. The details are interesting:
In rfc2553, AI_ADDRCONFIG is described as:
- The AI_ADDRCONFIG flag specifies that a query for records
should occur only if the node has at least one IPv6 source
address configured and a query for A records should occur only
if the node has at
Hi,
I've been playing with the include-what-you-use[1] llvm tool for some on my
personnal projects, as it works very well, I have also played with it on our
source tree starting with the bin directory.
It shows some interesting results, while the default output is quite aggressive,
I just
Very interesting! Thanks
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> Just saw the link to a very interesting paper on SMP scalability.
> A very good read and highly relevant for our efforts as well. In
> certain areas we may already fare better, in others we still have
&g
Just saw the link to a very interesting paper on SMP scalability.
A very good read and highly relevant for our efforts as well. In
certain areas we may already fare better, in others we still have
some work to do.
An Analysis of Linux Scalability to many Cores
ABSTRACT
This paper analyzes the
Hi all.
I think I've probably mentioned dozens of times I've been working with
some other people to get FreeBSD working with Clang in the base system.
The LLVM people recently announced another project that may be
interesting for us, which should be usable with both GCC and Clang:
I've just read an interesting post about a new model accepted for
developing PostgreSQL, and I'm finding parallels in how their release
8.3 was delayed similar to our 7.0.
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-02/msg00193.php
I also see some possible reasons why it cou
On Jan 22, 9:15, Uwe Doering wrote:
} Subject: Re: Interesting TCP issue
} Steve Watt wrote:
} > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Julian Elischer wrote:
} >
} > [ Snip discussion of symptoms of window scaling broken when
} > talking to at least the skype mail servers. ]
} >
} >&
Steve Watt wrote:
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Julian Elischer wrote:
[ Snip discussion of symptoms of window scaling broken when
talking to at least the skype mail servers. ]
we have seen this since 4.x
I think a fix may be in 7.0 but I'm not sure..
I thin kthere is a problem when the far end sets
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Julian Elischer wrote:
[ Snip discussion of symptoms of window scaling broken when
talking to at least the skype mail servers. ]
>we have seen this since 4.x
>I think a fix may be in 7.0 but I'm not sure..
>I thin kthere is a problem when the far end sets the window down t
Steve Watt wrote:
On Jan 2, 0:06, Steve Watt wrote:
} Subject: Re: Interesting TCP issue
} On Jan 1, 23:56, Julian Elischer wrote:
} } Subject: Re: Interesting TCP issue
} } Steve Watt wrote:
} } > One of my users is having trouble receiving mail from Skype. So,
} } > after some sniff
On Jan 2, 0:06, Steve Watt wrote:
} Subject: Re: Interesting TCP issue
} On Jan 1, 23:56, Julian Elischer wrote:
} } Subject: Re: Interesting TCP issue
} } Steve Watt wrote:
} } > One of my users is having trouble receiving mail from Skype. So,
} } > after some sniffing, I discovere
b79 7065 2e6e 6574 0d0a kype.net..
And no responses from my system.
Interesting. I presume it has something to do with the
idiotically small window the remote server is advertising. So I
set net.inet.tcp.minmss down to 46, and that resulted in a RST
being spit back to skype'
On Jan 1, 23:56, Julian Elischer wrote:
} Subject: Re: Interesting TCP issue
} Steve Watt wrote:
} > One of my users is having trouble receiving mail from Skype. So,
} > after some sniffing, I discovered this:
} >
} > # tcpdump -vv -s 1500 -i dc0 -X net 213.244.128.0/18
} > tcpdum
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> From Steve Watt on Monday, January 01, 2007 4:37 PM
>>
>> # tcpdump -vv -s 1500 -i dc0 -X net 213.244.128.0/18
[ snip ]
>> Interesting. I presume it has something to do with the
>> idiotically small win
019 f2bc e212 4a6b fcff B]..Jk..
> 0x0020: 8018 002e 9297 0101 080a 95b8 5568 ..Uh
> 0x0030: 1eff 784a 4548 4c4f 2073 6861 7265 2e73 ..xJEHLO.share.s
> 0x0040: 6b79 7065 2e6e 6574 0d0a kype.net..
>
> Interesting. I presu
d0a kype.net..
And no responses from my system.
Interesting. I presume it has something to do with the
idiotically small window the remote server is advertising. So I
set net.inet.tcp.minmss down to 46, and that resulted in a RST
being spit back to skype's server when its re
I just noticed that my system hangs with sysinstall displaying
'Probing devices, this can take a while' as long as I have
the following card installed:
Jul 4 18:51:10 freebie /kernel: puc0: port
0x8800-0x880f,0x9000-0x9007,0x9400-0x9407,0x9800-0x9807,0xa000-0xa007,0xa400-0xa407
irq 5 at device
FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA
FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA
FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA
FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA
FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA
FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA
-
This email was sent
FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA
FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA
FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA
FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA
FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA
FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA
-
This email was sent
FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA
FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA
FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA
FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA
FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA
FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA
-
This email was sent
FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA
FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA
FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA
FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA
FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA
FUCK SCOTT LONG AND FUCK BILL FUMEROLA
-
This email was sent
Want
To Get A Lot Of Target Email
Addresses Right Now?
We can help you! Our services were developed for enterprises, small businesses, and individuals to find email addresses of the customers who are in deadly need of your products.
By using
Sergey Babkin wrote:
> Terry Lambert wrote:
> >
> > It got really bogged down when someone pointed out that
> > they were running CPUs with different clock rates in their
> > SMP box, just to see what the net effect would be. THe
>
> As far as I understand, you just physically can't do it:
> t
Terry Lambert wrote:
>
> It got really bogged down when someone pointed out that
> they were running CPUs with different clock rates in their
> SMP box, just to see what the net effect would be. THe
As far as I understand, you just physically can't do it:
the P-II CPU initialization depends on
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 10:27:22AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Josh Paetzel wrote:
> > This is a perfect example of, "Just because you can do something,
> > doesn't mean you should."
> >
> > I wouldn't see anything wrong with grabbing the clock frequency of the
> > first cpu in the system and n
:Doug White wrote:
:> I've been asked several times about how to get CPU speed information for
:> inventory purposes.
:>
:> People would really like the speed number printed on the chip, not what
:> it's currently running at, if that's retrievable :)
:
:Can't mask the speed number.
:
:Chips with
Doug White wrote:
> I've been asked several times about how to get CPU speed information for
> inventory purposes.
>
> People would really like the speed number printed on the chip, not what
> it's currently running at, if that's retrievable :)
Can't mask the speed number.
Chips with a lower pr
On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
> > What for? You haven't caught the Megahertz bug too, have you? 8)
>
> I'm not supposed to focus on Megahertz, I work for Apple, but various
> benchmarking folks also like to be able to print stats like this out
> on their comparison charts and it see
Josh Paetzel wrote:
> This is a perfect example of, "Just because you can do something,
> doesn't mean you should."
>
> I wouldn't see anything wrong with grabbing the clock frequency of the
> first cpu in the system and noting in the man page that if you have
> multiple cpus and you aren't runni
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 10:08:53AM +, Josh Paetzel wrote:
> This is a perfect example of, "Just because you can do something,
> doesn't mean you should."
>
> I wouldn't see anything wrong with grabbing the clock frequency of the
> first cpu in the system and noting in the man page that if y
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 08:46:46PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Matthew Emmerton wrote:
> > > > > This was actually discussed a while back (a month or two ago).
> > > > >
> > > > > It got really bogged down when someone pointed out that
> > > > > they were running CPUs with different clock rates
--- Jordan Hubbard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not supposed to focus on Megahertz, I work for Apple, but various
> benchmarking folks also like to be able to print stats like this out
> on their comparison charts and it seems a lot easier than grepping
> /var/run/dmesg.boot. :)
I personally
> What for? You haven't caught the Megahertz bug too, have you? 8)
I'm not supposed to focus on Megahertz, I work for Apple, but various
benchmarking folks also like to be able to print stats like this out
on their comparison charts and it seems a lot easier than grepping
/var/run/dmesg.boot. :)
On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, Michael Smith wrote:
> > hw.busfrequency = 133326902
>
> Not typically obtainable. And which bus?
This is available for ia64. I think the speed returned by ia64 firmware
for this is the FSB speed.
>
> > hw.cpufrequency = 66700
>
> Should be obtainable on Alpha and Spar
> hw.busfrequency = 133326902
Not typically obtainable. And which bus?
> hw.cpufrequency = 66700
Should be obtainable on Alpha and Sparc, and calculable on x86 (though it
will probably have to be calculated at the time the sysctl is read, since
it's variable).
> hw.cachelinesize = 32
>
Matthew Emmerton wrote:
> > > > This was actually discussed a while back (a month or two ago).
> > > >
> > > > It got really bogged down when someone pointed out that
> > > > they were running CPUs with different clock rates in their
> > > > SMP box, just to see what the net effect would be. THe
> hw.busfrequency = 133326902
> hw.cpufrequency = 66700
> hw.cachelinesize = 32
> hw.l1icachesize = 32768
> hw.l1dcachesize = 32768
> hw.l2settings = -2147483648
> hw.l2cachesize = 262144
>
> Assuming that some or all of this information can be derived on x86 /
> alpha / sparc, how useful do
> On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, Brooks Davis wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 04:25:00PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > > This was actually discussed a while back (a month or two ago).
> > >
> > > It got really bogged down when someone pointed out that
> > > they were running CPUs with different clock
On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
> hw.busfrequency = 133326902
> hw.cpufrequency = 66700
hw.freq.{bus,cpu}
> hw.cachelinesize = 32
> hw.l1icachesize = 32768
> hw.l1dcachesize = 32768
> hw.l2settings = -2147483648
> hw.l2cachesize = 262144
hw.cache.size.line
hw.cache.size.l1.i
hw.c
Wouldn't it make the most sense to just have the
hw.cpu#
stuff you mentioned in email? That's the easiest way to understand
the data as a user at least.
Later,
George
--
George V. Neville-Neil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Neville-Neil Consulting
On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 04:25:00PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > This was actually discussed a while back (a month or two ago).
> >
> > It got really bogged down when someone pointed out that
> > they were running CPUs with different clock rates in
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 04:25:00PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> This was actually discussed a while back (a month or two ago).
>
> It got really bogged down when someone pointed out that
> they were running CPUs with different clock rates in their
> SMP box, just to see what the net effect would
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * Jordan Hubbard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020313 15:56] wrote:
[ ... ]
> > Assuming that some or all of this information can be derived on x86 /
> > alpha / sparc, how useful do folks think it would be to have this
> > information be available from sysctl space? I personally
* Jordan Hubbard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020313 15:56] wrote:
> hw.busfrequency = 133326902
> hw.cpufrequency = 66700
> hw.cachelinesize = 32
> hw.l1icachesize = 32768
> hw.l1dcachesize = 32768
> hw.l2settings = -2147483648
> hw.l2cachesize = 262144
>
> Assuming that some or all of this informat
hw.busfrequency = 133326902
hw.cpufrequency = 66700
hw.cachelinesize = 32
hw.l1icachesize = 32768
hw.l1dcachesize = 32768
hw.l2settings = -2147483648
hw.l2cachesize = 262144
Assuming that some or all of this information can be derived on x86 /
alpha / sparc, how useful do folks think it would
Foldi Tamas wrote:
>
> Hello hackers,
>
> I tried the following program on Tru64, FreeBSD and linux:
>
> #include
> #include
> #include
> #include
> main() {
> int fd;
> fd = open ( "/tmp/foobar", (O_RDWR | O_CREAT), 0020);
> perror("open");
> close(
He's talking about the different 'group' setting.. I think.
it's different because SYSV (linux is based on the semantics of sysV) and
BSD have a differnt semantic on this and always have..
BSD makes the file get the same group as the directory.
Linux gives it the primary group of the creator. Lin
Foldi Tamas wrote:
| Hello hackers,
Don't send this sort of newbie programmer question to the
hackers list (or to any of the FreeBSD lists).
| I tried the following program on Tru64, FreeBSD and linux:
|
| #include
| #include
| #include
| #include
| main() {
| int fd;
|
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Foldi Tamas wrote:
> The program ran successfully, but the created file was different.
> On Linux:
> -w1 crow crow0 Jan 16 10:32 /tmp/foobar
>
> On Tru64/FreeBSD:
> --1 crow users 0 Jan 16 10:30 /tmp/foobar
What
My first guess is that the 'umask' differs in your various systems.
"man 2 umask".
Regards,
Justin
On Wednesday, January 16, 2002, at 01:59 AM, Foldi Tamas wrote:
> Hello hackers,
>
> I tried the following program on Tru64, FreeBSD and linux:
>
> #include
> #include
> #include
> #in
Hello hackers,
I tried the following program on Tru64, FreeBSD and linux:
#include
#include
#include
#include
main() {
int fd;
fd = open ( "/tmp/foobar", (O_RDWR | O_CREAT), 0020);
perror("open");
close(fd);
}
The program ran successfully, but the
peace
this mail containes VIRUS...
please barge this email address...!!! it is bringing
virus to the mailing lists...
DO NOT OPEN THE ATTACHMENT (for windows and wine
users!)
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
cid:SOMECID
height=0 width=0>
peace
> ATTACHMENT part 2 audio/x-wav name=whatever.exe
peace
http://www.research.ibm.com/K42/
Rayson
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
http://personals.yahoo.com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Hello,
Since the relaes for 5.0 was extended another year, an interesting
feature I'd like to see go in to the kernel is hooks. So users
can add extra security checks.. etc. There's a project in its
beginnings right now,
www.freesoftware.fsf.org/jailuser/
Think anyone could join the pr
. ORG
Subject: Re: FW: Interesting Router Question
Deepak Jain wrote:
> We've got a customer running a FreeBSD router with 2 x 1GE interfaces [ti0
> and ti1]. At no point was bandwidth an issue.
>
> The router was under some kind of ICMP attack:
>
> For about 30 minutes:
>
Deepak Jain wrote:
> We've got a customer running a FreeBSD router with 2 x 1GE interfaces [ti0
> and ti1]. At no point was bandwidth an issue.
>
> The router was under some kind of ICMP attack:
>
> For about 30 minutes:
> icmp-response bandwidth limit 96304/200 pps
I've seen this happen in a
On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Mike Silbersack wrote:
> As to what type of flood that is - you can't tell with that version of
> freebsd. It could've been a UDP or TCP flood (ACK or SYN). It actually
> couldn't have been a icmp flood, that version of freebsd didn't limit icmp
> responses. (Even though t
On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, Deepak Jain wrote:
> We've got a customer running a FreeBSD router with 2 x 1GE interfaces [ti0
> and ti1]. At no point was bandwidth an issue.
>
> The router was under some kind of ICMP attack:
>
> For about 30 minutes:
> icmp-response bandwidth limit 96304/200 pps
...
>
FreeBSD-Questions; freebsd-isp@FreeBSD. ORG
> Subject: Interesting Router Question
>
>
>
> We've got a customer running a FreeBSD router with 2 x 1GE interfaces [ti0
> and ti1]. At no point was bandwidth an issue.
>
> The router was under some kind of ICMP attack:
>
-Original Message-
From: Deepak Jain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 7:04 PM
To: FreeBSD-Questions; freebsd-isp@FreeBSD. ORG
Subject: Interesting Router Question
We've got a customer running a FreeBSD router with 2 x 1GE interfaces [ti0
and ti1]. At no
Since people are always saying that they want interesting projects, I
thought I'd throw this one out there. The default malloc settings of AJ
(man malloc for more details) have uncovered two bugs in one of my ports,
xscreensaver. The port consists of a server that handles screen control,
Karsten W. Rohrbach([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.05.29 21:44:03 +:
> the author also addresses the typical GENERIC kernel problems on
> production machines (NBMCLUSTERS too low,...), anyway it's very
s/NBMCLUSTERS/NMBCLUSTERS/
uptime strikes back again ;-)
/k
--
> question = ( to ) ? be : ! be;
,...), anyway it's very
interesting to read. he also addresses the typical linux problems on
production boxes.
have fun,
/k
--
KR433/KR11-RIPE -- WebMonster Community Founder -- nGENn GmbH Senior Techie
http://www.webmonster.de/ -- ftp://ftp.webmonster.de/ -- http://www.ngenn.net/
karsten&ro
Bakul Shah wrote:
>
> > > Though, a lack of good Unicode support on FreeBSD seems like
> > > a legitimate enough reason for the move.
> >
> > Yes, it would, if it were true, see /usr/ports/devel/libunicode.
>
> One port does not make good support. For that FreeBDS has to
> have native unicode s
> > Though, a lack of good Unicode support on FreeBSD seems like
> > a legitimate enough reason for the move.
>
> Yes, it would, if it were true, see /usr/ports/devel/libunicode.
One port does not make good support. For that FreeBDS has to
have native unicode support.
> In order to determine i
Bakul Shah wrote:
>
> Though, a lack of good Unicode support on FreeBSD seems like
> a legitimate enough reason for the move.
Yes, it would, if it were true, see /usr/ports/devel/libunicode.
> Regardless, note that doubling of the performance meant they
> saved anywhere from $10M to $20M (5000
I've put a mailbox containing some of the 'interesting commits' I've
flagged from the OpenBSD CVS commit mailing list at
http://www.freebsd.org/~kris/openbsd.mbox
There are some easy commits there, but I don't have time to do much
myself (it's enough work
> > >From the top level page I read hotmail handles 550,000 change
> > requests a day. Later in the article they say they have a
> > 5000 server farm. That translates to 110 change requests a
> > day on average per server. If the peak rate is 10 times the
> > average, that is still only about 1
Not very well.
Especially if somebody made webpage using Microsoft tools,
it doesn't work with Netscape very well.
Sometimes you will see empty screen from Netscape.
Sometimes javascript button will appear different location in the screen. ;<
Hyun
Ronald G Minnich wrote:
>
> On Sun, 15 Apr 200
On Sun, 15 Apr 2001, Robert Watson wrote:
>
> On Sun, 15 Apr 2001, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> > > http://www.microsoft.com/backstage/column_T2_1.htm
> >
> > this gives a blank screen... maybe they removed it.
>
> I found I had some netscape interop problems. Trying hitting reload a
> couple of t
Robert Watson wrote:
>
> On Sun, 15 Apr 2001, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> > > http://www.microsoft.com/backstage/column_T2_1.htm
> >
> > this gives a blank screen... maybe they removed it.
>
> I found I had some netscape interop problems. Trying hitting reload a
> couple of times.
If you're us
On Sun, 15 Apr 2001, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > http://www.microsoft.com/backstage/column_T2_1.htm
>
> this gives a blank screen... maybe they removed it.
I found I had some netscape interop problems. Trying hitting reload a
couple of times.
Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, T
Doug Barton wrote:
>
> Bakul Shah wrote:
> >
> > >From the top level page I read hotmail handles 550,000 change
> > requests a day. Later in the article they say they have a
> > 5000 server farm. That translates to 110 change requests a
> > day on average per server. If the peak rate is 10 tim
Bakul Shah wrote:
>
> >From the top level page I read hotmail handles 550,000 change
> requests a day. Later in the article they say they have a
> 5000 server farm. That translates to 110 change requests a
> day on average per server. If the peak rate is 10 times the
> average, that is still o
* Eric Lee Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010410 15:38] wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, HyunSeog Ryu wrote:
> > . Migrating Microsoft® Hotmail® from FreeBSD to Microsoft Windows® 2000
> > Technical Case Study
> >http://www.microsoft.com/technet/migration/hotmail/default.asp
>
> They forgot to do
On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, HyunSeog Ryu wrote:
> . Migrating Microsoft® Hotmail® from FreeBSD to Microsoft Windows® 2000
> Technical Case Study
>http://www.microsoft.com/technet/migration/hotmail/default.asp
They forgot to document reason #0 for migration to Windows 2000: Because
running FreeBSD
to the parrent
It's working right now on linux, but I think there's a small
bug in passing a file descriptor over a pipe. FWIW, I'll let you know
if I hear any more regarding this apache patch. -sc
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 10:54:16AM -0400, Robert Watson wrote:
> One
ave them $5M or so! I'd take
that challenge if I can get 50% of the savings!:-)
It would be interesting to see what Yahoo has done for Yahoo
mail.
-- bakul
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
parts of the web server into kernel-space, a
design choice that, while gleaning additional performance, may be
questionable from a stability and design perspective.
One of the interesting pieces of performance work in FreeBSD that has come
out of Yahoo! is the introduction of Accept Filters, which
Hi, folks
Today I got email from Microsoft regarding hotmail migration.
. Migrating Microsoft® Hotmail® from FreeBSD to Microsoft Windows® 2000
Technical Case Study
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/migration/hotmail/default.asp
If you have free time, enjoy M$'s wonderful marketing power.
* Josef Grosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010207 07:31]:
> I'm fooling around with java and have installed the linux port of java 1.3
> on a 4.2-STABLE system (last cvsuped and make world on Jan 30). I'm running
> a very simple java program ;
> It compiles cleanly but when I run it I get ;
>
> erie% j
I'm fooling around with java and have installed the linux port of java 1.3
on a 4.2-STABLE system (last cvsuped and make world on Jan 30). I'm running
a very simple java program ;
public class HelloWorld
{
public static void main(String[] args)
{
System.out.println("Hello
On Sat, 1 Jan 2000, Kirk McKusick wrote:
> Delta 1.40 to ffs_softdep.c (12/16/1999) fixes the `hanging
> while holding a lock' problem. It should be propagated to the
> 3.X branch.
>
> I have been working on a number of performance improvements to
> soft updates that will hopefully assist in the
Delta 1.40 to ffs_softdep.c (12/16/1999) fixes the `hanging
while holding a lock' problem. It should be propagated to the
3.X branch.
I have been working on a number of performance improvements to
soft updates that will hopefully assist in the postmark
benchmarks. Hopefully they will be ready to
Ho ho! Overnight the KVM useage in my postmark test on my FreeBSD-3.x
test box jumped from 8MB to 51MB.
My 4.x test box has remained stable at 18MB - no jump in KVM useage.
Now I am having a hellofatime trying to stop the four postmark processes.
If I stop one it prevents t
FYI:
It just took me 2 attempts to realise that the 3.3-R installation
on Alpha that gave me ")2: cannot execute" in the latest 'cp' of the kernel
was actually installing the *Intel* 3.3-R cdrom.
Sysinstall will happily do this for you.. ;-)
Problem's been fixed by adding 2 strong espresso's
I've been doing some housecleaning lately and I finally decided to set
up
a one-way ssh authentication from my workstation to my gateway machine. I
set up the ssh keys and that was all good. Then I went to start an X app on
the gateway expecting it to just pop up on the workstation's X dis
I've been doing some housecleaning lately and I finally decided to set up
a one-way ssh authentication from my workstation to my gateway machine. I
set up the ssh keys and that was all good. Then I went to start an X app on
the gateway expecting it to just pop up on the workstation's X dis
Greets ...
I just noticed that on my 2.2.6 System, I had to enable the
options ATAPI
options ATAPI_STATIC
device wcd0
before the following had any effect:
controller wdc1 at
disk wd2 at wdc1 drive 0
disk wd3 at wdc1 drive 1
in my kernel config file. So, the second controller was only se
Greets ...
I just noticed that on my 2.2.6 System, I had to enable the
options ATAPI
options ATAPI_STATIC
device wcd0
before the following had any effect:
controller wdc1 at
disk wd2 at wdc1 drive 0
disk wd3 at wdc1 drive 1
in my kernel config file. So, the second controller was only see
On Thu, 29 Jul 1999, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 29 Jul 1999 00:52:27 -0400, "Brian F. Feldman" wrote:
>
> > If noone has any objections, I will commit this and MFC it in a week or so.
> >
> > --- src/usr.bin/cmp/regular.c.orig Thu Jul 29 00:43:50 1999
> > +++ src/usr.bin/cmp/regular.c
On Thu, 29 Jul 1999, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 29 Jul 1999 00:52:27 -0400, "Brian F. Feldman" wrote:
>
> > If noone has any objections, I will commit this and MFC it in a week or so.
> >
> > --- src/usr.bin/cmp/regular.c.orig Thu Jul 29 00:43:50 1999
> > +++ src/usr.bin/cmp/regular.
>
> > >
> > > If someone is interested to solve a problem:
> > >
> > > $ dd if=/dev/zero bs=8848 count=1 of=a 2>/dev/null
> > > $ cp a b
> > > $ cmp a b 0 0x300
> > > Segmentation fault (core dumped)
> > > $ cmp a b 0 0x200
> > > cmp: EOF on b
> > > $ cmp a b 0x300 0
> > > cmp: EOF on a
> > >
>
On Thu, 29 Jul 1999 00:52:27 -0400, "Brian F. Feldman" wrote:
> If noone has any objections, I will commit this and MFC it in a week or so.
>
> --- src/usr.bin/cmp/regular.c.origThu Jul 29 00:43:50 1999
> +++ src/usr.bin/cmp/regular.c Thu Jul 29 00:44:54 1999
|--- src/usr.bin/cmp/regular.c
>
> > >
> > > If someone is interested to solve a problem:
> > >
> > > $ dd if=/dev/zero bs=8848 count=1 of=a 2>/dev/null
> > > $ cp a b
> > > $ cmp a b 0 0x300
> > > Segmentation fault (core dumped)
> > > $ cmp a b 0 0x200
> > > cmp: EOF on b
> > > $ cmp a b 0x300 0
> > > cmp: EOF on a
> > >
On Thu, 29 Jul 1999 00:52:27 -0400, "Brian F. Feldman" wrote:
> If noone has any objections, I will commit this and MFC it in a week or so.
>
> --- src/usr.bin/cmp/regular.c.origThu Jul 29 00:43:50 1999
> +++ src/usr.bin/cmp/regular.c Thu Jul 29 00:44:54 1999
|--- src/usr.bin/cmp/regular.
In message "Brian
F. Feldman" writes:
: if ((p1 = (u_char *)mmap(NULL,
: - (size_t)length, PROT_READ, MAP_SHARED, fd1, off1)) == (u_char
*)MAP_FAILED)
: + (size_t)mlength, PROT_READ, MAP_SHARED, fd1, off1)) == (u_char
*)MAP_FAILED)
: err(ERR_EXIT, "%s", file1
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Brian F.
Feldman" writes:
: if ((p1 = (u_char *)mmap(NULL,
: - (size_t)length, PROT_READ, MAP_SHARED, fd1, off1)) == (u_char *)MAP_FAILED)
: + (size_t)mlength, PROT_READ, MAP_SHARED, fd1, off1)) == (u_char
:*)MAP_FAILED)
: err(E
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
