https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228210
--- Comment #2 from Rodney W. Grimes ---
I would also suggest when do attempt to ping a numeric address to include the
-n optino to ping, otherwise you may still get a significant delay, which looks
like a non response situation, if reverse
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228210
Rodney W. Grimes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||n...@freebsd.org,
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228210
Dag-Erling Smørgrav changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|New |Open
Assignee|n...
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228210
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|wireless|misc
Assignee|wirel...@fr
To view an individual PR, use:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users,
which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering
all versions including experimental development code and ob
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194485
Hiroki Sato changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||h...@freebsd.org
Assignee|
Hi,
I have mixed types of configurations. I’ll give it a run next week.
So far I have tried a tunnel with if_ipsec and strongswan at one end and gif
and racoon at the other end. I have tried if_ipsec with strongswan on both ends.
I’ll start with recompiling racoon today and using it to see if i
On 08.05.2018 16:51, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
> I think for proper support of several if_ipsec interfaces racoon needs
> some patches. But I have not spare time to do this job.
> I recommend to use strongswan, it has active developers that are
> responsive and may give some help at least.
Hi,
Tod
