On Saturday 14 October 2006 09:14, Dan b wrote:
> I searched the archives for this and was unable to
> find anything relevant. I have a machine that is
> being used as a NAT Router with IPFW and IPNAT running
> 5.3-RELEASE. I'm only using IPFW to keep track of
> traffic, no actual packet filterin
Hi,
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 12:59:38 -0700
"Crist J. Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 11:23:50AM +0200, Daniel Hartmeier wrote:
> > [ I'm CC'ing Crist, maybe he can explain why -e behaves like it does ]
[hided]
> So, to expand on the three points above, we need (1) fixed
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 04:55:18PM +0200, Joerg Pernfuss wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 16:32:01 +0200
> VANHULLEBUS Yvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I don't know what will happen if you define IPSEC_NAT_T, but not IPSEC
> > / FAST_IPSEC, guess it will generate the same thing as if you didn'
>
Hello,
I have to make a router with an ATM 155Mb/s interface ProSum PROATMFM on
77252 chipset. I heard that this card has a serious problem with small
packets on FreeBSD operating system.
Which version shoul I used? Maybe FreeBSD-CURRENT (AKA 7.0-CURRENT)?
Please advice,
Best regards
Peter
Hello,
I searched the archives for this and was unable to
find anything relevant. I have a machine that is
being used as a NAT Router with IPFW and IPNAT running
5.3-RELEASE. I'm only using IPFW to keep track of
traffic, no actual packet filtering is going on.
The problem is that the statistics
