is being reported with different NICs
and drivers including Intel NICs on em driver and 3Com NICs on bge and xl
drivers on 6.3-RELEASE , 6-STABLE, 7.0-RELEAE and 7-STABLE.
The mailing list if full of too many questions regarding this issue and no
answer!
Sure! Here you are!
GBRT2# pciconf -lv | grep -A 3 bge
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:1:0: class=0x02 card=0x100410b7 chip=0x164514e4 rev=0x15
hdr=0x00
vendor = 'Broadcom Corporation'
device = 'BCM5701 NetXtreme BCM5701 Gigabit Ethernet'
class = network
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:2:0:
As a follow-up to my previous output, this is also my custom kernel, just in
case:
#
# GENERIC -- Generic kernel configuration file for FreeBSD/i386
# FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE
# For more information on this file
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
