It makes perfect sense to use UFS1 on systems where space savings matter
unless your application requires any of the new features that are not
present in UFS1.
Nanobsd(8) for example uses UFS1 by default too.
thank you for answering. i don't need any new extra features, just plain
filesystem on 60GB filesystem. But question is - will performance be the
same, slower or faster?
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
