On Fri, 4 Jan 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, have you considered procstat ? (as i read here:
http://ivoras.sharanet.org/freebsd/freebsd8.html it is destined to replace
procfs in a way, am I wrong ?)
Depending on how short term your application must be available (and how long
it will ta
Quoting Fernando Apesteguía <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Maybe a mix of both could be good: use the linxprocfs when it is
> almost straightforward (in fact I could run the app, just changing few
> lines) and sysctl when the linprocfs doesn't provide the information
> that I need.
And I just made a fool
Quoting Fernando Apesteguía <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Maybe a mix of both could be good: use the linxprocfs when it is
> almost straightforward (in fact I could run the app, just changing few
> lines) and sysctl when the linprocfs doesn't provide the information
> that I need.
Wouldn't the opposite
"Fernando Apesteguía" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > "Fernando Apesteguía" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I have an application written in C + Gtk + Glib that gathers
> > > information from procfs under Linux. Now, I'm trying to port this
> > >
On Jan 3, 2008 9:53 PM, Ivan Voras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fernando Apesteguía wrote:
>
> > Maybe a mix of both could be good: use the linxprocfs when it is
> > almost straightforward (in fact I could run the app, just changing few
> > lines) and sysctl when the linprocfs doesn't provide the i
Fernando Apesteguía wrote:
> Maybe a mix of both could be good: use the linxprocfs when it is
> almost straightforward (in fact I could run the app, just changing few
> lines) and sysctl when the linprocfs doesn't provide the information
> that I need.
Also, linprocfs is never mounted by default
On Jan 3, 2008 8:50 PM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Fernando Apesteguía" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I have an application written in C + Gtk + Glib that gathers
> > information from procfs under Linux. Now, I'm trying to port this
> > application to FreeBSD (I'm working w
"Fernando Apesteguía" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have an application written in C + Gtk + Glib that gathers
> information from procfs under Linux. Now, I'm trying to port this
> application to FreeBSD (I'm working with 7.0 RC1).
man linprocfs
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 06:26:21PM +0100, Fernando Apestegu?a wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I post my question in this list cause Ivan Voras ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> suggested that here I could find more help.
>
> I have an application written in C + Gtk + Glib that gathers
> information from procfs under Li
Hi all,
I post my question in this list cause Ivan Voras ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
suggested that here I could find more help.
I have an application written in C + Gtk + Glib that gathers
information from procfs under Linux. Now, I'm trying to port this
application to FreeBSD (I'm working with 7.0 RC1)
On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 05:16:42PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
> On 03/01/2008, Fernando Apesteguía <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Yes, that's my problem. In Linux I can get from /proc/cpuinfo for
> > example: name, model, stepping, cache size, clock speed, supported
> > extensions, etc...
> > But
On 03/01/2008, Fernando Apesteguía <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, that's my problem. In Linux I can get from /proc/cpuinfo for
> example: name, model, stepping, cache size, clock speed, supported
> extensions, etc...
> But using sysctl in FreeBSD (sysctl -a) I can only see name and vendor
> for
12 matches
Mail list logo
