On 02/04/2013 08:48 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
> Is the following page still useful?
>
> Would there be any objection to me removing it?
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/projects/c99/index.html
We are still working on complex and long double functions.
___
free
On 09/17/12 11:14, Lorenzo Cogotti wrote:
Il 17/09/2012 17:42, Poul-Henning Kamp ha scritto:
In message , Lorenzo Cogotti writ
es:
Hi,
I was wondering about the possibility of FreeBSD to provide an official
supported graphical environment.
We already do: It's called "X11" :-)
(sending back
Find some mailing lists that have nothing to do with FreeBSD, and
barrage them with spam promoting FreeBSD.
:-)
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "fre
window.
>
> Not realistic but illustrative, imagine 5 1 second NCQ operations
> terminating in the 1 second window. The current code will calculate the
> duration as 5 seconds, dividing by 1 will yield 500%.
>
> Thanks
>
>
> On 02/13/2012 11:51 AM, Ivan Voras wrote:
We've an application that logs data on one very large raid6 array
and updates/accesses a database on another smaller raid5 array.
Both arrays are connected to the same PCIe 3ware RAID controller. The
system has 2 six core 3Ghz processors and 24 GB of RAM. The system is
running FreeBSD 8.1.
The
On 01/18/2012 06:57 PM, Dieter BSD wrote:
Andriy writes:
And dealing with PRs is not always exciting.
Neither is brushing your teeth or cleaning the kitchen, but most of us
manage to do them at least occasionally. Part of being a grown up.
Instead of looking for a stick to hold over developer
Hi all,
Am wondering if anyone has done drivers the these sorts of network
interfaces that are offered by VMWare & Virtual box. I know that on
some Linux VMs I run, performance went from 20MB/s to 30MB/s to an NFS
server which I swicthed to the virtio network interfaces.
Ste
Hi all,
Am currently using an onboard GB nic, on my main fileserver (8.2
64bit, AMD, 8GB mem) which is seen as nfe0 (Nvidia, basically). Is
there a better one available? I have a one lane PCIe slot and any
number of PCI slots available.
Stephen
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
>
> On 25/07/2011, at 11:03, Stephen Hocking wrote:
>> Now this is all very interesting, but I would like to be able to map
>> that back to a /dev/adXpY device entry, so when I offline them I can
>> then go to
to a /dev/adXpY device entry, so when I offline them I can
then go to the appropriate physical disk. I thought that gpart show -r
might help, but the numbers emitted from that don't match up. Looking
at the major/minor numbers of the devices don't help either. Does
anyone have an idea?
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 9:19 AM, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message:
> Garrett Cooper writes:
> : On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Stephen Hocking
> : wrote:
> : > Hi all,
> : >
> : > Am noticing the following when attempting to build a kernel:
>
lieve it's related to the COMPAT_IA32 option being
replaced (I haven't built a kernel since the beginning of the month).
Stephen
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
T
t needs to be tabs not
spaces and the beginning of lines.)
#!/usr/bin/make -f
PACKAGES?=/usr/home/stephen/packages-8-amd
PKG_DBDIR?=/var/db/pkg
PORTSDIR?=/usr/ports
PKG_LIST!=ls ${PKG_DBDIR}
all:${PKG_LIST:C+(.*)+${PACKAGES}/All/\1.tbz+}
.for target in ${PKG_LIST}
${PACKAGES}/All/${t
Victor Sudakov wrote:
But to hell with this. I started the topic because I think something
is wrong with SVN to CVS export, which upsets cvsup and causes
"Checksum mismatch" errors. Is anybody willing to look at it?
I second Victor's request.
___
f
Doug Barton wrote:
I was not going to reply on this thread at all, but the amount of
random speculation has now reached a pathological level.
The spurious new line at the end of a file has nothing to do with svn,
it is an artifact of how the file was originally transferred to the
cvsup mirror. T
I would like to introduce a program into the base called
"screw-the-whole-system." It would do something like this:
while true; do \
echo "Please wait while your system is being destroyed..."
sleep 10
done
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009, Julian Elischer wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Alexander Leidinger [090822 10:44] wrote:
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 00:04:10 -0700 Julian Elischer
wrote:
The purists won out in that one by shouting loudly and screaming
about socialized
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Alexander Leidinger [090822 10:44] wrote:
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 00:04:10 -0700 Julian Elischer
wrote:
The purists won out in that one by shouting loudly and screaming
about socialized healthware. Consequently we have 47 million
unsupported devices.
You forgot to tell
ple, the printf command demands that you tell the printf command
what are the data types of the data you give to it.
So I think that the kind of long winded print command you are advocating
is the correct way to do it.
Stephen
___
freebsd-hackers@fre
RW wrote:
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 17:40:30 -0400
Chuck Robey wrote:
I just had to see if I could locate if there was a gnome project page
by looking at the FreeBSD web pages. Why don't you try that
yourself? I'll tell you, it's really FAR from being obvious. I'm
just saying, even if folks don't
Nate Eldredge wrote:
int bangbang(int x) { return !!x; }
int ternary(int x) { return x ? 1 : 0; }
Stylewise, I prefer
int notzero(int x) { return x!=0; }
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-
D-7.x?
If so, should the man page of "sigaction(2)" be upgraded to say this?
Thanks, Stephen
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Jingshao Chen wrote:
Hi,
Since you have been unix admin for a few years, I guess you probably have
some experience with C programming. This book is more advanced, but it
is a really good one.
Advanced Programming in the UNIX Environment: Paperback Edition (2nd Edition)
http://www.amazon.com/Adv
Rob Lytle wrote:
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 9:33 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rob Lytle wrote:
Hi Kevin,
The sysinstall dependency problem has existed for 10 years, so I doubt
that
its unique to me. It has occurred in every installation I have ever done.
Rob Lytle wrote:
Hi Kevin,
The sysinstall dependency problem has existed for 10 years, so I doubt that
its unique to me. It has occurred in every installation I have ever done.
I use portupgrade for all ports.
i strongly disagree with using ports for huge packages. I don't have the
time to
Sergey Babkin wrote:
I want to use getrusage to see how much time a program is using. But
this is a multithreaded program, and I just want the time taken by that
particular thread!
I know this info must be available somewhere, because top -H seems to
provide it. But getrusage seems to give
I want to use getrusage to see how much time a program is using. But
this is a multithreaded program, and I just want the time taken by that
particular thread!
I know this info must be available somewhere, because top -H seems to
provide it. But getrusage seems to give the total rusage for t
Lothar Braun wrote:
What about having two utilities for the installation process? Something
like a very small (non-gui/non-X) version of "sysinstall" that just
installs a base system and only has the functionality to
- partition/label a disk
- configure the network (if needed for installation
uires switching around 40 times, then that is bad. But it should be
something easily fixable, without greatly modifying the rest of the process.
Stephen
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hacke
Niki Denev wrote:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:37 PM, Stephen Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to compile it on 6.2 and get
make: don't know how to make cryptodev_if.h. Stop
???
where is this file?
Thanks,
Steve
Have you applied the 6.2 patch included in the late
Niki Denev wrote:
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 6:05 PM, Patrick Lamaizière
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Le Fri, 6 Jun 2008 23:41:35 +0200,
Patrick Lamaizière <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
Hello,
I'm trying to port the glxsb driver from OpenBSD to FreeBSD 7-STABLE
(via the NetBSD port).
" The glxsb d
Hi,
Given that Nvidia aren't offering a driver for their cards for 64bit
FreeBSD, is anyone else having success using another (preferably
PCI-E) card with 3D acceleration?
Stephen
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
top doesn't get TIME right for threaded processes. How about this small
change:
--- usr.bin/top/machine.c-orig 2008-06-12 23:06:08.0 -0500
+++ usr.bin/top/machine.c 2008-06-12 23:06:51.0 -0500
@@ -725,6 +725,7 @@
prev_pp = pp;
} els
Chuck Robey wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I was wondering ... I have (I think) nvidia working on my box, or at least,
I am calling out the nvidia driver in the xorg.conf, but I was wondering if
there is any program that only works with the nvidia hardware, some way I
can a
On Sun, 25 Nov 2007, Kip Macy wrote:
I just want to add my 2 cents, that my recent experience with FreeBSD MP
has been extremely positive. I tend to use highly CPU bound MP programs,
typically lots and lots of floating point operations. It used to be that
Linux beat FreeBSD hands down - now
On Sun, 25 Nov 2007, Roman Divacky wrote:
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 02:41:35PM -0600, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On Sun, 25 Nov 2007, Robert Watson wrote:
In FreeBSD 8, I expect we'll see a continued focus on both locking
granularity and impr
s for its performance improvements - I should add that Linux didn't do
at all well at taking advantage of hyperthreading, running at the same
speed as with 2 threads.)
Stephen
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.o
-pluggable disks under the control of GEOM?
Stephen
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Robert Noland wrote:
On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 15:56 -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
If you "pkg_delete -f" a package and then install the port again (but
after it has been bumped up a version), then the +CONTENTS of ports that
require the original port will be incorrect. This
eramaproto-1.1.3
@comment DEPORIGIN:x11/xineramaproto
A further benefit of this approach is that one could also accurately
reconstruct the +REQUIRED_BY of the port just reinstalled - right now this
is left empty and thus inaccurate.
What do you guys think? I know I could write the code
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Quoting Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Tue, 17 Jul 2007 19:46:11
-0500):
I appreciate that most people won't have this problem, but it has bitten me.
After you have made and installed a port, but don't clean it, and then
made a bunc
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Quoting Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Tue, 17 Jul 2007 19:46:11
-0500):
I appreciate that most people won't have this problem, but it has bitten me.
After you have made and installed a port, but don't clean it, and then
made a bunc
nts, I'll
submit this as a PR as well.
Stephen
--- bsd.port.mk-old 2007-07-17 19:31:08.0 -0500
+++ bsd.port.mk 2007-07-17 19:29:16.0 -0500
@@ -5485,7 +5485,9 @@
done
ACTUAL-PACKAGE-DEPENDS?= \
- if [ "${_LIB_RUN_DEPENDS}" != " " ]; t
of difference to performance?
Right now I have no CPUTYPE set at all.
Thanks, Stephen
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
ant to do a lot of profiling and see where the speed bottlenecks
really are before writing lots of code.
Stephen
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Wed, 30 May 2007, Bakul Shah wrote:
Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2007-May-27 16:12:54 -0700, Bakul Shah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Given the size and complexity of the port system I have long
felt that rather than do everything via more and more complex
Mk/*.mk what is is ne
Roman Divacky wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 11:34:24AM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 03:52:16PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
I have been thinking a lot about looking for speed increases for "make
index" and pkg_v
written. The only possibility I see of making it go a lot faster is a
complete redesign, e.g. my just in time idea for processing variables.
Stephen
Just in time (jit), if I remember correctly, is a term used by java
interpreters which compile the byte code into machine code!!! Perhaps this
Ivan Voras wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
I have been thinking a lot about looking for speed increases for "make
index" and pkg_version and things like that. So for example, in
pkg_version, it calls "make -V PKGNAME" for every installed package. Now
"make -V PK
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 03:52:16PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
I have been thinking a lot about looking for speed increases for "make
index" and pkg_version and things like that. So for example, in
pkg_version, it calls "make -V PKG
Hartmut Brandt wrote:
Having done a great deal of rewriting of make some two years ago I can
tell you that even a small change to make is a tough job testing-wise:
run all the combinations of !-j and -j on all architectures and run
the change through the port-building cluster. That's a warning
dback, either of the form of "this won't work," or of the form
"I will do it," or "I have tried to do this."
Best regards, Stephen
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org m
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 03:52:16PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
I have been thinking a lot about looking for speed increases for "make
index" and pkg_version and things like that. So for example, in
pkg_version, it calls "make -V PKG
On Mon, 28 May 2007, Michel Talon wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith said:
I suggest rewriting "make" so that variables are only evaluated on a
"need to know" basis.
or "I have tried to do this."
Of course a lot of people have thinked about it, and quickly
o throw this idea out there to get
some feedback, either of the form of "this won't work," or of the form
"I will do it," or "I have tried to do this."
Best regards, Stephen
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing
On Sun, 11 Feb 2007, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On Sun, 11 Feb 2007, Daniel Eischen wrote:
On Sun, 11 Feb 2007, Eugene M. Kim wrote:
Hello all,
I am writing a mouse device driver for my Wacom tablet (Intuos 2 9x12).
The tablet comes with a mouse and I managed to get valid
method, I think, but I suspect that the look up table will be
so much easier to program, and negligable extra space overhead.
Stephen
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubsc
is seems to have been
fixed with more recent versions.
Stephen
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Matthew Hudson wrote:
Mon Dec 11 09:08:37 PST 2006 c0re dumped wrote:
I wonder if is possible to read data from a
certain file without using a pipe.
Let me explain:
I have a process already writing messages to
a logfile. I want to read all written data
(without neither stop nor interfere norm
it is closer to 250% cpu usage.
The other thing I have noticed is that when I split jobs using threads
so that I can use several processors, the speed up to the program is far
less than one might expect - indeed sometimes it even gets slower.
Stephen
sjr MODE=100600
SIZE=18099 MTIME=Jul 8 22:57 2006 FILE LINKUP IN SNAPSHOT
CLEAR? no
** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups
CANNOT ADJUST NUMBER OF FREE BLOCKS: -8
CONTINUE? [yn] n
Othertimes when I run the same commands, I get a consistent snapshot.
Am I doing something wrong?
Thanks,
-SR
--
Steph
upgrade.
So what I am saying is that the problem might be motherboard specific
rather than graphics card specific.
Stephen
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
er* and install 6.1 from scratch.
That's just my tale
- Stephen
--
Stephen Bartlett
President, Bartlett Software, Inc.
http://www.bartlettsoftware.biz/
pgpHhvN5qi0eu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
might
have hesitation over Vol 2, but only because it covers stuff that you
might not need.
He writes extremely well.
--
Stephen Montgomery-Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.math.missouri.edu/~stephen
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http
r to non-blocking. Right?
Personally, I have no qualms being non-POSIX compliant in a good cause.
Wouldn't being non-POSIX on this issue be easier?
Hmm. Should this be on -arch now?
Stephen.
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http:/
On Thursday, 13th January 2005, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>On Wed, 2005-Jan-12 23:54:38 +1000, Stephen McKay wrote:
>>a) Rewrite file descriptor handling in libc_r so it does not set O_NONBLOCK
>>on tty file descriptors unless it is in the foreground. I don't know how
>>hard
Specification). Should tail be coded such that EAGAIN on
stdout is detected and worked around? That seems like too much to expect
tail (and every other ordinary utility) to know about, so I hope my other
efforts yield fruit.
Stephen.
___
freebsd-ha
On Wednesday, 12th January 2005, Stephen McKay wrote:
>[Problems during Open Office compilation on FreeBSD 4.11-RC2]
>After some tracing, I have worked out that the tty is being alternately
>set to nonblocking and back to normal hundreds of times during the compilation
>of Open
for putchar(). This is the documented behaviour (at least it is in the
Single Unix Specification). Should tail be coded such that EAGAIN on
stdout is detected and worked around? That seems like too much to expect
tail (and every other ordinary utility) to k
elps a lot.
Stephen
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
blems like that. I found that the solution was to build
jdk14 before building apache-ant and openoffice - jdk14 seemed to work
better than linux-jdk14. But this was a while back, and so your problem
might be something else. But worth a try.
St
Søren Schmidt wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Thomas Wolf wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
FUJISHIMA Satsuki wrote:
Currently native SATA drives are still not so popular. There are:
Seagate Barracuda ATA V, 7200.7, 7200.8
I have one of these, and I am
Thomas Wolf wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
FUJISHIMA Satsuki wrote:
Currently native SATA drives are still not so popular. There are:
Seagate Barracuda ATA V, 7200.7, 7200.8
I have one of these, and I am really impressed by its performance. I
added one
it is the 8M cache as compared
to the 2M cache. The Seagate 7200.7 had similar performance to a
Seagate 160MHz SCSI drive that I have on another computer.
Stephen
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
nk how to do it with FreeBSD.
Stephen
--
"Opiates are the religion of the masses." - David Cameron Staples
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 23:01:27 -0400
From: Brian Fundakowski Feldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Stephen Hurd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Locking: kern/50827
On Sun, Jul 04, 2004 at 04:06:45PM -0600, Stephen Hurd wrote:
> >
> Right, if you just make it cross-platform in the first place using
> higher- level primitives you don't have to worry what the specific
> kernel and operating system and file system you are using provides.
> It's my opinion tha there won't be other people adopting this API for
> file locking sin
> > Has anyone looked at this? Does anyone have any comments?
> >
> > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/50827
>
> I don't think you'll ever find anyone interested in file locking
> anymore. Since they're all advisory, anyway, you can just implement them
> at a higher level in your a
Well, possibly due to editorial content, kern/50827 has been completely
ignored. Not sure exactly the correct method of bringing something like
this up, but am I the only one who finds flock(), dotlock, and fcntl()
locks insufficient for their needs? Originally, this patch resulted from
porting a
All,
Does anyone know where I can lay my hands on one of those 4 port ethernet
cards that used to be around a while back?
Stephen
--
"Opiates are the religion of the masses." - David Cameron Staples
___
[EMAIL PROTECTE
Is there a technical reason why LINK_MAX is set to 32K? Would
anything bad happen if this value was raised?
Thanks,
--
Stephen J. Roznowski([EMAIL PROTECTED])
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
t; screen.
David,
The extra characters on the screen may have something to do with
this:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=57273
Regards,
Stephen Hilton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
particular the FreeBSD docs were better at explaining how it worked.)
--
Stephen Montgomery-Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.math.missouri.edu/~stephen
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubs
well.
Sorry - it is I who is the complete idiot. Please totalyl ignore my last post.
--
Stephen Montgomery-Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.math.missouri.edu/~stephen
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
pt_time is
not defined anywhere. It looks to me like netinet/ip.h is broken.
What is it that you need netinet/ip.h for? Maybe there are some other include
files that would work just as well.
--
Stephen Montgomery-Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.math.missouri.ed
of
file. Thus select will not block and will say that this file is ready for
reading. In essence, calling select will always say that a file is ready for
reading, and calling select serves no purpose.
Well I definitely learned something.
--
Stephen Montgomery-Smith
[EMAI
tat(), but do I
have any other choices?
I would say, use select(2).
Is there a reason this wouldn't work?
-- Josh
Either select(2) or poll(2) should work.
--
Stephen Montgomery-Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.math.missouri.edu/~stephen
___
pentium 4 or better.
- Remove ext2 support (GPL encumbered).
Remove ffs support also (BSD license encumbered).
- Add perl 5.8 *and* python 2.2 to base.
I agree - perl makes a perfect replacement for tar.
- Remove Sendmail and replace it with Postfix.
I prefer USPS.
--
Stephen Montgomery-Smith
[E
On Sun, 02 Feb 2003 18:27:23 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Stephen Hilton write
> s:
>
> >> maybe we should make some sort of geographical registration
> >> web page so that people can find each other?
>
> Well, new commi
occasion ;-)
Why not base it on latitude and longitude, along with an
email address and text fields to allow for some self
expression of areas of interest etc...?
A clickable map would be a nice interface for the database
lookups with a max radius factor, but really is just icing
on the cake.
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002 06:04:35 +0300 (MSK)
"."@babolo.ru wrote:
> > When multi-boot system operators go bad :-)
> >
> > Using my PC's bios I could select either IDE or SCSI as the
> > boot device, so I could boot either FreeBSD/W2K with the
> > FreeBSD bootmanager on the 1st SCSI drive, run the b
ect file I
created. Is it possible to use "forensic" tools to track that
down and then copy it and write it back to the correct location?
Am up and running now on the spare HD, and can work on my "big
mistake" at my lesiure, thanks in advance.
Regards,
Stephen Hilton
if ((*s = realloc(*s,len+1))==NULL) {
fprintf(stderr,"Allocation error\n");
exit(1);
}
}
else {
if (*s!=NULL) free(*s);
*s = NULL;
}
return *s;
}
--
Stephen Montgomery-Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.math.missouri.edu/~stephen
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
So far I think that this is the weirdest problem I've had with any
FreeBSD box.
I've just recompiled a kernel for this laptop (old Compaq Armada 1550)
which is a P133 with 16Mb of RAM. (Stop laughing you at the back!)
This is running 4.7-RELEASE.
Anyway, it's a reasonably cut down kernel which w
on it and hand out addresses.
Do I have to do any thing else to get it going? What would I use to set ESSIDs
and passords?
Stephen
-
--
The views expressed above are not those of PGS Tensor.
"We've heard that a million monkeys at a million keyboards could produce
t
/query-pr.cgi?pr=20352
--
Stephen Montgomery-Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.math.missouri.edu/~stephen
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
I'm wanting to extract data files off the original Quake 1 CD.
Stephen
--
The views expressed above are not those of PGS Tensor.
"We've heard that a million monkeys at a million keyboards could produce
the Complete Works of Shakespeare; now, thanks
It looks like exactly what I want.
Thanks.
Sergey Lyubka wrote:
> Would getrusage() help ?
>
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 10:21:07AM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
>
>>How do I do the following:
>>
>>1) Find out how much time a program has currentl
nanosleep won't work).
I looked at the man pages, but all I could find was runtime which seems
only to be accessible from the kernel.
--
Stephen Montgomery-Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.math.missouri.edu/~stephen
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscri
sysctl(mib, 2, &boottime, &size, NULL, 0) != -1 &&
boottime.tv_sec != 0) {
uptime = now - boottime.tv_sec;
+ uptime += 5;
if (uptime > 60)
uptime += 30;
days = uptime / 86400;
1 - 100 of 222 matches
Mail list logo
