Lothar Braun wrote:

What about having two utilities for the installation process? Something like a very small (non-gui/non-X) version of "sysinstall" that just installs a base system and only has the functionality to

- partition/label a disk
- configure the network (if needed for installation)
- install the base system (or parts of it)
- install a boot manager

and a second utility "sysconf" that provides the other stuff like post installation system configuration (sshd, mouse), installing packages, etc. The second utility could have an X-based GUI without disturbing the installation process of serial console users or people that don't like X on their machines.

Would that be a good idea?


Why not leave "sysconf" as a curses based interface? To my mind, the difference between X-based and curses is cosmetic. (Plus one of "sysconf"s duties will be to install X, so it would be a bit self-referential.)

Next, it seemed to me that the OP's main complaint was that he had to change the CD's about 40 times when installing packages. Why not just fix that?

_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to