On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 04:55:18PM +0200, Joerg Pernfuss wrote: > On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 16:32:01 +0200 > VANHULLEBUS Yvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I don't know what will happen if you define IPSEC_NAT_T, but not IPSEC > > / FAST_IPSEC, guess it will generate the same thing as if you didn' > > define IPSEC_NAT_T. > > Or it won't compile because some defines are missing, just like umass > breaks without scbus.
Maybe. But as quite all NAT-T code is inside IPSEC/FAST_IPSEC, it may also just compile cleanly. Yvan. -- NETASQ http://www.netasq.com _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
