On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 01:54:46PM -0500, Nathan Vidican wrote:
>
> Take this idea, and run with it... build a package that installs over
> the base installation, bundling the LDAP client libs, new rc structure,
> tools, etc all in one shot. Add it to the ports collection and call it
> done.
I
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nathan Vidican
> Sent: Friday, 12 January 2007 5:55 AM
> To: Mike Meyer; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: LDAP integration
>
> Mike Meyer wrote:
> > In <[EMAIL PRO
Mike Meyer wrote:
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Vulpes Velox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
LDAP is nice organizing across many systems, but if you are just
dealing with one computer it is complete over kill for any thing.
In that situation, it's not merely overkill, it's may actually be a
bad i
On Thursday 11 January 2007 09:56 am, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
> Mike Meyer wrote:
> > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Vulpes Velox
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
> >> LDAP is nice organizing across many systems, but if you are just
> >> dealing with one computer it is complete over kill for any thing.
> >
> > I
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Lamont Granquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
>
> On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Mike Meyer wrote:
> > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Vulpes Velox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
> >> LDAP is nice organizing across many systems, but if you are just
> >> dealing with one computer it is complete ove
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Vulpes Velox wrote:
I vote both are completely stupid. LDAP is nice organizing across
many systems, but if you are just dealing with one computer it is
complete over kill for any thing. Splitting rc.conf up into
multiple files is just plain messy and stupid as well. I can s
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Mike Meyer wrote:
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Vulpes Velox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
LDAP is nice organizing across many systems, but if you are just
dealing with one computer it is complete over kill for any thing.
In that situation, it's not merely overkill, it's may actu
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Doug Barton wrote:
Lamont Granquist wrote:
If i understand that correctly its not *exactly* what i was looking for,
but its better than a monolithic /etc/rc.conf
It looks like you must put /etc/rc.d/inetd config into either
/etc/rc.conf or /etc/rc.config.d/inetd.
Actual
Lamont Granquist wrote:
>
> On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Doug Barton wrote:
>> It's not documented, but the code is there in /etc/rc.subr:
>>
>> grep 'rc.conf\.d' /etc/rc.subr
>>if [ -f /etc/rc.conf.d/"$_name" ]; then
>>debug "Sourcing /etc/rc.conf.d/${_name}"
>>.
Mike Meyer wrote:
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Vulpes Velox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
LDAP is nice organizing across many systems, but if you are just
dealing with one computer it is complete over kill for any thing.
In that situation, it's not merely overkill, it's may actually be a
bad idea. Can
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Vulpes Velox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
> LDAP is nice organizing across many systems, but if you are just
> dealing with one computer it is complete over kill for any thing.
In that situation, it's not merely overkill, it's may actually be a
bad idea. Can you say "AIX SDR"
Vulpes Velox wrote:
I vote both are completely stupid. LDAP is nice organizing across
many systems, but if you are just dealing with one computer it is
complete over kill for any thing. Splitting rc.conf up into
multiple files is just plain messy and stupid as well. I can see
there being times wh
On Wed, January 10, 2007 2:43 pm, Lamont Granquist wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Doug Barton wrote:
>> Lamont Granquist wrote:
>>> On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Doug Barton wrote:
> And if you're looking specifically at the /etc/rc.conf config
> file, what would be more useful would be an /etc/rc.co
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 18:41:47 +1100
David Nugent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Freddie Cash wrote:
> > To each their own, of course. Personally, I am so sick of the way
> > system like Debian use dozens of config files for each app, all in
> > their own conf.d/ sub-directories. Some apps, like Pur
Freddie Cash wrote:
To each their own, of course. Personally, I am so sick of the way
system like Debian use dozens of config files for each app, all in
their own conf.d/ sub-directories. Some apps, like PureFTPd actually
use separate config files for each and every option it supports.
Trying t
On Wed, January 10, 2007 2:43 pm, Lamont Granquist wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Doug Barton wrote:
>> Lamont Granquist wrote:
>>> On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Doug Barton wrote:
> And if you're looking specifically at the /etc/rc.conf config
> file, what would be more useful would be an /etc/rc.co
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:10:36 -0800 (PST)
Lamont Granquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Vulpes Velox wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:56:23 -0800
> > Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Lamont Granquist wrote:
> >>> Why are you doing this in the FreeBSD rc script
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Vulpes Velox wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:56:23 -0800
Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Lamont Granquist wrote:
Why are you doing this in the FreeBSD rc scripts directly? Why
not install cfengine and work on making cfengine play better with
database-driven config?
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Vulpes Velox wrote:
And if you're looking specifically at the /etc/rc.conf config file,
what would be more useful would be an /etc/rc.conf.d/ directory.
That gets away from the need to tweak and edit the /etc/rc.conf
config file with multiple inputs tweaking a single file.
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 04:54:59PM -0600, Vulpes Velox wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:14:17 -0800
> Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Vulpes Velox wrote:
> >
> > > There will be no massive patch for it, given it involves little
> > > more than the inclusion of a single rc.d file and a
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:56:23 -0800
Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lamont Granquist wrote:
>
> > Why are you doing this in the FreeBSD rc scripts directly? Why
> > not install cfengine and work on making cfengine play better with
> > database-driven config?
>
> Indeed. For a "many syst
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 13:26:57 -0800 (PST)
Lamont Granquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, 9 Jan 2007, Vulpes Velox wrote:
> > The why is because I like centralized management and it would be
> > really handy for that. For my use, it would be handy in regards
> > to my laptops.
> >
>
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Doug Barton wrote:
Lamont Granquist wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Doug Barton wrote:
And if you're looking specifically at the /etc/rc.conf config file, what
would be more useful would be an /etc/rc.conf.d/ directory.
Good news for you, we already support that. :) I agree
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:14:17 -0800
Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Vulpes Velox wrote:
>
> > There will be no massive patch for it, given it involves little
> > more than the inclusion of a single rc.d file and a bit of
> > documentation.
>
> In that case, you'll be glad to know that th
Lamont Granquist wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Doug Barton wrote:
>>> And if you're looking specifically at the /etc/rc.conf config file, what
>>> would be more useful would be an /etc/rc.conf.d/ directory.
>>
>> Good news for you, we already support that. :) I agree that it makes a
>> great
Vulpes Velox wrote:
> There will be no massive patch for it, given it involves little more
> than the inclusion of a single rc.d file and a bit of documentation.
In that case, you'll be glad to know that the base in 6.x and newer
already supports running a local rc.d script in the overall rcorder
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Doug Barton wrote:
Lamont Granquist wrote:
Why are you doing this in the FreeBSD rc scripts directly? Why not
install cfengine and work on making cfengine play better with
database-driven config?
Indeed. For a "many systems" problem, cfengine is a great tool. I
think t
Lamont Granquist wrote:
> Why are you doing this in the FreeBSD rc scripts directly? Why not
> install cfengine and work on making cfengine play better with
> database-driven config?
Indeed. For a "many systems" problem, cfengine is a great tool. I
think the OP is more interested in the "dynamic
On Tue, 9 Jan 2007, Vulpes Velox wrote:
The why is because I like centralized management and it would be
really handy for that. For my use, it would be handy in regards to my
laptops.
I feel better central management is extreme significant. If I had
nothing more to say than "this would be nea
On Tue, 09 Jan 2007 13:23:29 -0800
Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Vulpes Velox wrote:
> > On Sun, 07 Jan 2007 22:02:30 -0800
> > Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Vulpes Velox wrote:
> >>> I was just wondering. How many people here have given lots of
> >>> though about int
Vulpes Velox wrote:
> On Sun, 07 Jan 2007 22:02:30 -0800
> Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Vulpes Velox wrote:
>>> I was just wondering. How many people here have given lots of
>>> though about integrating FreeBSD configuration with LDAP. I've
>>> just begun looking at it a lot more an
- Original Message -
From: "Alexander Leidinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Vulpes Velox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: ; "Doug Barton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 10:19 AM
Subject: Re: LDAP integration
Quoting Vulpes Velox
Quoting Vulpes Velox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Mon, 8 Jan 2007
18:52:47 -0600):
On Sun, 07 Jan 2007 22:02:30 -0800
Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Vulpes Velox wrote:
> I was just wondering. How many people here have given lots of
> though about integrating FreeBSD configuration with
On Monday 08 January 2007 11:36, Vulpes Velox wrote:
> I was just wondering. How many people here have given lots of though
> about integrating FreeBSD configuration with LDAP. I've just begun
> looking at it a lot more and was curious as to what other people
> think in this area.
I use OpenLDAP w
On Tue, 09 Jan 2007 09:22:31 +0200
Danny Braniss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, 07 Jan 2007 22:02:30 -0800
> > Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Vulpes Velox wrote:
> > > > I was just wondering. How many people here have given lots of
> > > > though about integrating FreeBS
> On Sun, 07 Jan 2007 22:02:30 -0800
> Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Vulpes Velox wrote:
> > > I was just wondering. How many people here have given lots of
> > > though about integrating FreeBSD configuration with LDAP. I've
> > > just begun looking at it a lot more and was curious
On Sun, 07 Jan 2007 22:02:30 -0800
Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Vulpes Velox wrote:
> > I was just wondering. How many people here have given lots of
> > though about integrating FreeBSD configuration with LDAP. I've
> > just begun looking at it a lot more and was curious as to what
>
On Mon, 8 Jan 2007 09:21:21 +0100
VANHULLEBUS Yvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 05:59:35PM -0600, Z.C.B. wrote:
> > I was just wondering. How many people here have given lots of
> > though about integrating FreeBSD configuration with LDAP. I've
> > just begun looking at it
Quoting Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Sun, 07 Jan 2007
22:02:30 -0800):
Vulpes Velox wrote:
I was just wondering. How many people here have given lots of though
about integrating FreeBSD configuration with LDAP. I've just begun
looking at it a lot more and was curious as to what other
On Mon, 8 Jan 2007, Dave Horsfall wrote:
> Out of all the O'Reilly books I have, the LDAP one was the most useless.
I forgot to say, "and out of all the LDAP books I have *as well*".
-- Dave
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.fre
On Mon, 8 Jan 2007, Tom Judge wrote:
> I would recommend the "LDAP System Administration" book published by
> O'Reilly.
I wouldn't, unless a recipe book is your style; there are better books
(which will have to wait until I get into work tomorrow).
Out of all the O'Reilly books I have, the LDA
VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote:
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 05:59:35PM -0600, Z.C.B. wrote:
I was just wondering. How many people here have given lots of though
about integrating FreeBSD configuration with LDAP. I've just begun
looking at it a lot more and was curious as to what other people
think in this a
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 05:59:35PM -0600, Z.C.B. wrote:
> I was just wondering. How many people here have given lots of though
> about integrating FreeBSD configuration with LDAP. I've just begun
> looking at it a lot more and was curious as to what other people
> think in this area.
Hi.
What do
Vulpes Velox wrote:
> I was just wondering. How many people here have given lots of though
> about integrating FreeBSD configuration with LDAP. I've just begun
> looking at it a lot more and was curious as to what other people
> think in this area.
It would be more useful to have this discussion i
44 matches
Mail list logo
