Chuck Youse wrote:
> Whoa ... can anyone substantiate that this poor performance is typical
> or atypical of DPT SCSI RAID controllers?
This is atypical, however DPT HBAs are *very* touchy about termination
and cabling. For instance, with two identical (old) Seagate Hawks on
a SmartCache III, I g
Hi,
I encapsulated my data packet into the Ethernet packet,
set the source and destination Ethernet addresses, specified the frame
type (my own).
Now I want to send this packet into the Ethernet network and
recieve it of destination computer.
Please, tell me how can i write/read the Ethernet packe
In
,
Doug Rabson wrote:
>It looks like __BETTER_BDE_NPXCW__ would mask OVF, DIV0 and INV which I
>think is a better default. Is there some reason other than inertia for not
>changing to __BETTER_BDE_NPXCW__?
The "official" reason that FreeBSD still defaults to unmasked FPEs is
that the Intel a
I've been doing a little thinking on the whole Proprietary vs. GPL vs. BSD
licensing issue. Stallman's wrong, Brett's wrong, Gates iswrong, hell
everyobody's wrong.
Now that I have your attention, let me continue. The biggest problem I
see with software today, as an admin (read, bridge betwe
Actually - this comes down to the argument of what the market will
bear, contract law, and the legal ramifications of bugs/problems.
You "bought" the software, and agreed to the license terms
when you opened the box, didn't you - Caveat Emptor.
As long as you keep buying it, people/companies wil
On Thu, 13 May 1999, Thomas David Rivers wrote:
:But -hackers isn't likely the place for this...
I sent a followup stating I sent it to hackers accidentally, was supposed
to go to chat...
Jamie Bowden
--
If we've got to fight over grep, sign me up. But boggle can go.
-Ted Faber (on H
At 10:43 AM 5/13/99 -0400, Jamie Bowden wrote:
>
>I've been doing a little thinking on the whole Proprietary vs. GPL vs. BSD
>licensing issue. Stallman's wrong, Brett's wrong, Gates iswrong, hell
>everyobody's wrong.
>
>Now that I have your attention, let me continue. The biggest problem I
>se
On Thu, 13 May 1999, G. Adam Stanislav wrote:
:At 10:44 13-05-1999 -0400, you wrote:
:>
:>Damnit, I sent that last rant to the wrong list, it was supposed to go to
:>chat. Please direct all followups to chat.
:>
:>Jamie Bowden
:
:Yeah, but you slipped your finger on this one. You Cc'd it to hakce
On Mon, May 03, 1999 at 07:18:07PM -0700, Amancio Hasty wrote:
>
>HI Randall,
>
>Can you ask Roger to "ifdef" out the icbus stuff in the bt848 driver if an
>icbus
>application really needs the device then they can compile in the icbus code
>in the bt848 driver for 99.999 percent of the bt848 users
I was wondering if any adventurous individual has looked into writing a
driver for the MB86950 ethernet controller. I have quite a few cards
that use this chip and would be more than willing to acid-test the
driver. (Ever got 1MB/s over coax? :-))
--
Kris Kirby
Home UAH CS
WWW
---
On Tue, 11-May-1999 at 11:50:04 -0700, Ted Faber wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
>
> Bill Fumerola wrote:
> >How often do I see a author make a program and release _one_ FreeBSD
> >binary and about 5 different binaries depending on what linux libc format
> >you have.
>
> On a rela
The issue is that iic/smbus stuff makes unwarrently complex to
configure the bt848 driver .
--
Amancio Hasty
ha...@star-gate.com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
On Mon, May 10, 1999 at 08:10:32PM -0700, Amancio Hasty wrote:
> xls and xml are markup languages which means you need an
> "engine" to render -- they do solve very nicely the document
> construct , or grammar and syntax.
Not strictly true. Although given the all the misinformed press hype
about
The anti-spamer is a PITA. One more time.
BTW, I'll be at BAFUG tonight.
Jessem.
---
BUDS Coming to you soon.
BUDS (BSD Unix Distributed Simple-ly)
1999-05-13
The Digital Marshalls[4] are proud to annouce the the coming of a
new shared resoure for the F
On Thursday, 13 May 1999 at 10:02:36 +0100, Andrew Doran wrote:
> Chuck Youse wrote:
>
>> Whoa ... can anyone substantiate that this poor performance is typical
>> or atypical of DPT SCSI RAID controllers?
>
> This is atypical,
What's typical? Have you (or anybody else) done any measurements?
I'
[trimming other mailing lists]
On Thursday, 13 May 1999 at 13:32:42 +0400, Pavel V. Antipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I encapsulated my data packet into the Ethernet packet,
> set the source and destination Ethernet addresses, specified the frame
> type (my own).
> Now I want to send this packet into the E
On Thu, 13 May 1999, Nik Clayton wrote:
> Your XML aware web browser could then also read in these ATLL files and
> do something useful with them too, *without you needing to convert them
> to HTML first*. This is where the XML Style Language (XSL) comes in.
>
> XML is really SGML-lite. Most of
Hi All,
What is the best way to ensure that compilation of an IOCTL packet structure
in both a driver and an application will generate the same offsets to
structure members.
Thanks,
Stan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the m
Even though its for linux, and linux is really a different animal,
has anyone who is interested in realtime stuff looked at
http://www.rtlinux.org
they have a whack of patches against 2.0.36 and 2.2.1.
--
Email: ska...@worldgate.com Voice: +780 413 1910Fax: +780 421 4929
you need to look at the bpf interface
(man bpf)
julian
On Thu, 13 May 1999, Pavel V. Antipov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I encapsulated my data packet into the Ethernet packet,
> set the source and destination Ethernet addresses, specified the frame
> type (my own).
> Now I want to send this packet into
On 13-May-99 Pavel V. Antipov wrote:
> I encapsulated my data packet into the Ethernet packet,
> set the source and destination Ethernet addresses, specified the frame
> type (my own).
> Now I want to send this packet into the Ethernet network and
> recieve it of destination computer.
> Plea
Last try. If you get this three times in the hackers list
please trim.
Thanks Jessem.
-
BUDS Coming to you soon.
BUDS (BSD Unix Distributed Simple-ly)
1999-05-13
The Digital Marshalls[4] are proud to annouce the the coming of a
new s
I don't subscribe.. so if you guys are already talking about this.. then
disregard the message. Sun claims to now be able to run unmodified linux
binaries using an Open Source program. I know freebsd's is supposed to be
the greatest at this, but some of you may want to just review the Sun code.
I've been having some problems with my Cable Internet provider and
in the course of diagnosing them I've noticed what I think is a
bug in 3.1R.
As usual, some moron was flooding the local subnet with broadcast
pings. To my horror though, I could see that my 3.1R kernel was
actually answering them
VOP_LEASE(...) always returns 0 so there is no actual need to check its
return value. But still it has a return value. So should we use
(void)VOP_LEASE(...) instead of just VOP_LEASE(...)?
BTW, I guess that the practice of modifying
default_vnodeop_p[VOFFSET(vop_lease)] in nfs_init() is a hack.
:VOP_LEASE(...) always returns 0 so there is no actual need to check its
:return value. But still it has a return value. So should we use
:(void)VOP_LEASE(...) instead of just VOP_LEASE(...)?
I think we should leave it an int. It may not always return 0 in the
future.
:BTW, I guess tha
26 matches
Mail list logo
