Re: ONTOPIC - FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT - Not a bunch of licence Jihad crap

2001-01-07 Thread Wes Peters
Jeremiah Gowdy wrote: > > > > Claiming that software isn't "free" because it's not valuable is > redefining > > > the word "free" to mean something that has no cost, yet has value. > > > > > > free (fr) adj. Costing nothing; gratuitous: > > > > Yeah, and 'gay' means 'joyful'. > > You're saying t

Re: ONTOPIC - FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT - Not a bunch of licence Jihad crap

2001-01-07 Thread Jeremiah Gowdy
> [ The dict command is your friend ] > > 1. Exempt from subjection to the will of others; not under > restraint, control, or compulsion; able to follow one's > own impulses, desires, or inclinations; determining one's > own course of action; not dependent; at liberty.

Re: ONTOPIC - FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT - Not a bunch of licence Jihad crap

2001-01-07 Thread Jeremiah Gowdy
> > Claiming that software isn't "free" because it's not valuable is redefining > > the word "free" to mean something that has no cost, yet has value. > > > > free (fr) adj. Costing nothing; gratuitous: > > Yeah, and 'gay' means 'joyful'. You're saying the most common definition of "free" isn't n

Re: ONTOPIC - FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT - Not a bunch of licence Jihad crap

2001-01-07 Thread Jonas Luster
-- 06/01/01 21:44 -0800 - Jeremiah Gowdy : > Claiming that software isn't "free" because it's not valuable is redefining > the word "free" to mean something that has no cost, yet has value. > > free (fr) adj. Costing nothing; gratuitous: Yeah, and 'gay' means 'joyful'. > The word has absolutel

Re: ONTOPIC - FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT - Not a bunch of licence Jihad crap

2001-01-06 Thread Jeremiah Gowdy
> What's so "free" about software that you don't pay money for? Pretty much > nothing compared to software that you are /free/ to modify and /free/ to use > any way you want is "free". There is very little of that for Windows > compared to for Unix in general. Okay, this levels of "free" concep

Re: ONTOPIC - FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT - Not a bunch of licence Jihad crap

2001-01-06 Thread Brian F. Feldman
"Jeremiah Gowdy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Uuuuh, I'm gonna have to agree with Murray that there is a complete > > dearth of free software for Windows. Go search shareware.com, or > > Tucows, or any of the other Windows-centric software sites, and just > > TRY to find most of the same tools

Re: ONTOPIC - FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT - Not a bunch of licence Jihad crap

2000-12-28 Thread Jeremiah Gowdy
> Uuuuh, I'm gonna have to agree with Murray that there is a complete > dearth of free software for Windows. Go search shareware.com, or > Tucows, or any of the other Windows-centric software sites, and just > TRY to find most of the same tools or applications you take for > granted on your Unix

Re: ONTOPIC - FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT - Not a bunch of licence Jihad crap

2000-12-28 Thread mouss
At 17:07 28/12/00 -0200, Rik van Riel wrote: >On Wed, 27 Dec 2000, Jeremiah Gowdy wrote: > > > If you slant your judgement so far against the other products, > > it makes you sound like you don't know what you're talking about > > (no offense). You need to point out the pros and cons of ALL > > t

Re: ONTOPIC - FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT - Not a bunch of licence Jihad crap

2000-12-27 Thread Jeremiah Gowdy
> The current work in progress is available at : > http://people.freebsd.org/~murray/ > Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. > > Thanks, > > - Murray Okay, I read your page and printed it out, and went over it a few times. A couple of things bothered me, but for the most par