I don't think performance will be much different but if so, UFS1 would be (sightly) faster than UFS2 because one page read will get more inodes from disk and 32 bit (UFS1) arithmetic may be slightly faster than 64 bit (UFS2).
thanks for answer i was looking for! i will rebuild FS to UFS1, saving ca 1GB for inodes.
If performance is an issue, consider turning off atime updates or even mount the filesystem read-only if possible.
i always turn off atime and use softupdates. it cannot be readonly. _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
