https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206185
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org|freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
--
You are
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206186
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org|freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
--
You are
13.01.2016, 22:56, "Karim Fodil-Lemelin" :
> Hi,
>
> I've hit a very interesting problem with ipfw-nat and local TCP traffic
> that has enough TCP options to hit a special case in m_megapullup().
> Here is the story:
>
> I am using the following NIC:
>
> igb0@pci0:4:0:0: class=0x02 card=0x8
This looks mostly sensible. hm!
-a
On 13 January 2016 at 11:55, Karim Fodil-Lemelin
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've hit a very interesting problem with ipfw-nat and local TCP traffic that
> has enough TCP options to hit a special case in m_megapullup(). Here is the
> story:
>
> I am using the following
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203524
fodillemlinka...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fodillemlinka...@gmail.
Hi,
I've hit a very interesting problem with ipfw-nat and local TCP traffic
that has enough TCP options to hit a special case in m_megapullup().
Here is the story:
I am using the following NIC:
igb0@pci0:4:0:0:class=0x02 card=0x8086 chip=0x150e8086
rev=0x01 hdr=0x00
And wh
Hi Hans,
Can you give an example of draining the callouts?
Thanks,
-Fred
On 1/13/16 7:33 AM, "Lakshmi Narasimhan Sundararajan"
mailto:lakshm...@msystechnologies.com>> wrote:
Hi Hans,
Yes, we understand that piece of code.
But Panasas wants this change to MFC to 10.3. This issue is not seen in
On 01/13/16 14:15, Lewis, Fred wrote:
Hi Hans,
Can you give an example of draining the callouts?
Hi,
man 9 callout_drain
and
man 9 callout_async_drain (11-current)
callout_drain() might sleep and needs a context which allows for that.
Else use callout_async_drain().
--HPS
_
Hi Hans,
Yes, we understand that piece of code.
But Panasas wants this change to MFC to 10.3. This issue is not seen in 11.
Would that happen? I have not seen acknowledgement of this issue or
confirmation of MFC to 10.3. That information will help us plan.
Regards,
LN
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 6:0
On 01/12/16 22:13, Lewis, Fred wrote:
In earlier versions of lagg_ioctl() (e.g. stable/10/r171247) all of the callout
vectors are set to NULL which I think will prevent the problem. Similar NULLing
code
is also in stable/7. I didn't check other releases.
Don't forget to drain the callouts befo
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 10:53 PM, Boris Astardzhiev
wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> In my spare time I did the following simple libc-only implementation of the
> syscalls.
> I did some tests in a VM adapting these experiments:
> https://blog.cloudflare.com/how-to-receive-a-million-packets/
On Dragonfl
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 04:53:25PM +0200, Boris Astardzhiev wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> In my spare time I did the following simple libc-only implementation of the
> syscalls.
> I did some tests in a VM adapting these experiments:
> https://blog.cloudflare.com/how-to-receive-a-million-packets/
>
>
12 matches
Mail list logo