On Jan 3, 2008 9:53 PM, Ivan Voras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Fernando Apesteguía wrote: > > > Maybe a mix of both could be good: use the linxprocfs when it is > > almost straightforward (in fact I could run the app, just changing few > > lines) and sysctl when the linprocfs doesn't provide the information > > that I need. > > Also, linprocfs is never mounted by default - this might or might not be > an obstacle, depending on how user-friendly the application is (asking > desktop users to alter their fstabs may be asking too much :) ). >
I hadn't thought about it... but it's quite to the point. Maybe it makes no sense to ask for a particular filesystem from a graphical Gnome application... > > _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
