On Wed, 5 Apr 2000, Jason wrote:
> > i18n needs such as non-English users? Linguists don't see Unicode as being
> > sufficient,
>
> What do you mean by "Linguists don't see Unicode as being sufficient"?
> Where I work, we have a gaggle of linguists and are currenly posting our
> software to UNICODE (UCS-2 encoded). Actually, of all people, the "linguists"
> seems to like it the most (besides some wanting UCS-4).
Lack of extensibility and variants. Don't they just love the great
extensibility means aka non-standardized and non-standardizable "private
use area" that defeats the whole idea of having a standard charset?
--
Alex
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Excellent.. now give users the option to cut your hair you hippie!
-- Anonymous Coward
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
