On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 05:51:28PM -0400, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> < said:
>
> > I agree, then... Isn't it already the purpose of RTF_CLONING ?
> > When should RTF_PRCLONIG be set ?
>
> RTF_PRCLONING is set automatically by the protocol to cause host
> routes to be generated on every unique looku
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 06:14:29PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I was wondering how to modify the appropriate files to setup a FreeBSD
> computer to act as a NAT Router, that would do the following:
>
Check the natd(8) man page, it should give you a good start. Chapter
19.12 in the handbook
Netgraph in 5.0 had to be alterred to support SMP locking.
at teh same time some 'simplificatiosn were made, however changing a
driver from one, to work witht he orther is relatively simple..
Major changes:
Instead of passing separate message and o-o-band data, both are
attached to a single 'item
As the subject says,
i developed a netgraph node (it's classifier node)
using a 5.x box but tonight, i had a bad
surprise:
it seems the netgraph implemntation in 4.x and 5.x
are different, so now.
Could someone shed some light on the differences, please?
Thanks.
--
Paolo
GUFI: http://www.
Yeah, you'd hope so huh. When I asked them I got a "we can neither confirm
nor deny that we may someday release drivers" reply. I took that to mean
that yeah, someday we may see them - but don't hold your breath. Oh well,
I guess I'll stress it more once I actually get one in to mess with.
> >
I was wondering how to modify the appropriate files to setup a FreeBSD
computer to act as a NAT Router, that would do the following:
One NIC card is connected to a private network, with an IP address of
192.168.0.50. This will act as the gateway to all the computers in the
technology center, to
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 05:51:28PM -0400, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> RTF_XRESOLVE is set when the target of the newly cloned route is not
> known by the kernel and must be set up by a user process. I'm not
> sure if anything ever used this, although I guess it could be used to
> implement ISIS.
I h
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 11:45:28PM +0200, Vincent Jardin wrote:
> I do not understand the purpose of the flag PRCLONING. What is it for ?
Compare the output of netstat -rn with netstat -rna, to see the
difference between a cloned and a protocol-cloned route.
BMS
__
< said:
> I agree, then... Isn't it already the purpose of RTF_CLONING ?
> When should RTF_PRCLONIG be set ?
RTF_PRCLONING is set automatically by the protocol to cause host
routes to be generated on every unique lookup.
RTF_CLONING is set when the route is added (either manually, or
automatical
I do not understand the purpose of the flag PRCLONING. What is it for ?
man rtalloc:
RTF_PRCLONING routes are assumed to be managed
by the protocol family and no resolution requests are made, but all
routes generated by the cloning process retain a reference to the route
from which they were g
On Tuesday 22 July 2003 11:14, Van Vinh Vo wrote:
> what is net/1 ? net/2 ? net/3,
> what is the current net now ?
1) These questions are NOT suitable for the -net mailing list, which is
for discussing development of networking stacks in FreeBSD. If you
must ask this sort of drivel, please do s
Current FreeBSD problem reports
Critical problems
Serious problems
Non-critical problems
S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description
---
o [2002/05/04] kern/37761 net process exits but socket is still ESTAB
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 12:48:06PM BST, Andy Gilligan wrote:
> pass in on gif0 to gif1:2001:2000::1 from 2001:222:222::/48 to any
> pass in on gif0 to gif2:2001:3000::1 from 2001:333:333::/48 to any
^^^
That should of course read 'pass out' :)
-Andy
__
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 10:03:53AM BST, Juan Rodriguez Hervella wrote:
> On Monday 28 July 2003 07:17, Andy Gilligan wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have three IPv6 /48 networks connected to a FreeBSD 4.8 router, and I
> > allocate /64 tunnels from each network to client machines.
> >
> > Is there any way
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 07:27:38PM -0600, Brett Glass wrote:
B> I haven't gotten any hopes up, but it would be nice. It seems as
B> if the only alternatives are to un-GNU PoPToP (which requires
B> a clean room team; possible but not easy) or to create a FreeBSD
B> pptpd that is analogous to pppoed.
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 11:37:57PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
R> I pretty much agree. Attached are my configuration files
R> for mpd/pptp; please let me know (Julian) how this could
R> be enhanced to serve more PPTP clients simultaneously
R> (with different IP addresses). I'd appreciate it.
Yo
On Monday 28 July 2003 07:17, Andy Gilligan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have three IPv6 /48 networks connected to a FreeBSD 4.8 router, and I
> allocate /64 tunnels from each network to client machines.
>
> Is there any way I can specify the next-hop or outbound interface to use
> on the router based on the
17 matches
Mail list logo
