Jeremiah Gowdy wrote: > > > > Claiming that software isn't "free" because it's not valuable is > redefining > > > the word "free" to mean something that has no cost, yet has value. > > > > > > free (fr) adj. Costing nothing; gratuitous: > > > > Yeah, and 'gay' means 'joyful'. > > You're saying the most common definition of "free" isn't no cost ? That would depend on whether you're talking to Libertarians or KMart Shoppers. Can we please take this off the hackers list? -- "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?" Wes Peters Softweyr LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://softweyr.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Wes Peters
- Re: ONTOPIC - FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, a... Jeremiah Gowdy
- Re: ONTOPIC - FreeBSD vs Linux, Solar... Chris Dillon
- Re: ONTOPIC - FreeBSD vs Linux, S... Jeremiah Gowdy
- Re: ONTOPIC - FreeBSD vs Linu... Brian F. Feldman
- Re: ONTOPIC - FreeBSD vs ... Jeremiah Gowdy
- Re: ONTOPIC - FreeBS... Ken Stox
- Re: ONTOPIC - Fr... Jeremiah Gowdy
- Re: ONTOPIC - FreeBS... Jonas Luster
- Re: ONTOPIC - Fr... Jeremiah Gowdy
- Re: ONTOPIC - Fr... Wes Peters
- Re: ONTOPIC - Fr... Rik van Riel
- Re: ONTOPIC - FreeBSD vs Linux, Solar... Rik van Riel
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Peter Mutsaers
- Software Patents. Was Re: FreeBSD vs... Julian Stacey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Software Patents. Was Re: Fr... Boris
- Software Patents. Was Re: FreeBS... Peter Mutsaers
- Re: Software Patents. Was Re:... Julian Stacey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Software Patents PILCH Hartmut
- Re: Software Patents Dan Langille