On Thu, 27 May 1999, Doug White wrote:
> If anyone had a DV (FireWire) camera they could make available, I could
> ship my mac G3/350 down and edit the data it into video clips, then serve
> it with QuickTime Streaming. Put together a decent webpage for it all ...
> burn it to CD... whee ... :)
On Fri, 9 Jul 1999, Axis wrote:
> I have been using *BSD* for around 3 years now. My problem is thatI have
> always used the console for system administration duties. I really want to
> put a kick *** system together to run X with all of the luxuries.
> I have noticed there is not that much suppor
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000, Charlie ROOT wrote:
> Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2000 21:31:12 +0400 (MSD)
> From: Charlie ROOT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Users started "subscribing" in this manner? Congratulations, FreeBSD
Can monkeys' owners keep them from posting to lists? Please?
On Thu, 2 Nov 2000, Peter Wagner wrote:
> Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2000 09:34:46 -
> From: Peter Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: FreeBSD Hackers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: US PRESIDENT AND FBI SECRETS =PLEASE VISIT =>
> (
On Thu, 2 Nov 2000, Mike Silbersack wrote:
> Just having the list ensure that it was in the To: or Cc: header would be
> sufficient in this case. Such a change would block relay spam as well.
Some places with not-so-nice connectivity to the rest of the Internet
use local lists to distribute
On Thu, 16 Nov 2000, Nicolai Petri wrote:
> What's the best approach for a simple web-server(never more the 10 clients)
> ? Is it using pthread and a thread per connection . Or to make a
> non-blocking single thread server. Can people show me some simple examples
> of the 2 techniques ?
>
> And
On Thu, 16 Nov 2000, Jamie Heckford wrote:
> Very sorry for posting such a dumb question, but since I cvs'upd something
> weird seems to have happened.
>
> I am using this to compile my X app (which just uses Xlib.h at the mo)
>
> gcc -L/usr/X11R6/include -o test test.cc
>
> but it cannot loca
On Wed, 22 Nov 2000, Nicolai Petri wrote:
> I hope someone can help me with this issue..
>
> When the application recieves a SIGPIPE the thread hangs hard.. What is the
> correct thing to do when a socket is closed by the remote end ??
When application receives SIGPIPE the correct thing to do
On Sun, 24 Dec 2000, Wes Peters wrote:
> > To be pedantic, you only need to provide source for works derived
> > from GPL'd software which in this case means the kernel propper. User
> > land applications and device drivers may be shipped in binary-only
> > form because they are separate works, e
On Sun, 24 Dec 2000, Warner Losh wrote:
> One could argue that adding a driver is a derived work. You are
> modifying tables in the kernel with references to your device, and the
> rest comes in under the contamination theory. Until the matter has
> been properly adjudicated, you cannot say wit
On Sun, 24 Dec 2000, Warner Losh wrote:
> : No. This issue was beaten to death multiple times, large amount of
> : software was created based on this, and its legality is absolutely
> : certain by now.
>
> No. You are wrong. The fact that large amounts of software has been
> created is irrel
On Mon, 25 Dec 2000, Warner Losh wrote:
> Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2000 11:32:03 -0700
> From: Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Alex Belits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT
>
> In message <[EM
On Tue, 14 Aug 2001, Devin Butterfield wrote:
> > Some
All
> >versions of the metricom modems would allow point to point
> > communications when they weren't on the merticom net. I don't know if
> > this driver is for one of these or not, but it might not be a bad
> > thing to do if so. I'l
On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, David Schultz wrote:
> Thus spake echo dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I am pooling in as many different ways of sorting data in C i can anyone
> > have a fav??? If anyone can give me some ideas on the best way to sort data
> > in C would be helpful.. Thanks
>
> I've always been
On Fri, 9 Jul 1999, Axis wrote:
> I have been using *BSD* for around 3 years now. My problem is thatI have
> always used the console for system administration duties. I really want to
> put a kick *** system together to run X with all of the luxuries.
> I have noticed there is not that much suppo
On Tue, 28 Sep 1999, Darren R. Davis wrote:
> I believe that a Bus Error is specifically referencing miss aligned data vs
> segmentation violation
> (SIGSEGV) which is accessing data that is either free'd or not yours, etc.
> I always thought
> it strange on an Intel processor, since this was mor
On Wed, 29 Sep 1999, Konstantin Chuguev wrote:
> Or Netscape crashes with SIGBUS in SIGSEGV handler? :-)
This is what I mean "in disguise" -- however SIGBUS seems to be
intentional.
strace output on Linux (21116 is netscape's pid):
---8<---
oldselect(9, [8], NULL, NULL, {1, 0}) = ? ERESTART
On Tue, 5 Oct 1999, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
> > Just a question: has the Quickcam and ColorQuickcam (if there was any)
> > been removed from the kernel? And, if yes, for what reason?
>
> Well, people tried to once. I do not recall what happened in the
> end. The reason was that the driver did no
On Mon, 6 Mar 2000, James FitzGibbon wrote:
> > Some comments? Isn't so?
>
> In my experience, threads are the perfect way to speed up an I/O bound
> application. While one thread is blocked in iowait, others can be
> performing operations that do not contend for the same resource
> (calculatio
On Mon, 20 Mar 2000, MikeM wrote:
> Has anyone thought of Unicode support on FreeBSD?
Really the question is much more basic -- who benefits from having
Unicode (or Unicode in the form of UTF-8) support. It isn't me for sure
-- I am Russian.
--
Alex
On Mon, 3 Apr 2000, G. Adam Stanislav wrote:
> > Really the question is much more basic -- who benefits from having
> >Unicode (or Unicode in the form of UTF-8) support. It isn't me for sure
>
> Everyone who works with multilingual documents.
I feel perfectly fine with "multilingual" documen
On Mon, 3 Apr 2000, G. Adam Stanislav wrote:
> At 20:59 03-04-2000 -0700, Alex Belits wrote:
> > I feel perfectly fine with "multilingual" documents that contain English
> >and Russian text without Unicode.
>
> Those are bilingual, not multilingual. I o
On Tue, 4 Apr 2000, G. Adam Stanislav wrote:
> At 22:51 03-04-2000 -0700, Alex Belits wrote:
> > I agree that Unicode created a good list of glyphs, and it can be
> >useful for fonts and conversion tables, but it's completely inappropriate
> >as the base of format used
On Tue, 4 Apr 2000, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> I don't understand what possible benefit there is in having *NO*
> options to deal with all the language-characters in the world. Even
> if unicode isn't perfect, it is a damn sight better than nothing.
The existing "market" of multilingual appli
On Tue, 4 Apr 2000, Anatoly Vorobey wrote:
> You mean, MIME multipart documents are better than Unicode if I, for instance,
> want to handle Tolstoy's "War and Peace" with French quotes in the middle of
> Russian sentences?
>
> I don't think so.
This is what multipart format exists for --
On Tue, 4 Apr 2000, Alex Belits wrote:
> > You mean, MIME multipart documents are better than Unicode if I, for instance,
> > want to handle Tolstoy's "War and Peace" with French quotes in the middle of
> > Russian sentences?
> >
> > I don
On Tue, 4 Apr 2000, G. Adam Stanislav wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 04, 2000 at 05:05:05PM -0700, Alex Belits wrote:
> > The existing "market" of multilingual application is so small, and it's
> >based on so simplistic requirements (to be able to display and print
> &
On Wed, 5 Apr 2000, G. Adam Stanislav wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 04, 2000 at 07:19:06PM -0700, Alex Belits wrote:
> > It is. However if you look at the current efforts of its "adoption", it
> >is not used as one. It's touted as the solution to all language-related
&g
On Wed, 5 Apr 2000, Taavi Talvik wrote:
> > the _replacement_ for languages/charsets handling infrastructure -- "we
> > know all the characters, so we can write all the words, right?".
>
> Multilingual tools market and small? Get real - just China and India
> together are >2 billion possible use
On Wed, 5 Apr 2000, Anatoly Vorobey wrote:
> > that the way that TeX handles such a text is even more inconvenient,
> > however even now it's most likely that TeX would be used for this kind of
> > typesetting.
>
> But we're *not* talking about typesetting -- rather about multilingual
> text ha
On Wed, 5 Apr 2000, Jason wrote:
> > i18n needs such as non-English users? Linguists don't see Unicode as being
> > sufficient,
>
> What do you mean by "Linguists don't see Unicode as being sufficient"?
> Where I work, we have a gaggle of linguists and are currenly posting our
> software to UNIC
On 5 Apr 2000, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> > > the most inclusive one in existence.
> >
> > It is. However if you look at the current efforts of its "adoption", it
> > is not used as one. It's touted as the solution to all language-related
> > problems, as a replacement of language/charset l
On 5 Apr 2000, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Unicode certainly *is* sufficient as a character repertoire since
> it aims to include all the scripts in the world. This goal hasn't
> been achieved yet, but for some time now Unicode has been expanding
> into areas where *no* previous character sets
On Wed, 5 Apr 2000, G. Adam Stanislav wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 05, 2000 at 03:51:29PM -0700, Alex Belits wrote:
> > I think, I have heard statements like this way too much in my life --
> >"Communism is the bright future of the humankind -- this goal hasn't been
> >ac
On Wed, 5 Apr 2000, G. Adam Stanislav wrote:
> > Lack of extensibility and variants. Don't they just love the great
> >extensibility means aka non-standardized and non-standardizable "private
> >use area" that defeats the whole idea of having a standard charset?
>
> Absurd! The private use area
On Thu, 6 Apr 2000, Patryk Zadarnowski wrote:
> > without destabilizing "standards" by constant changes.
>
> Can it? People have been begging ISO to standarise 8 bit charsets for ages.
> If you tried to exchange information in polish in the pre-8859 days, you'd
> know why (about five radically d
On Thu, 6 Apr 2000, Nikolai Saoukh wrote:
> > koi8-r, one of the oldest cyrillic charsets, primarily designed to keep
> > "intuitive" mapping to ASCII, to remain usable after passing through
> > characters-mangling old software and to be readable on 7-bit dumb
> > terminals -- and the last ment
On Thu, 6 Apr 2000, Anatoly Vorobey wrote:
> > Can you guess, which one of of multiple cyrillic charsets never was
> > actually used in Russia?
> >
> > ISO 8859-5.
>
> It's actually being used quite often now by users of MS Outlook 2000
> (those of them not sophisticated enough to select th
On Fri, 7 Apr 2000, Kazutaka YOKOTA wrote:
> Multilingual text processing in the userland is a completely different
> issue which, I think, should be discussed separately.
I agree with this completely. The question is, where?
--
Alex
-
On Thu, 4 May 2000, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> :Lloyd Rennie VBCnet GB Ltd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> The 'virus' is the warning message itself, silly!
>
> -Matt
Nope -- it was a genuine virus copy, self-replicating thr
40 matches
Mail list logo
