On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 04:55:18PM +0200, Joerg Pernfuss wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 16:32:01 +0200
> VANHULLEBUS Yvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > I don't know what will happen if you define IPSEC_NAT_T, but not IPSEC
> > / FAST_IPSEC, guess it will generate the same thing as if you didn'
> > define IPSEC_NAT_T.
> 
> Or it won't compile because some defines are missing, just like umass
> breaks without scbus.

Maybe.

But as quite all NAT-T code is inside IPSEC/FAST_IPSEC, it may also
just compile cleanly.



Yvan.

-- 
NETASQ
http://www.netasq.com
_______________________________________________
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to