Re: kern/121257: [tcp] TSO + natd -> slow outgoing tcp traffic

2009-06-09 Thread Takefu
The following reply was made to PR kern/121257; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Takefu To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, vn...@vnovy.net Cc: Subject: Re: kern/121257: [tcp] TSO + natd -> slow outgoing tcp traffic Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:14:42 +0900 > Dropped Receive Packets on Half-duplex 10

Re: kern/134557: [netgraph] [hang] 7.2 with mpd5.3 hanging up - ng_pptp problem

2009-06-09 Thread Bohdan Tymkiv
The following reply was made to PR kern/134557; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Bohdan Tymkiv To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, sergei.cherv...@gmail.com Cc: Subject: Re: kern/134557: [netgraph] [hang] 7.2 with mpd5.3 hanging up - ng_pptp problem Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 19:12:28 +0300 I confirm

Re: Unable to clone wlan device

2009-06-09 Thread Sam Leffler
As Paul mentioned iwi supports only 1 vap at a time. ral supports multiple vaps but only 1 ap vap + N wds vaps. It may be possible to support more complex configurations with some ralink parts (e.g. 2860 and later) but noone has made the effort. Not sure about the tkip comment. The output o

Re: Unable to clone wlan device

2009-06-09 Thread Vladimir Terziev
Hi Paul, this is very very important info. It means i should be able to do it once i find the actual problem. Thanks, Vladimir On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 15:18 +0300, Paul B. Mahol wrote: > On 6/9/09, Vladimir Terziev wrote: > > The actual problem, i play with wlan cloning because of, is, i try >

Re: Unable to clone wlan device

2009-06-09 Thread Paul B. Mahol
On 6/9/09, Vladimir Terziev wrote: > The actual problem, i play with wlan cloning because of, is, i try to > set up a FreeBSD based wireless access point either based on ral(4) or > iwi(4) interface. > > The ral(4) (which is "Edimax EW-7128g") seems more suitable for that, > since it has HOSTAP ca

Re: Unable to clone wlan device

2009-06-09 Thread Vladimir Terziev
The actual problem, i play with wlan cloning because of, is, i try to set up a FreeBSD based wireless access point either based on ral(4) or iwi(4) interface. The ral(4) (which is "Edimax EW-7128g") seems more suitable for that, since it has HOSTAP capability, but when i tried to run a hostapd(8)

Re: Unable to clone wlan device

2009-06-09 Thread Paul B. Mahol
On 6/9/09, Vladimir Terziev wrote: > Thanks Paul, > > i have tried the same with ral(4) device and got a similar result. > > What about ral(4), does it support virtual interfaces ? No it doesn't. The only chips capable of multi bssid I'm aware of are atheros ones and only on >= 8.0. > On Tue, 20

Re: Unable to clone wlan device

2009-06-09 Thread Vladimir Terziev
Thanks Paul, i have tried the same with ral(4) device and got a similar result. What about ral(4), does it support virtual interfaces ? Regards, Vladimir On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 11:34 +0300, Paul B. Mahol wrote: > wlan cloning is only available on 8.0, and iwi supports only one > virtual > inte

Re: Unable to clone wlan device

2009-06-09 Thread Paul B. Mahol
wlan cloning is only available on 8.0, and iwi supports only one virtual interface at any time. -- Paul ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscr

Unable to clone wlan device

2009-06-09 Thread Vladimir Terziev
Hi, on FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE (i386) driven machine, with iwi(4) (Intel PRO/Wireless 2915ABG), i try to create a clone of the iwi0 device. Here is the device info: $ ifconfig iwi0 iwi0: flags=8802 metric 0 mtu 1500 ether 00:16:6f:8a:ee:4b media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autos

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2009-06-09 Thread Hiroki Sato
"Bjoern A. Zeeb" wrote in <20090609074144.o22...@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net>: bz> On Tue, 9 Jun 2009, Xin LI wrote: bz> bz> > Danny Braniss wrote: bz> >>> Xin, good day. bz> >>> bz> >>> Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 04:49:36PM -0700, Xin LI wrote: bz> The attached patch should fix this, any objectio

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2009-06-09 Thread Danny Braniss
> Xin, good day. > > Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 04:49:36PM -0700, Xin LI wrote: > > The attached patch should fix this, any objections? > > Yes, you missed negation operator in the copyin check. The issue > was already fixed by hrs@ two hours ago: > http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base?view=revision&r

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2009-06-09 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On Tue, 9 Jun 2009, Xin LI wrote: Danny Braniss wrote: Xin, good day. Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 04:49:36PM -0700, Xin LI wrote: The attached patch should fix this, any objections? Yes, you missed negation operator in the copyin check. The issue was already fixed by hrs@ two hours ago: http://s

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2009-06-09 Thread Xin LI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Danny Braniss wrote: >> Xin, good day. >> >> Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 04:49:36PM -0700, Xin LI wrote: >>> The attached patch should fix this, any objections? >> Yes, you missed negation operator in the copyin check. The issue >> was already fixed by hrs@