Re: UFS1 vs UFS2

2012-12-30 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 08:39:26PM +0100, Paul Schenkeveld wrote: > On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 02:21:26PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > OpenBSD by default use UFS1 for partitions smaller than 1TB. > > > > FreeBSD use always UFS2. UFS2 uses double the amount of space for inodes. > > basic operati

Re: UFS1 vs UFS2

2012-12-30 Thread Paul Schenkeveld
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 09:29:27PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > > > I don't think performance will be much different but if so, UFS1 would > > be (sightly) faster than UFS2 because one page read will get more inodes > > from disk and 32 bit (UFS1) arithmetic may be slightly faster than 64 bit

Re: UFS1 vs UFS2

2012-12-30 Thread Wojciech Puchar
I don't think performance will be much different but if so, UFS1 would be (sightly) faster than UFS2 because one page read will get more inodes from disk and 32 bit (UFS1) arithmetic may be slightly faster than 64 bit (UFS2). thanks for answer i was looking for! i will rebuild FS to UFS1, savin

Re: UFS1 vs UFS2

2012-12-30 Thread Paul Schenkeveld
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 08:42:27PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > It makes perfect sense to use UFS1 on systems where space savings matter > > unless your application requires any of the new features that are not > > present in UFS1. > > > > Nanobsd(8) for example uses UFS1 by default too. > tha

Re: UFS1 vs UFS2

2012-12-30 Thread Wojciech Puchar
It makes perfect sense to use UFS1 on systems where space savings matter unless your application requires any of the new features that are not present in UFS1. Nanobsd(8) for example uses UFS1 by default too. thank you for answering. i don't need any new extra features, just plain filesystem on

RE: UFS1 vs UFS2

2012-12-30 Thread Wojciech Puchar
i chose with newfs as i don't use installer :) anyway - it is not an answer to the question. On Sun, 30 Dec 2012, Quentin SCHWERKOLT wrote: Since FreeBSD 9.0, you can choose between UFS1 and UFS2 in bsdinstall(8) when creating a new freebsd-ufs partition. Q. Schwerkolt Date: Sun, 30 Dec 20

Re: UFS1 vs UFS2

2012-12-30 Thread Paul Schenkeveld
On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 02:21:26PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > OpenBSD by default use UFS1 for partitions smaller than 1TB. > > FreeBSD use always UFS2. UFS2 uses double the amount of space for inodes. > basic operation seems the same. > > Does it make sense to use UFS1 for small filesystem

RE: UFS1 vs UFS2

2012-12-30 Thread Quentin SCHWERKOLT
Since FreeBSD 9.0, you can choose between UFS1 and UFS2 in bsdinstall(8) when creating a new freebsd-ufs partition. Q. Schwerkolt > Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 14:21:26 +0100 > From: woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl > To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org > Subject: UFS1 vs UFS2 > > OpenBSD by default use U