> What 3d acceleration can you do with X4 WRT OpenGL?
Well, I've gotten things set up to where GLX shows up as an extention
and XFree86 claims the glx module is loaded. How much actual
"hardware acceleration" is used or taken advantage of by the 4.0.x
code is hard to say without looking at it in
> Meaning, 3.3.6 + utah_glx outperforms by a factor of two 4.0.2 + DRI?!
I'm sorry if that bothers you, but you're more than free to try and
reproduce my results. :)
- Jordan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
> Or, even better, 4.0.2 + "suppose-we-managed-to-port-it nvidia kernel
> module" + nvidia binary 'nvidia' replacement module for XFree-4's 'nv'
> driver? I mean, will 336/utah be better??
I can't measure vaporware. Supposing that all were to happen, I
suppose we'd just have to benchmark it and
Guys,
I'm testing the *currently available* bits, I'm not testing anything
in 4.0.x we don't actually support right now (erm, how would I?) and
all I'm really doing is verifying that the GLX extention is provided
in both cases and that the test application is linked against the
appropriate glx-aw
Jordan Hubbard wrote:
>
> > What 3d acceleration can you do with X4 WRT OpenGL?
>
> Well, I've gotten things set up to where GLX shows up as an extention
> and XFree86 claims the glx module is loaded. How much actual
> "hardware acceleration" is used or taken advantage of by the 4.0.x
> code is
> I know very little about how kernel or low level processor stuff works, but
> shouldn't we be able to do a 4GB process on a 32-bit system?
> The limitation of 2GB per process should only be an issue if there is some
> need to use signed numbers, right?
Well, that single 4GB of address space is
> I'm a little confused at this point. Does X 4 support utah-glx? Or are you
> referring to the GLX module that comes with X 4? I had to tweak my X 4
The latter. X 4 doesn't support utah-glx.
- Jordan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body
Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
>
> Actually, there's one more question I have about XFree-4. IIUC, core GL
> libs, such as libGL.so, libOSMesa.so, etc are included in XFree 4.0.2 core
> distribution. So how come that lots of applications still have Mesa-3.2
> in their dependencies?
>
The Mesa bits i
On Sat, Mar 10, 2001 at 12:03:18PM -0800, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
> The handbook is wrong. Unidiffs are a far more advanced lifeform
> than context diffs. :)
>
> - Jordan
[scads of other replies deleted]
Okay, okay, okay...
docs/25735 is a patch for this. I assume one of the -doc team will
pic
On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, Jose M. Alcaide wrote:
> Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> >
> > Actually, there's one more question I have about XFree-4. IIUC, core GL
> > libs, such as libGL.so, libOSMesa.so, etc are included in XFree 4.0.2 core
> > distribution. So how come that lots of applications still hav
At 10:37 PM 03/10/2001, Peter Seebach wrote:
>If anyone has a specific part number or model information about the new
>unsupported PHY, I'd be happy to look it up and tell you what, if anything,
>I can find out. I can't send out copies of the source without some kind
>of formal approval, but I co
The following email from an Nvidia employee is very informative:
http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=171177+175462+/usr/local/www/db/text/2000/freebsd-hackers/2910.freebsd-hackers
He says, "There are exactly 3 source files which need to be ported from
linux to freebsd, then after tha
On 12-Mar-01 Joseph Gleason wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Alfred Perlstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Ian Campbell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2001 23:41
> Subject: Re: Greater than 2GB per process
>
>
>> * Ian Campbell <[EMAIL P
Howdy oZZ,
No, you've misunderstood, since this 3.4 system used to
see wdc1 and had partitions/slices mounted from /dev/fstab (wd2s*)
an upgrade would only further complicate the situation.
I'm just hoping someone here can point out to me what I
might have re-configured to have made it g
Howdy Ceri,
Thank you for the thought but I don't think that applies
here.
fbsd:~> uname -a
FreeBSD playground 3.4-RELEASE FreeBSD 3.4-RELEASE #1
Since the original install put / in /etc/fstab on /dev/wd0s3a,
I'm inclined to think that's where it should be for this version
of F
I would like anyone who has a fxp card which doesn't work with
the current driver to contact me in order to test out an alternate
driver.
--
Jonathan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
:
:Noted.
:
:Is there a gcc PR associated with this?
:
:http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl
:
:A GNATS searc for "freebsd kernel" didn't return anything.
:
:-Charles
No idea. Somewhere around 4.1 my -O2 and -Os kernel compiles just
stopped working. There was a bunch of stuff on the
At 02:45 PM 03/12/2001, Jonathan Lemon wrote:
> I would like anyone who has a fxp card which doesn't work with
>the current driver to contact me in order to test out an alternate
>driver.
>--
>Jonathan
in case you havent read my posts, I've fixed the problem with mine.
Dennis
To Unsubscribe:
Turning PNP on into the BIOS and recompiling the Kernel with options PNPBIOS
brings the problem back:
fxp0: could not map memory !
Rafael Tonin
- Original Message -
From: "Richard Hodges" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Dag-Erling Smorgrav" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sun
> Turning PNP on into the BIOS and recompiling the Kernel with options PNPBIOS
> brings the problem back:
>
> fxp0: could not map memory !
Turn "PnP OS" off in your BIOS. We're not ready to deal with this yet.
DES unfortunately doesn't really understand the issues here.
> Rafael Tonin
>
>
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 04:44:38PM -0500, Dennis wrote:
> At 02:45 PM 03/12/2001, Jonathan Lemon wrote:
> > I would like anyone who has a fxp card which doesn't work with
> >the current driver to contact me in order to test out an alternate
> >driver.
> >--
> >Jonathan
>
> in case you havent re
Linux has some support for ECC error detection:
http://www.anime.net/~goemon/linux-ecc/
I've ported ECC 0.12 to a FreeBSD kld and it seems to work.
A couple of minor changes:
commented out probe_450gx because the compiler was
giving some plausible warnings
check if ecc_mode
Linux has some support for ECC error detection:
http://www.anime.net/~goemon/linux-ecc/
I've ported ECC 0.12 to a FreeBSD kld and it seems to work.
A couple of minor changes:
commented out probe_450gx because the compiler was
giving some plausible warnings
check if ecc_mode
At 04:44 PM 03/12/2001, Jonathan Lemon wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 04:44:38PM -0500, Dennis wrote:
> > At 02:45 PM 03/12/2001, Jonathan Lemon wrote:
> > > I would like anyone who has a fxp card which doesn't work with
> > >the current driver to contact me in order to test out an alternate
>
I just did a cvs of src-all this morning, remade the world and am trying to compile a
new
kernel. I am able to make depend, but I just tried to do the make and got the following
errors
cc -c -O -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-prototype
s -Wpointer-arith
Okay I solved my kernel compile problem.
In /usr/src/sys/netinet/tcp_usrreq.c
I commented out lines 420 to 423 and lines 438 to 441
I noticed this was a change from a FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE machine that i looked at a couple
minutes ago. Here are lines 412 to 446 of the above mentioned file with the
CC="gcc -O6 -fomit-frame-pointer" OPTIM="-O2 -DBUFFERED_LOGS"
could some c guru tell me if this would be bad to use to an apache
optimization? I need to compile apache on my own not with ports
looking at makefile
in apache13 in ports collection i see these optimization flags.
along with --m
Hi,
I am trying to find out where the function socket() is actually defined.
I did a search on the sources and i kind of could not locate this
function. Also i could not find the code for the funcation bind()
connect() etc. I think i might be missing something here as i am
directly looking for a f
> I am trying to find out where the function socket() is actually defined.
sys/kern/uipc_syscalls.c
cscope is your friend.
> Moreover is see __P with all the function prototypes. Can anyone
> tell me what do they mean. I am right now assuming for my work that
> they just mean blank.
Bad assump
Try breaking up emails into paragraph sized individual questions. :)
* Shankar Agarwal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010312 16:57] wrote:
> Hi,
> I am trying to find out where the function socket() is actually defined.
> I did a search on the sources and i kind of could not locate this
> function.
If you
Hi John,
Thanks a lot for this fast reply. One more quick question i don't see
any function socket(int,int,int) in uipc_syscalls.c though i see
sys_socket function in this file. From what i understand socket libraby
function should call trap which should call syscall function which in
turn should
Could I get somebody to please commit this patch? It makes the doc
project treat PREFIX/LOCALBASE the same way the ports do, so that the
makefiles actually *work* if you don't have LOCALBASE set to /usr/local.
http://www.mired.org/home/mwm/
Independent WWW/Perforce/F
Hi Alfred,
I took your advice and did a search for the function socket, bind
,connect but i did not get any thing file which contains the code for
this functions. So i am still stuck in the same place.
Thanks
Regards
Shankar
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> Try breaking up emails into paragraph sized
> Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> >
> > Try breaking up emails into paragraph sized individual questions. :)
> >
> > * Shankar Agarwal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010312 16:57] wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > I am trying to find out where the function socket() is actually defined.
> > > I did a search on the sources
On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, Dan Phoenix wrote:
> CC="gcc -O6 -fomit-frame-pointer" OPTIM="-O2 -DBUFFERED_LOGS"
>
> could some c guru tell me if this would be bad to use to an apache
> optimization? I need to compile apache on my own not with ports
> looking at makefile
> in apache13 in ports collect
Hello -hackers
Right now, if you try to detach an md device that's currently mounted,
you will get a panic (maybe not immedietely, but it will come, esp. if
you ever try to use that mountpoint again). I'm pretty sure this is a
known problem, with the solution--or workaround--being, "then don't d
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 05:24:14PM -0500, Elliott Perrin wrote:
> I just did a cvs of src-all this morning, remade the world and am trying to compile
>a new
> kernel. I am able to make depend, but I just tried to do the make and got the
>following
> errors
>
> cc -c -O -Wall -Wredundant-decls
37 matches
Mail list logo
