Quoting Fernando Apesteguía <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Maybe a mix of both could be good: use the linxprocfs when it is > almost straightforward (in fact I could run the app, just changing few > lines) and sysctl when the linprocfs doesn't provide the information > that I need. Wouldn't the opposite be more legitimate: using sysctl and falling back on linuxprocfs when lacking functionality ? (Depending on whether it's a FreeBSD *port*, or if you want to keep it as general as you can) Also, have you considered procstat ? (as i read here: http://ivoras.sharanet.org/freebsd/freebsd8.html it is destined to replace procfs in a way, am I wrong ?) Depending on how short term your application must be available (and how long it will take to MFC procstat), it might do the thing. _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
