On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Bernd Walter wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 04:52:15PM -0400, Mark Saad wrote:
>> Hackers
>> I have a strange apache issue , and I wonder if anyone has seen this before.
>> I am running Apache 1.3.34 on freeBSD 7.3-RELEASE amd64 . At som
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 04:52:15PM -0400, Mark Saad wrote:
> Hackers
> I have a strange apache issue , and I wonder if anyone has seen this before.
> I am running Apache 1.3.34 on freeBSD 7.3-RELEASE amd64 . At some
> point in the day apache's children segfault and die.
Hackers
I have a strange apache issue , and I wonder if anyone has seen this before.
I am running Apache 1.3.34 on freeBSD 7.3-RELEASE amd64 . At some
point in the day apache's children segfault and die. No core files are
generated. I am
not running mod_php either.
1. I have setup the foll
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 23:12:57 +0100
"Michael Vaughn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am contacting -performance, -questions, and -hackers in the hope someone
> helps me troubleshoot a problem with FreeBSD 6.2 and apache 2.2.4
>
Try t
Hello everyone,
I am contacting -performance, -questions, and -hackers in the hope someone
helps me troubleshoot a problem with FreeBSD 6.2 and apache 2.2.4
uname:
FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE Fri Jun 22 12:17:03 UTC 2007 amd64
installed php modules:
php5-5.2.3 PHP Scripting Language (Apache Module and
Bartosz Giza wrote:
> Hi,
>
> from couple of days i am trying to figure out what is wrong with apache
> bench. I want to test my remote site with it but all the time i got this
> error message.
>
> % ab -c 10 -n 500 http://x/test.php
> Test aborted after 10 failure
On 2006.12.30 21:10:50 +0100, Bartosz Giza wrote:
> from couple of days i am trying to figure out what is wrong with apache
> bench. I want to test my remote site with it but all the time i got this
> error message.
>
> % ab -c 10 -n 500 http://x/test.php
> Test aborted
Hi,
from couple of days i am trying to figure out what is wrong with apache
bench. I want to test my remote site with it but all the time i got this
error message.
% ab -c 10 -n 500 http://x/test.php
Test aborted after 10 failures
apr_socket_connect(): Operation already in progress (37
Hi everybody!
I have installed Apache 1.3+SSL and after troubling with the FreeBSD
NIC interface I have succeeded in having the server work.
Now I have another problem: the server works locally on the LAN, but
when I try to connect via WAN, noone is able to connect. In the access
Hi!
I made it! It was simple. I have added an alias with the public IP
address in the NIC configuration.
Sorry for having trobuled with my lack of experience ^_^
Thanks.
Mauro Bisiani
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://list
On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 09:51:48AM +0200, Mauro Bisiani wrote:
> I have recentrly installed Apache 1.3+SSL from the port collection.
> When it run locally everything is ok. But when I try to bind my public
> IP I get the following error message in the apache log file:
>
&g
Hi everybody,
I have recentrly installed Apache 1.3+SSL from the port collection.
When it run locally everything is ok. But when I try to bind my public
IP I get the following error message in the apache log file:
[crit] (49) Can't assign requested address: make_sock: could not
John Von Essen wrote:
> Doug,
>
> Did some googling and I did find a connection between excessive
> CLOSED_WAITS, and hanging apache, and webbots. Some of the IP's I saw in
> my netstat were bots too. The problem has something to do with the bot
> no longer acceptin
Doug,
Did some googling and I did find a connection between excessive
CLOSED_WAITS, and hanging apache, and webbots. Some of the IP's I saw in
my netstat were bots too. The problem has something to do with the bot no
longer accepting data, but apache will continue to send it back sinc
John Von Essen wrote:
> Had a little crash today, that appears to be apache related, but is
> confusing nonetheless.
>
> My server hosts a fair amount of websites, but nothing crazy. Uptime is
> usually only 0.5. Anyway, it got real slow, when I finally logged in,
> uptime was 1
Had a little crash today, that appears to be apache related, but is
confusing nonetheless.
My server hosts a fair amount of websites, but nothing crazy. Uptime is
usually only 0.5. Anyway, it got real slow, when I finally logged in,
uptime was 152, ps -aux showed alot of apache pids, over a
On Thu, 22 Jun 2006, Steven Hartland wrote:
We've just had a box which was subjected to a large amount of small apache
requests once this subsided the response of apache was still very slow. Many
seconds between requests showing in tcpdump and response being returned.
Upon investigati
We've just had a box which was subjected to a
large amount of small apache requests once this
subsided the response of apache was still very
slow. Many seconds between requests showing
in tcpdump and response being returned.
Upon investigation it seemed the number of
sockets in teardown /
Hello list,
I am configuring a very heavily used apache webserver, that required
some special needs.
This particular configuration needs to have at least 1024 httpds always
running. Reaching this number is not a problem, but whenever I stop
apache via apachectl stop, I notice all the httpds
OS is an Elegant Windows Mimic
** Armoring Apache HTTP Server with SSL
** Building RAD Forms and Menus in Mozilla
** O/S News from DevX
** Read the DevX Special Report: Java/.NET Interoperability
** Download Oracle Sample Code
** Take the WebLogic Platform 8.1 Online Trial
** Software Lifecycle
> Yeah; this whole thread is premised on working around the
> problem without an Apache software change. It's a reasonable
> premise (IMO) -- if you've got a custom compilation and a lot
> of modules, that can end up being a lot of software. I build
> a PHP4+SSL+Apa
;it believes it is talking to an HTTP 1.1 server", yes?
Yes.
> I guess using HTTP 1.0 is a better solution then. Of course, maybe the
> *best* solution IMVHO would be to upgrade to the Apache version without
> this bug.
Yeah; this whole thread is premised on working around the
proble
On Sun, 23 Jun 2002 02:06:20 -0700
Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joshua Lee wrote:
> > Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > The way you would deal with this would be to tell Apache that it
> > > was an HTTP 1.0 server, since chunkin
Joshua Lee wrote:
> Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Patrick Thomas wrote:
> > > Is it possible to patch/recompile FreeBSD 4.5 in such a way that your
> > > system is no longer vulnerable to the "chunking" attack, even if you are
> >
rable to the "chunking" attack, even if you are
> > > still running a vulnerable apache ?
> >
> > Not FreeBSD, but it's possible to reconfigure Apache.
> >
> > The way you would deal with this would be to tell Apache that it
> > was an HTTP 1.
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002 19:59:20 -0700
Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Patrick Thomas wrote:
> > Is it possible to patch/recompile FreeBSD 4.5 in such a way that your
> > system is no longer vulnerable to the "chunking" attack, even if you are
> &
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
>THat's not the issue. The issue is that some servers claim to be
>1.1 servers, but do not implement pipelining. Older Apache servers
>fall into this category.
I have been using pipelining in Mozilla for many months now without
encount
me servers"
> maybe it doesn't... Luckily it's not on by default.
THat's not the issue. The issue is that some servers claim to be
1.1 servers, but do not implement pipelining. Older Apache servers
fall into this category.
-- Terry
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002 10:38:21 +0200
Bernd Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 02:29:30AM -0400, Joshua Lee wrote:
> > On Thu, 20 Jun 2002 19:59:20 -0700
> > Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > The way you would deal with
What none of you has mentioned is the thought I had in mind when I asked
this question, and that is, I have a r&d machine with 16 jails on it, each
running apache.
Therefore in a situation like this it would be _much_ easier to just tune
a sysctl or rebuild the kernel, vs. rebuildin
Brandon D. Valentine wrote:
> However, I would ask Frank if there's a particular reason he needs to
> use Covalent Raven SSL. OpenSSL is free, works like gangbusters, and
> comes with FreeBSD. I have a feeling he'd be much happier with it if
> there's not some other reason he cannot move to it.
Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 07:33:54PM -0700, Frank Mayhar wrote:
> > Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > Surely it's easier to just upgrade the apache port, instead of
> > > recompiling your kernel and the entire OS.
> > Not always. (I'm r
; system is no longer vulnerable to the "chunking" attack, even if you are
> > > still running a vulnerable apache ?
>
> Why not upgrade Apache...?? Both the 1 and 2 series have been updated I think. (I'm
>a newbie at server stuff, so bear with me if I made a faux
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 07:33:54PM -0700, Frank Mayhar wrote:
> > Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > Surely it's easier to just upgrade the apache port, instead of
> > > recompiling your kernel and the entire OS.
> >
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 07:33:54PM -0700, Frank Mayhar wrote:
>> Kris Kennaway wrote:
>> > Surely it's easier to just upgrade the apache port, instead of
>> > recompiling your kernel and the entire OS.
>>
>>
Joshua Lee wrote:
> > The way you would deal with this would be to tell Apache that it
> > was an HTTP 1.0 server, since chunking is an HTTP 1.1 feature.
> >
> > The only place this is an issue is if you need to reuse an HTTP
> > connection, and that only occurs
On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 07:33:54PM -0700, Frank Mayhar wrote:
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > Surely it's easier to just upgrade the apache port, instead of
> > recompiling your kernel and the entire OS.
>
> Not always. (I'm running an old version of Covalent Raven
I think that libsafe would "protect" against this bug to at least prevent
against any possible malicious code execution. I think it still leaves
the DoS possibility open though... Even some kind of non-exec stack
protection patched into FBSD would only generate a SEGV if it got
triggered[*]. V
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002 19:59:20 -0700
Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Patrick Thomas wrote:
> > Is it possible to patch/recompile FreeBSD 4.5 in such a way that your
> > system is no longer vulnerable to the "chunking" attack, even if you are
> > sti
Patrick Thomas wrote:
> Is it possible to patch/recompile FreeBSD 4.5 in such a way that your
> system is no longer vulnerable to the "chunking" attack, even if you are
> still running a vulnerable apache ?
Not FreeBSD, but it's possible to reconfigure Apache.
The way
Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Surely it's easier to just upgrade the apache port, instead of
> recompiling your kernel and the entire OS.
Not always. (I'm running an old version of Covalent Raven SSL and I'm
loathe to upgrade. "If it works, don't fix it" and t
On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 02:17:41PM -0700, Patrick Thomas wrote:
>
> Is it possible to patch/recompile FreeBSD 4.5 in such a way that your
> system is no longer vulnerable to the "chunking" attack, even if you are
> still running a vulnerable apache ?
Surely it's
Is it possible to patch/recompile FreeBSD 4.5 in such a way that your
system is no longer vulnerable to the "chunking" attack, even if you are
still running a vulnerable apache ?
I ask because I see in one of the chunking exploits that:
* Remote OpenBSD/Apache exploit for the
Dan writes:
>
> I will give it a try.
> touch /var/account/acct
> accton
>
> how long does it take for anything to get written to that file?
>
> As far as fork storms, I did noticed 1. I had the junior admin write
> a script to restart apache if LA got to hi
I will give it a try.
touch /var/account/acct
accton
how long does it take for anything to get written to that file?
As far as fork storms, I did noticed 1. I had the junior admin write
a script to restart apache if LA got to high doing a truss on the pid
i did noticed mad processes and
has gone in.
>
> I'll have to do some more research but I guess this is comming down to
> more of catching the offending apache process then watching vmstat for
> page in and page outs happening.I would say it's fairly obvious that
> that is happening before it hits
> Yeah that is what I am thinking to. My guess is some large array allocated
> in the php code maybe or a sql query taking to long to finish eating up
> all the ram. That is kind of interesting to know.
you said that the CPU usage spikes also at the time of the memory depletion?
I wonder if y
numbers in the swap space, or like you said the system just
has decided to leave it there once it has gone in.
I'll have to do some more research but I guess this is comming down to
more of catching the offending apache process then watching vmstat for
page in and page outs happening.I woul
Once a page gets backed into swap backstore, it will remain until the
application exits. The page may be brought back to physical memory
and be used from physical memory. It was decided back in the early
days that it was not worth the effort to remove the page from backstore
until the program exit
On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, Dan wrote:
:
:i am seeing problems where apache is running into swap at times.
:When all is said and done...i see alot of available memory from top
:and alot still stuck in swap. Restarting apache at that point clears the
:swap space right out and memory is used properly
Hello Dan,
have you tried tuning apache's MaxRequestsPerChild Value ?
Although it doesn't seem to be a memory leak, tweaking
this value causes old apache threads to be closed.
Maybe you can try this and report the results.
--
Mit freundlichen Gruessen,
Marco Wertejuk - mwcis.co
i am seeing problems where apache is running into swap at times.
When all is said and done...i see alot of available memory from top
and alot still stuck in swap. Restarting apache at that point clears the
swap space right out and memory is used properly again.
These seem to be short bursting
Julian Elischer wrote:
> Who is the expert on apache, modules and shlibs?
> (I'll go offline to discuss the problem if I can find
> an appropriate person.. (can't get ldap module to work with apache
> under freebsd.)
Build Apache from your own sources, and not from ports.
Who is the expert on apache, modules and shlibs?
(I'll go offline to discuss the problem if I can find
an appropriate person.. (can't get ldap module to work with apache
under freebsd.)
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers"
>
> To: Dan Phoenix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: apache nfs hangs
>
> * Dan Phoenix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010420 15:12] wrote:
> >
> > 78662 cvs-4 0 10132K52K nfsvin 0:09 0.00% 0.00% httpd
> > 8399
pd
>
> here is an example from top.
>
> killall httpd won;t even work when it is in this state.
> Nfs could have hung for many reasons prob cause i was beating on nfs
> todaybut regardless ideas to improve apache to timeout apache
> in this state?
What are your mount o
state.
Nfs could have hung for many reasons prob cause i was beating on nfs
todaybut regardless ideas to improve apache to timeout apache
in this state?
--
Dan
+--+
| BRAVENET WEB SERVICES
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> > We haven't applied wakeup_one() to select() yet? (I think I've argued
> > about this before.)
> >
> > Someone get cracking! :)
>
> I'm not sure it's possible without redesigning the way select works.
>
Perhaps its not possible, as I'm not very familiar with the way k
hmmm i made all website files owned by apache owner and all was normal!
i told apc not to write to my webfiles yet it does anyways.
Anyone see anything fishy going on here?
On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, Dan Phoenix wrote:
> Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 14:25:46 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Dan Phoenix &
, Dan Phoenix wrote:
> Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 14:21:25 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Dan Phoenix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: apc and apache
>
>
> ;
> ; APC ;
> ;
>
> apc.cachedir="/usr/cache&q
;
; APC ;
;
apc.cachedir="/usr/cache"
apc.relative_includes= 1
apc.check_mtime = 1
threw that in the php.ini file.
Started apache and booom webservers went to hell...each httpd taking
20 megs or more on a couple webservers. Anyone exper
On 11-Apr-01 Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * Doug White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010411 16:07] wrote:
>> On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>>
>> > Basically, when apache is listening on multiple IPs/ports it needs
>> > to select() on several filed
* Doug White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010411 16:07] wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> > Basically, when apache is listening on multiple IPs/ports it needs
> > to select() on several filedescriptors. The problem (under FreeBSD
> > at least)
On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> Basically, when apache is listening on multiple IPs/ports it needs
> to select() on several filedescriptors. The problem (under FreeBSD
> at least) is that whenever you have some process select()'ing on
> a descriptor and another
ED]>
> To: Dan Phoenix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: lockf in apache
>
> At a glance the following config should work. If apache is not in
> 'accept' then you've done something wrong.
>
>
> * Dan Phoenix <[EMAIL PR
At a glance the following config should work. If apache is not in
'accept' then you've done something wrong.
* Dan Phoenix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010410 15:01] wrote:
>
>
> Ok let's take this for example
>
> Listen 172.16.0.26:80
> Listen 172.1
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: lockf in apache
>
> * Dan Phoenix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010410 13:02] wrote:
> >
> >
> > show alot of that in top
> > occasioanallythink that could be from nfs timeouts
> > or just w
around the select() call on the accept'ing
socket.
Basically, when apache is listening on multiple IPs/ports it needs
to select() on several filedescriptors. The problem (under FreeBSD
at least) is that whenever you have some process select()'ing on
a descriptor and another process wants to d
show alot of that in top
occasioanallythink that could be from nfs timeouts
or just waiting on mysql connections to come back?
what are they generally from?
--
Dan
+--+
| BRAVENET WEB SERVICES |
|
Dan Phoenix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [...]
Try ktrace instead, it provides much more detailed information.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
* Dan Phoenix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010320 10:41] wrote:
>
> btw what is err#25 from?
man 2 intro
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
open("./semcache.inc",0,0666)ERR#2 'No such file or
directory'
open("/website/include/semcache.inc",0,0666) = 5 (0x5)
__getcwd(0xbfbf6b90,0x400) = 0 (0x0)
open(".",0,00) = 6 (0x6)
chdir(0xbfbf6744)
On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 03:12:41PM -0800, Alex Zepeda wrote:
> > Not untested -- but you should go grab a graduate text on compiler
> > optimizations and familiarize yourself with the complexity of the problem.
>
> Care to recommend any starting places. You've piqued my interest.
http://www.ama
On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 02:58:40AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> I won't even to there...
Well, the only reason I mentioned it.. was that the pgcc folks don't seem
to be too delusioned about the dangers. -ON (N > 2) is regarded as at
least possibly in danger of generating incorrect code.
> Not
On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 01:19:31AM -0800, Alex Zepeda wrote:
> However, even the pgcc web page describes -O2 as safe.
I won't even to there...
> Yes, scanning thru the ML leads me to believe some of these optimizations
> are pretty much untested. Which is kinda funny, since the ia32 bits are
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 12:51:19PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> Well... when you 'gzip -9' something, it just takes longer, it doesn't
> sometimes corrupt your data (afaik).
Hmm. gzip seems to be pretty good about those things. I guess it's one
of the few GNU programs to be that way. :^)
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 10:08:00AM -0800, Gordon Tetlow wrote:
> Actually, we did. Of course, our production stuff is still compiled with
> gcc 2.7.2.1. I think. Whatever the standard system compiler for
> FreeBSD-3.2 is. And that was at a time when the world was still compiled
> with -O2, wasn't
* Alex Zepeda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010313 12:25] wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 07:41:40AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
>
> > Where did you even get the idea "-O6" did *_ANYTHING_*?? Don't people
> > ever read the documentation anymore.
>
> Well, yes. But I think that with the pgcc patches
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 07:41:40AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> Where did you even get the idea "-O6" did *_ANYTHING_*?? Don't people
> ever read the documentation anymore.
Well, yes. But I think that with the pgcc patches floating around that do
use -ON N <= 9 or so.. people might get conf
On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Charles Randall wrote:
> From: David O'Brien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >2. The base, system C compiler is known to produce bad code with -O2.
> >We have been proclaiming this since as long as I have been with the
> >Project.
>
> Is this an issue with FreeBSD's gcc
From: David O'Brien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>2. The base, system C compiler is known to produce bad code with -O2.
>We have been proclaiming this since as long as I have been with the
>Project.
Is this an issue with FreeBSD's gcc's or gcc in general? If gcc in general,
are there open
On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 10:34:32PM -0800, Gordon Tetlow wrote:
> _ _
> __/\_____ (_) __ _ | |__ __/\__
> \/ / __| | | / _` | | '_ \\/
> /_ _\ \__ \ | | | (_| | | | | | /_ _\
>\/ |___
>
> _ _
> __/\_____ (_) __ _ | |__ __/\__
> \/ / __| | | / _` | | '_ \\/
> /_ _\ \__ \ | | | (_| | | | | | /_ _\
>\/ |___/ |_| \__, | |_| |_| \/
> |___/
>
>
:-)
>
>
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 10:34:32PM -0800, Gordon Tetlow wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, Dan Phoenix wrote:
>
> > CC="gcc -O6 -fomit-frame-pointer" OPTIM="-O2 -DBUFFERED_LOGS"
> >
> > could some c guru tell me if this would be bad to use to an apache
>
On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, Dan Phoenix wrote:
> CC="gcc -O6 -fomit-frame-pointer" OPTIM="-O2 -DBUFFERED_LOGS"
>
> could some c guru tell me if this would be bad to use to an apache
> optimization? I need to compile apache on my own not with ports
> looking
CC="gcc -O6 -fomit-frame-pointer" OPTIM="-O2 -DBUFFERED_LOGS"
could some c guru tell me if this would be bad to use to an apache
optimization? I need to compile apache on my own not with ports
looking at makefile
in apache13 in ports collection i see these optimizati
Dan Phoenix wrote:
>
> httpd in free(): warning: recursive call.
What FreeBSD/apache versions is this with? I've seen the same on
FreeBSD-3.4 and an older apache build from ports. Haven't (yet) seen it
under 4.2 and the latest apache from ports.
--
Lars Eggert &
I did not specify a lock directive in httpd.conf.
Default my httpd is in /usr/local/apache
i would assume lock file is going there which is an ide drive.
> Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 17:57:03 -0800 (PST)
> From: Doug White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Dan Phoenix <[EMAIL PROTEC
2001] [alert] Child 777 returned a Fatal error...
> Apache is exiting!
> httpd in free(): warning: page is already free.
>
>
> anyone seen this before?
> i do have some things on nfs apache accesses..
Don't put the scoreboard & lock file on NFS. The Apache docs say this i
width limit 219/200 pps
icmp-response bandwidth limit 219/200 pps
icmp-response bandwidth limit 221/200 pps
I even recompiled his kernel optimized with 256 maxusers.
That did not help either.
looking at apache error log i see alot of
[Mon Feb 26 15:12:50 2001] [error] (54)Connection reset by
peer: g
call.
:
:seeing that on 2 webservers that have highest cpu
:yet others are exactly the same with really low cpu's
This occurs if a signal occurs in the middle of a free() and
the signal handler itself tries to do a free(). It is extremely
illegal to do this... apache needs to be
.
seeing that on 2 webservers that have highest cpu
yet others are exactly the same with really low cpu's
On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, Dan Phoenix wrote:
> Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 13:07:40 -0800 (PST)
> From: Dan Phoenix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: apache
[Mon Feb 26 13:04:34 2001] [error] (54)Connection reset by
peer: getsockname
[Mon Feb 26 13:04:39 2001] [emerg] (9)Bad file
descriptor: flock: LOCK_EX: Error getting accept lock. Exiting!
[Mon Feb 26 13:04:39 2001] [alert] Child 777 returned a Fatal error...
Apache is exiting!
httpd in free
Ok i fixed itnfsbufs or something and maxusers i increased
solved this problem.
On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Daniel Hagan wrote:
> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 16:50:43 -0500
> From: Daniel Hagan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Dan Phoenix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ya i checked that out already. netstat -m seems fine.
What I am trying to do is move apache off this linux box
to a freebsd one to split up the load. I leave mysql on linux box for
the SMP.
currently I have it moved back to linux box till I can fix this error.
Here are some error logs from
t; ftp: socket: No buffer space available
> ftp> ls
> 425 Can't open passive connection: No buffer space available.
> Passive mode refused.
> ftp>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2001 17:44:55 -0800 (PST)
> From: Dan Phoenix <[EMAIL
ace available
ftp> ls
425 Can't open passive connection: No buffer space available.
Passive mode refused.
ftp>
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2001 17:44:55 -0800 (PST)
From: Dan Phoenix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: apache PMAP_SHPGPERPRO
[ my one and only post to hackers(bcc:'d) on this thread ]
On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 04:07:35PM -0800, Dan Phoenix wrote:
>
>
> Ya, ok let;s stop this childish game already...stupid of me
> to stoop to his level.
> I appologise formally to anyone that took offence.
The administration of irc.fre
t;
> To: Dan Phoenix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: Bill Fumerola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mathew KANNER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: APACHE PROBLEMS (fwd)
>
> > I don;t know if I will be on this list anymore after reporting the abuse
>
> I don;t know if I will be on this list anymore after reporting the abuse
> Bill Fumerola has done as he works for freebsd.orgif i am now removed
> from this list please cc me any thing he says about me ...thankyou.
1. Bill Fumerola does not "work" for FreeBSD.org in the sense that he
rep
1 - 100 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
